Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nerds With Attitude: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:00, 30 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nerds With Attitude

Non-notable Geocities website, seems to fail WP:WEB; phrase yields 528 Google hits. Ohnoitsjamie 03:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Ohnonitsjamie's reasons. OCNative 04:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom DrIdiot 04:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This was something I was going to nominate after dinner tonight, but it looks like someone beat me to it. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:27, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. NeoJustin 18:59, January 7, 2006 (UTC)
Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 19:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bjelleklang - talk 01:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Islomaniac 973 17:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Why does it only "seem" to fail?[reply]

What? --220.101.30.98 07:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
+<!--
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result of the debate was '''Delete'''. [[User:Enochlau|enochlau]] ([[User talk:Enochlau|talk]]) 00:08, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 ===[[Nerds With Attitude]]===
 Non-notable Geocities website, seems to fail [[WP:WEB]]; phrase yields 528 Google hits. [[User:Ohnoitsjamie|Ohnoitsjamie]] 03:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
@@ Line 7: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete''' as per nom. [[User:Dustimagic|Dustimagic]] 19:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Bjelleklang|Bjelleklang]]  -  [[User_talk:Bjelleklang|talk]] 01:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' --[[User:IslandHopper973|Islomaniac 973]] 17:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Why does it only "seem" to fail?
-*I've got ninety thousand pounds in my pajamas, I've got forty thousand french francs in my fridge, I've got lots of lovely lira now the doichmark's getting dearer and my dollar bills could buy the Brooklin bridge.
-May I point out that the pages history will show that I attempted to delete this page a while back and was shot down by Can't sleep, clown will eat me. Hmmm...
+*What? --[[User:220.101.30.98|220.101.30.98]] 07:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>