Jump to content

Glycorandomization: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lowary (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Changing short description from "Technology platform to enable the rapid diversification of molecules" to "Technology enabling rapid molecule diversification" (Shortdesc helper)
 
(45 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Technology enabling rapid molecule diversification}}
{{intromissing|date=April 2009}}
'''Glycorandomization''', is a [[drug discovery]] and [[drug development]] technology platform to enable the rapid diversification of bioactive small molecules, drug leads and/or approved drugs through the attachment of sugars. Initially developed as a facile method to manipulate carbohydrate substitutions of naturally occurring glycosides to afford the corresponding differentially glycosylated [[natural product]] libraries,<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Yang | first1 = J. | last2 = Hoffmeister | first2 = D. | last3 = Liu | first3 = L. | last4 = Thorson | first4 = J. S. | year = 2004| title = Natural product glycorandomization| journal = Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry| volume = 12 | issue = 7| pages = 1577–1584 | doi=10.1016/j.bmc.2003.12.046| pmid = 15112655 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Langenhan|first1=JM|last2=Griffith|first2=BR|last3=Thorson|first3=JS|title=Neoglycorandomization and chemoenzymatic glycorandomization: Two complementary tools for natural product diversification|journal=Journal of Natural Products|date=Nov 2005|volume=68|issue=11|pages=1696–711|pmid=16309329|doi=10.1021/np0502084}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Griffith|first1=BR|last2=Langenhan|first2=JM|last3=Thorson|first3=JS|title='Sweetening' natural products via glycorandomization|journal=Current Opinion in Biotechnology|date=Dec 2005|volume=16|issue=6|pages=622–30|pmid=16226456|doi=10.1016/j.copbio.2005.10.002}}</ref> glycorandomization applications have expanded to include both small molecules (drug leads and approved drugs) and even macromolecules ([[proteins]]).<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gantt|first1=RW|last2=Peltier-Pain|first2=P|last3=Thorson|first3=JS|title=Enzymatic methods for glyco(diversification/randomization) of drugs and small molecules|journal=Natural Product Reports|date=Oct 2011|volume=28|issue=11|pages=1811–53|pmid=21901218|doi=10.1039/c1np00045d}}</ref> Also referred to as 'glycodiversification',<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Thibodeaux|first1=CJ|last2=Melançon|first2=CE|last3=Liu|first3=HW|title=Unusual sugar biosynthesis and natural product glycodiversification|journal=Nature|date=Apr 26, 2007|volume=446|issue=7139|pages=1008–16|pmid=17460661|doi=10.1038/nature05814|bibcode=2007Natur.446.1008T|s2cid=4404027}}</ref> glycorandomization has led to the discovery of new glycoside analogs which display improvements in potency, selectivity and/or [[ADME-Tox|ADMET]] as compared to the parent molecule.
= Concept =


== Classification ==
'''Glycorandomization''', literally means “diversify the sugar-containing compounds”, is a tool currently used in pharmaceutical industry to modify the sugar residues of the glycosylated natural products by using unique glycosylation strategies. It’s an efficient and convenient way to achieve libraries of natural product derivatives which only differ in the attached sugars.<ref>Yang, J.; Hoffmeister, D.; Liu, L.; Thorson, J. S. “Natural product glycorandomization”. ''Bioorg. Med. Chem.'' '''2004''', ''12'', 1577-1584.</ref><ref name=a>Langenhan, J. M.; Griffith, B. R., Thorson, J. S. “Neoglycorandomization and chemoenzymatic glycorandomization: two complementary tools for natural product diversification”. ''J. Nat. Prod.'' '''2005''', ''68'', 1696-1711.</ref><ref>Griffith, B. R.; Langenhan, J. M.; Thorson, J. S. “’Sweetening’ natural products via glycorandomization”. ''Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.'' '''2005''', ''16'', 622-630.</ref>


The traditional method for attaching sugars to natural products, drugs or drug leads is by [[chemical glycosylation]]. This classical approach typically requires multiple protection/deprotection steps in addition to the key anomeric activation/coupling reaction which, depending upon the glycosyl donor/acceptor pair, can lead to a mixture of [[anomers]]. Unlike classical chemical glycosylation, glycorandomization methods are divergent (''i.e.'', diverge from a common starting material, see [[divergent synthesis]]) and are not dependent upon sugar/[[aglycon]] protection/deprotection or sugar anomeric activation. Two complementary strategies to achieve glycorandomization/diversification have been developed: an enzyme-based strategy referred to as 'chemoenzymatic glycorandomization' and a chemoselective method known as 'neoglycorandomization'. Both methods start with free [[reducing sugar]]s and a target [[aglycon]] to afford a library of compounds which differ solely by the sugars appended to the target natural product, drug or drug lead.
= Classification =


=== Chemoenzymatic glycorandomization ===
The traditional method to obtain the natural product analogues is by total synthesis via laborious and time consuming protection and deprotection. To generate the analogues more efficiently, recently, chemists have developed two complementary strategies to achieve glycorandomization: chemoenzymatic glycorandomization and neoglycorandomization. These two methods do not need any protected sugars and aglycons. Both of them start with unprotected and unactivated reducing sugars and end with a library of sugars attached to the same aglycon.
[[File:Glycorandomization overview.gif|framed]]
Chemoenzymatic glycorandomization was inspired by the early pathway engineering work of Hutchinson and coworkers that suggested natural product glycosyltransferases were capable of utilizing non-native sugar nucleotide donors.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Madduri|first1=K|last2=Kennedy|first2=J|last3=Rivola|first3=G|last4=Inventi-Solari|first4=A|last5=Filippini|first5=S|last6=Zanuso|first6=G|last7=Colombo|first7=AL|last8=Gewain|first8=KM|last9=Occi|first9=JL|last10=MacNeil|first10=DJ|last11=Hutchinson|first11=CR|title=Production of the antitumor drug epirubicin (4'-epidoxorubicin) and its precursor by a genetically engineered strain of ''Streptomyces peucetius''|journal=Nature Biotechnology|date=Jan 1998|volume=16|issue=1|pages=69–74|pmid=9447597|doi=10.1038/nbt0198-69|s2cid=7304148}}</ref> The initial platform for chemoenzymatic glycorandomization was based upon a set of two highly permissive sugar activation enzymes (a sugar anomeric [[kinase]] and sugar-1-phosphate [[nucleotidyltransferase]]) to afford sugar nucleotide libraries as donors for these promiscuous [[glycosyltransferases]] where the permissivity of the corresponding sugar kinase<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hoffmeister|first1=D|last2=Yang|first2=J|last3=Liu|first3=L|last4=Thorson|first4=JS|title=Creation of the first anomeric D/L-sugar kinase by means of directed evolution|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|date=Nov 11, 2003|volume=100|issue=23|pages=13184–9|pmid=14612558|doi=10.1073/pnas.2235011100|pmc=263743|bibcode=2003PNAS..10013184H|doi-access=free}}</ref> and nucleotidyltransferase<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Barton|first1=WA|last2=Lesniak|first2=J|last3=Biggins|first3=JB|last4=Jeffrey|first4=PD|last5=Jiang|first5=J|last6=Rajashankar|first6=KR|last7=Thorson|first7=JS|last8=Nikolov|first8=DB|title=Structure, mechanism and engineering of a nucleotidylyltransferase as a first step toward glycorandomization|journal=Nature Structural Biology|date=Jun 2001|volume=8|issue=6|pages=545–51|pmid=11373625|doi=10.1038/88618|s2cid=25049013}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Moretti|first1=R|last2=Chang|first2=A|last3=Peltier-Pain|first3=P|last4=Bingman|first4=CA|last5=Phillips GN|first5=Jr|last6=Thorson|first6=JS|title=Expanding the nucleotide and sugar 1-phosphate promiscuity of nucleotidyltransferase RmlA via directed evolution|journal=The Journal of Biological Chemistry|date=Apr 15, 2011|volume=286|issue=15|pages=13235–43|pmid=21317292|doi=10.1074/jbc.m110.206433|pmc=3075670|doi-access=free}}</ref> was expanded by [[enzyme engineering]] and [[directed evolution]]. The first application of this three enzyme (kinase, nucleotidyltransferase and glycosyltransferase) strategy enabled the product of a set of >30 differentially glycosylated [[vancomycin]]s, some members of which were further diversified chemoselectively by virtue of the installation of sugars bearing chemoselective handles.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Fu|first1=X|last2=Albermann|first2=C|last3=Jiang|first3=J|last4=Liao|first4=J|last5=Zhang|first5=C|last6=Thorson|first6=JS|title=Antibiotic optimization via in vitro glycorandomization|journal=Nature Biotechnology|date=Dec 2003|volume=21|issue=12|pages=1467–9|pmid=14608364|doi=10.1038/nbt909|s2cid=2469387}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Fu|first1=X|last2=Albermann|first2=C|last3=Zhang|first3=C|last4=Thorson|first4=JS|title=Diversifying vancomycin via chemoenzymatic strategies|journal=Organic Letters|date=Apr 14, 2005|volume=7|issue=8|pages=1513–5|pmid=15816740|doi=10.1021/ol0501626}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Peltier-Pain|first1=P|last2=Marchillo|first2=K|last3=Zhou|first3=M|last4=Andes|first4=DR|last5=Thorson|first5=JS|title=Natural product disaccharide engineering through tandem glycosyltransferase catalysis reversibility and neoglycosylation.|journal=Organic Letters|date=Oct 5, 2012|volume=14|issue=19|pages=5086–9|pmid=22984807|doi=10.1021/ol3023374|pmc=3489467}}</ref> This enzymatic platform has been further advanced through glycosyltransferase evolution<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Williams|first1=GJ|last2=Zhang|first2=C|last3=Thorson|first3=JS|title=Expanding the promiscuity of a natural-product glycosyltransferase by directed evolution|journal=Nature Chemical Biology|date=Oct 2007|volume=3|issue=10|pages=657–62|pmid=17828251|doi=10.1038/nchembio.2007.28}}</ref> and capitalizing upon the discovery of the reversibility of glycosyltransferase-catalyzed reactions first discovered in the context of [[calicheamicin]] biosynthesis.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Zhang|first1=C|last2=Griffith|first2=BR|last3=Fu|first3=Q|last4=Albermann|first4=C|last5=Fu|first5=X|last6=Lee|first6=IK|last7=Li|first7=L|last8=Thorson|first8=JS|title=Exploiting the reversibility of natural product glycosyltransferase-catalyzed reactions|journal=Science|date=Sep 1, 2006|volume=313|issue=5791|pages=1291–4|pmid=16946071|doi=10.1126/science.1130028|bibcode=2006Sci...313.1291Z|s2cid=38072017}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gantt|first1=RW|last2=Peltier-Pain|first2=P|last3=Cournoyer|first3=WJ|last4=Thorson|first4=JS|title=Using simple donors to drive the equilibria of glycosyltransferase-catalyzed reactions|journal=Nature Chemical Biology|date=Aug 21, 2011|volume=7|issue=10|pages=685–91|pmid=21857660|doi=10.1038/nchembio.638|pmc=3177962}}</ref>


=== Neoglycorandomization ===
[[File:TOC graphic.gif|framed]]
Neoglycorandomization is a chemoselective glycodiversification method inspired by the alkoxyamine-based ‘neoglycosylation’ reaction first described Peri and Dumy.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Peri | first1 = F. | last2 = Dumy | first2 = P. | last3 = Mutter | first3 = M. | year = 1998 | title = Chemo- and stereoselective glycosylation of hydroxylamino derivatives: A versatile approach to glycoconjugates | journal = Tetrahedron | volume = 54 | issue = 40| pages = 12269–12278 | doi=10.1016/s0040-4020(98)00763-7}}</ref> This reaction proceeds via an oxy-iminium intermediate to ultimately provide the more thermodynamically-favored closed ring neoglycoside. The neoglycosylation reaction is compatible with a wide range of saccharide and aglycon functionality where neoglycoside anomeric stereospecificity is a thermodynamically-driven. Importantly, structural and functional studies reveal neoglycosides to serve as good mimics of their ''O''-glycosidic comparators. The first neoglycorandomization proof of concept focused upon [[digitoxin]] where the rapid generation and cancer cell line cytotoxicity screening of 78 digitoxigenin neoglycosides revealed unique analogs with improved anticancer activity and reduced potential for cardiotoxicity.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Langenhan|first1=JM|last2=Peters|first2=NR|last3=Guzei|first3=IA|last4=Hoffmann|first4=FM|last5=Thorson|first5=JS|title=Enhancing the anticancer properties of cardiac glycosides by neoglycorandomization|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|date=Aug 30, 2005|volume=102|issue=35|pages=12305–10|pmid=16105948|doi=10.1073/pnas.0503270102|pmc=1194917|bibcode=2005PNAS..10212305L|doi-access=free}}</ref> This platform has since been automated and used as an effective medicinal chemistry tool to modulate the properties of a range of [[natural products]] and [[pharmaceutical drugs]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Goff|first1=RD|last2=Thorson|first2=JS|title=Neoglycosylation and neoglycorandomization: Enabling tools for the discovery of novel glycosylated bioactive probes and early stage leads|journal=MedChemComm|date=Aug 1, 2014|volume=5|issue=8|pages=1036–1047|pmid=25071927|doi=10.1039/c4md00117f|pmc=4111257}}</ref>


=== Comparison ===
== ''Chemoenzymatic glycorandomization'' ==


Both chemoenzymatic glycorandomization and neoglycorandomization use free reducing sugars and unprotected aglycons and are thereby a notable advance over classical glycosylation methods. A notable advantage of the enzymatic approach is the use of the corresponding genes encoding for the permissive kinases, nucleotidyltransferases and/or glycosyltransferases for in vivo [[synthetic biology]] applications to afford in vivo glycorandomization.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Williams|first1=GJ|last2=Yang|first2=J|last3=Zhang|first3=C|last4=Thorson|first4=JS|title=Recombinant ''E. coli'' prototype strains for in vivo glycorandomization|journal=ACS Chemical Biology|date=Jan 21, 2011|volume=6|issue=1|pages=95–100|pmid=20886903|doi=10.1021/cb100267k|pmc=3025069}}</ref> However, it is important to note the enzymatic platform is dependent upon the permissivity of the enzymes employed. In contrast, the main hurdle to chemoselective neoglycorandomization is installation of the alkoxylamine handle. Unlike the enzymatic approach, the anomeric stereoselectivity of the chemoselective method depends upon the reducing sugar used and can, in some cases, lead to anomeric mixtures.
This is a biocatalytic approach which relies on the promiscuous enzymes to catalyze the coupling between sugars and aglycons. The three enzymes involved in this strategy are anomeric [[kinase]], [[nucleotidyltransferase]] and [[glycosyltransferase]]. Altering the substrate specificities of these enzymes will enhance their [[promiscuity]] to catalyze additional reactions which leads to diverse randomized sugar libraries, like sugar phosphate library, NDP sugar library and glycosylated sugar library.<ref name=a/> Modifying any one of these three enzymes will eventually lead to final glycorandomization of the natural products.(Figure adapted from <ref><ref name=a>Langenhan, J. M.; Griffith, B. R., Thorson, J. S. “Neoglycorandomization and chemoenzymatic glycorandomization: two complementary tools for natural product diversification”. ''J. Nat. Prod.'' '''2005''', ''68'', 1696-1711.</ref>)


== Uses ==
[[File:Chemoenzymatic glycorandomization.png|center]]


Glycorandomization is used in the [[pharmaceutical industry]] and academic community to alter glycosylation patterns of sugar-containing natural products or to append sugars to drugs/drug leads. It provides a fast way to investigate the effect of subtle sugar modification on the pharmacological properties of the natural products analogues,<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Zhang|first1=J|last2=Hughes|first2=RR|last3=Saunders|first3=MA|last4=Elshahawi|first4=SI|last5=Ponomareva|first5=LV|last6=Zhang|first6=Y|last7=Winchester|first7=SR|last8=Scott|first8=SA|last9=Sunkara|first9=M|last10=Morris|first10=AJ|last11=Prendergast|first11=MA|last12=Shaaban|first12=KA|last13=Thorson|first13=JS|title=Identification of neuroprotective spoxazomicin and oxachelin glycosides via chemoenzymatic glycosyl-scanning.|journal=Journal of Natural Products|date=28 December 2016|pmid=28029796|doi=10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00949|pmc=5337260|volume=80|issue=1|pages=12–18}}</ref> thus, affording a new approach to drug discovery.
Currently available strategies to alter the substrate specificities include [[directed evolution]] and structure-based engineering. Directed evolution<ref>Williams, G. J.; Zhang, C. ; Thorson, J. S. “Expanding the promiscuity of a natural-product glycosyltransferase by directed evolution”. ''Nat. Chem. Biol.'' '''2007''', ''3'', 657-662.</ref> takes advantage of natural selection to produce the desired promiscuous enzyme mutant via [[mutation]], [[recombination]], screening and selection. While structure-based engineering<ref>Thorson, J. S.; Barton, W. A.; Hoffmeister, D.; Albermann, C.; Nikolov, D. B. “Structure-based enzyme engineering and its impact on in vivo glycorandomization”. ''Chembiochem.'' '''2004''', ''5'', 16-25.</ref> modifies the [[active site]] pocket of the wild type enzyme to allow it accommodate unnatural substrates, thus, enhance the substrate flexibility of the enzyme.


== References ==
== ''Neoglycorandomization'' ==


{{reflist}}
This is a chemical approach using one step [[ligation]] between [[reducing sugar]] and secondary alkoxylamine containing [[aglycon]] to form glycosides which are termed as “neoglycosides”.<ref name=a/> <ref>Langenhan, J. M.; Peters, N. R.; Guzei, I. A.; Hoffmann, F. M.; Thorson, J. S. “Enhancing the anticancer properties of cardiac glycosides by neoglycorandomization”. ''Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.'' '''2005''', ''102'', 12305-12310.</ref>In this chemoselective ligation, two reactive functional groups selectively form covalent bond to produce oxy-iminium intermediate, which then undergoes ring closure immediately under physiological conditions. In this strategy, the only requirement is the installation of the alkoxylamine into the aglycon before glycosylation.


[[Category:Carbohydrate chemistry]]
[[File:Neoglycorandomization scheme.png|center]]
[[Category:Drug discovery]]

[[Category:Medicinal chemistry]]
= Comparison =
[[Category:Organic chemistry]]

[[Category:Pharmacognosy]]
Both chemoenzymatic glycorandomization and neoglycorandomization do not need any protected sugars and aglycons. However, the biocatalytic approach is limited by the availability of either the promiscuous enzymes or the engineering techniques to alter the substrate specificities of enzymes. Without enzymes involved, the chemical approach is only limited by the efficiency to install the alkoxylamine into the aglycon. However, the [[anomer]]ic selectivity of the chemical approach might be scrambled in some cases, depending on the structure of the involved reducing sugars.

= Uses =

Glycorandomization is widely used in [[pharmaceutical industry]] to alter the glycosylation patterns of the sugar-containing natural products. It provides a fast way to investigate the effect of subtle sugar modification towards the pharmacological properties of the natural products analogues, thus, afford a new alternative to the future drug discovery.

= References =

{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 17:13, 30 March 2022

Glycorandomization, is a drug discovery and drug development technology platform to enable the rapid diversification of bioactive small molecules, drug leads and/or approved drugs through the attachment of sugars. Initially developed as a facile method to manipulate carbohydrate substitutions of naturally occurring glycosides to afford the corresponding differentially glycosylated natural product libraries,[1][2][3] glycorandomization applications have expanded to include both small molecules (drug leads and approved drugs) and even macromolecules (proteins).[4] Also referred to as 'glycodiversification',[5] glycorandomization has led to the discovery of new glycoside analogs which display improvements in potency, selectivity and/or ADMET as compared to the parent molecule.

Classification

[edit]

The traditional method for attaching sugars to natural products, drugs or drug leads is by chemical glycosylation. This classical approach typically requires multiple protection/deprotection steps in addition to the key anomeric activation/coupling reaction which, depending upon the glycosyl donor/acceptor pair, can lead to a mixture of anomers. Unlike classical chemical glycosylation, glycorandomization methods are divergent (i.e., diverge from a common starting material, see divergent synthesis) and are not dependent upon sugar/aglycon protection/deprotection or sugar anomeric activation. Two complementary strategies to achieve glycorandomization/diversification have been developed: an enzyme-based strategy referred to as 'chemoenzymatic glycorandomization' and a chemoselective method known as 'neoglycorandomization'. Both methods start with free reducing sugars and a target aglycon to afford a library of compounds which differ solely by the sugars appended to the target natural product, drug or drug lead.

Chemoenzymatic glycorandomization

[edit]

Chemoenzymatic glycorandomization was inspired by the early pathway engineering work of Hutchinson and coworkers that suggested natural product glycosyltransferases were capable of utilizing non-native sugar nucleotide donors.[6] The initial platform for chemoenzymatic glycorandomization was based upon a set of two highly permissive sugar activation enzymes (a sugar anomeric kinase and sugar-1-phosphate nucleotidyltransferase) to afford sugar nucleotide libraries as donors for these promiscuous glycosyltransferases where the permissivity of the corresponding sugar kinase[7] and nucleotidyltransferase[8][9] was expanded by enzyme engineering and directed evolution. The first application of this three enzyme (kinase, nucleotidyltransferase and glycosyltransferase) strategy enabled the product of a set of >30 differentially glycosylated vancomycins, some members of which were further diversified chemoselectively by virtue of the installation of sugars bearing chemoselective handles.[10][11][12] This enzymatic platform has been further advanced through glycosyltransferase evolution[13] and capitalizing upon the discovery of the reversibility of glycosyltransferase-catalyzed reactions first discovered in the context of calicheamicin biosynthesis.[14][15]

Neoglycorandomization

[edit]

Neoglycorandomization is a chemoselective glycodiversification method inspired by the alkoxyamine-based ‘neoglycosylation’ reaction first described Peri and Dumy.[16] This reaction proceeds via an oxy-iminium intermediate to ultimately provide the more thermodynamically-favored closed ring neoglycoside. The neoglycosylation reaction is compatible with a wide range of saccharide and aglycon functionality where neoglycoside anomeric stereospecificity is a thermodynamically-driven. Importantly, structural and functional studies reveal neoglycosides to serve as good mimics of their O-glycosidic comparators. The first neoglycorandomization proof of concept focused upon digitoxin where the rapid generation and cancer cell line cytotoxicity screening of 78 digitoxigenin neoglycosides revealed unique analogs with improved anticancer activity and reduced potential for cardiotoxicity.[17] This platform has since been automated and used as an effective medicinal chemistry tool to modulate the properties of a range of natural products and pharmaceutical drugs.[18]

Comparison

[edit]

Both chemoenzymatic glycorandomization and neoglycorandomization use free reducing sugars and unprotected aglycons and are thereby a notable advance over classical glycosylation methods. A notable advantage of the enzymatic approach is the use of the corresponding genes encoding for the permissive kinases, nucleotidyltransferases and/or glycosyltransferases for in vivo synthetic biology applications to afford in vivo glycorandomization.[19] However, it is important to note the enzymatic platform is dependent upon the permissivity of the enzymes employed. In contrast, the main hurdle to chemoselective neoglycorandomization is installation of the alkoxylamine handle. Unlike the enzymatic approach, the anomeric stereoselectivity of the chemoselective method depends upon the reducing sugar used and can, in some cases, lead to anomeric mixtures.

Uses

[edit]

Glycorandomization is used in the pharmaceutical industry and academic community to alter glycosylation patterns of sugar-containing natural products or to append sugars to drugs/drug leads. It provides a fast way to investigate the effect of subtle sugar modification on the pharmacological properties of the natural products analogues,[20] thus, affording a new approach to drug discovery.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Yang, J.; Hoffmeister, D.; Liu, L.; Thorson, J. S. (2004). "Natural product glycorandomization". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 12 (7): 1577–1584. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2003.12.046. PMID 15112655.
  2. ^ Langenhan, JM; Griffith, BR; Thorson, JS (Nov 2005). "Neoglycorandomization and chemoenzymatic glycorandomization: Two complementary tools for natural product diversification". Journal of Natural Products. 68 (11): 1696–711. doi:10.1021/np0502084. PMID 16309329.
  3. ^ Griffith, BR; Langenhan, JM; Thorson, JS (Dec 2005). "'Sweetening' natural products via glycorandomization". Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 16 (6): 622–30. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2005.10.002. PMID 16226456.
  4. ^ Gantt, RW; Peltier-Pain, P; Thorson, JS (Oct 2011). "Enzymatic methods for glyco(diversification/randomization) of drugs and small molecules". Natural Product Reports. 28 (11): 1811–53. doi:10.1039/c1np00045d. PMID 21901218.
  5. ^ Thibodeaux, CJ; Melançon, CE; Liu, HW (Apr 26, 2007). "Unusual sugar biosynthesis and natural product glycodiversification". Nature. 446 (7139): 1008–16. Bibcode:2007Natur.446.1008T. doi:10.1038/nature05814. PMID 17460661. S2CID 4404027.
  6. ^ Madduri, K; Kennedy, J; Rivola, G; Inventi-Solari, A; Filippini, S; Zanuso, G; Colombo, AL; Gewain, KM; Occi, JL; MacNeil, DJ; Hutchinson, CR (Jan 1998). "Production of the antitumor drug epirubicin (4'-epidoxorubicin) and its precursor by a genetically engineered strain of Streptomyces peucetius". Nature Biotechnology. 16 (1): 69–74. doi:10.1038/nbt0198-69. PMID 9447597. S2CID 7304148.
  7. ^ Hoffmeister, D; Yang, J; Liu, L; Thorson, JS (Nov 11, 2003). "Creation of the first anomeric D/L-sugar kinase by means of directed evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (23): 13184–9. Bibcode:2003PNAS..10013184H. doi:10.1073/pnas.2235011100. PMC 263743. PMID 14612558.
  8. ^ Barton, WA; Lesniak, J; Biggins, JB; Jeffrey, PD; Jiang, J; Rajashankar, KR; Thorson, JS; Nikolov, DB (Jun 2001). "Structure, mechanism and engineering of a nucleotidylyltransferase as a first step toward glycorandomization". Nature Structural Biology. 8 (6): 545–51. doi:10.1038/88618. PMID 11373625. S2CID 25049013.
  9. ^ Moretti, R; Chang, A; Peltier-Pain, P; Bingman, CA; Phillips GN, Jr; Thorson, JS (Apr 15, 2011). "Expanding the nucleotide and sugar 1-phosphate promiscuity of nucleotidyltransferase RmlA via directed evolution". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286 (15): 13235–43. doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.206433. PMC 3075670. PMID 21317292.
  10. ^ Fu, X; Albermann, C; Jiang, J; Liao, J; Zhang, C; Thorson, JS (Dec 2003). "Antibiotic optimization via in vitro glycorandomization". Nature Biotechnology. 21 (12): 1467–9. doi:10.1038/nbt909. PMID 14608364. S2CID 2469387.
  11. ^ Fu, X; Albermann, C; Zhang, C; Thorson, JS (Apr 14, 2005). "Diversifying vancomycin via chemoenzymatic strategies". Organic Letters. 7 (8): 1513–5. doi:10.1021/ol0501626. PMID 15816740.
  12. ^ Peltier-Pain, P; Marchillo, K; Zhou, M; Andes, DR; Thorson, JS (Oct 5, 2012). "Natural product disaccharide engineering through tandem glycosyltransferase catalysis reversibility and neoglycosylation". Organic Letters. 14 (19): 5086–9. doi:10.1021/ol3023374. PMC 3489467. PMID 22984807.
  13. ^ Williams, GJ; Zhang, C; Thorson, JS (Oct 2007). "Expanding the promiscuity of a natural-product glycosyltransferase by directed evolution". Nature Chemical Biology. 3 (10): 657–62. doi:10.1038/nchembio.2007.28. PMID 17828251.
  14. ^ Zhang, C; Griffith, BR; Fu, Q; Albermann, C; Fu, X; Lee, IK; Li, L; Thorson, JS (Sep 1, 2006). "Exploiting the reversibility of natural product glycosyltransferase-catalyzed reactions". Science. 313 (5791): 1291–4. Bibcode:2006Sci...313.1291Z. doi:10.1126/science.1130028. PMID 16946071. S2CID 38072017.
  15. ^ Gantt, RW; Peltier-Pain, P; Cournoyer, WJ; Thorson, JS (Aug 21, 2011). "Using simple donors to drive the equilibria of glycosyltransferase-catalyzed reactions". Nature Chemical Biology. 7 (10): 685–91. doi:10.1038/nchembio.638. PMC 3177962. PMID 21857660.
  16. ^ Peri, F.; Dumy, P.; Mutter, M. (1998). "Chemo- and stereoselective glycosylation of hydroxylamino derivatives: A versatile approach to glycoconjugates". Tetrahedron. 54 (40): 12269–12278. doi:10.1016/s0040-4020(98)00763-7.
  17. ^ Langenhan, JM; Peters, NR; Guzei, IA; Hoffmann, FM; Thorson, JS (Aug 30, 2005). "Enhancing the anticancer properties of cardiac glycosides by neoglycorandomization". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 102 (35): 12305–10. Bibcode:2005PNAS..10212305L. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503270102. PMC 1194917. PMID 16105948.
  18. ^ Goff, RD; Thorson, JS (Aug 1, 2014). "Neoglycosylation and neoglycorandomization: Enabling tools for the discovery of novel glycosylated bioactive probes and early stage leads". MedChemComm. 5 (8): 1036–1047. doi:10.1039/c4md00117f. PMC 4111257. PMID 25071927.
  19. ^ Williams, GJ; Yang, J; Zhang, C; Thorson, JS (Jan 21, 2011). "Recombinant E. coli prototype strains for in vivo glycorandomization". ACS Chemical Biology. 6 (1): 95–100. doi:10.1021/cb100267k. PMC 3025069. PMID 20886903.
  20. ^ Zhang, J; Hughes, RR; Saunders, MA; Elshahawi, SI; Ponomareva, LV; Zhang, Y; Winchester, SR; Scott, SA; Sunkara, M; Morris, AJ; Prendergast, MA; Shaaban, KA; Thorson, JS (28 December 2016). "Identification of neuroprotective spoxazomicin and oxachelin glycosides via chemoenzymatic glycosyl-scanning". Journal of Natural Products. 80 (1): 12–18. doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00949. PMC 5337260. PMID 28029796.