Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HARA-KIRI: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 17:54, 30 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation if it has reliable sources after shooting begins. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HARA-KIRI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film has not started shooting yet, which means it fails WP:NFILMS, and there are no sources provided to show WP:GNG notability. I can't find any sources (though it's a tricky subject to Google for - there have been several films with similar titles). -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't meet WP:NFF and there is no prejudice to recreating this in the future should it prove to meet WP:GNG. Ubelowme (talk) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence that is happening, still less that it is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete along with the problems already mentioned when you look at the edits of the the article creator Julesgladys (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) it looks like we may have a WP:COI and/or selfpromotion situation occurring. MarnetteD | Talk 22:32, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the poster child of TOOSOON. Lack of sources speaking toward the project make deletion a no-brainer. I might have suggested a redirect to the film's director, but his own article is soon to be speedied as an unverifiable BLP violation. As for a redirect to the article on the producer, Jules Gladys, it is itself weak enough to likely end up at AFD as well. No coverage + no verifiability = Non-notable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment An identical version of the article called Hara-Kiri (2012 film) has been created. —Hue Sat Lum 17:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deleted, and the author warned. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:04, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Created again, speedy deleted again, author blocked for 24 hours. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. No prejudice against recreation if it has reliable sources after shooting begins. &nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 23:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 ===[[HARA-KIRI]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
 :{{la|HARA-KIRI}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HARA-KIRI|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 6#{{anchorencode:HARA-KIRI}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HARA-KIRI Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 8: / Line 14: @@
 *'''Delete'''.  Doesn't meet [[WP:NFF]] and there is no prejudice to recreating this in the future should it prove to meet [[WP:GNG]].  [[User:Ubelowme|Ubelowme]] ([[User talk:Ubelowme|talk]]) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * '''Delete'''. No evidence that is happening, still less that it is notable. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 22:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' along with the problems already mentioned when you look at the edits of the the article creator {{userlinks|Julesgladys}} it looks like we may have a [[WP:COI]] and/or selfpromotion situation occurring. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 22:32, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India|list of India-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)</small>
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)</small>
+* '''Delete''' as the poster child of [[WP:NYF|TOOSOON]]. Lack of sources speaking toward the project make deletion a no-brainer. I ''might'' have suggested a redirect to the film's director, but his own article is soon to be speedied as an unverifiable BLP violation. As for a redirect to the article on the producer, [[Jules Gladys]], it is itself weak enough to likely end up at AFD as well. No coverage + no verifiability = Non-notable.  '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<span style="color:blue;">Schmidt,</span>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 01:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
+* '''Comment''' An identical version of the article called [[Hara-Kiri (2012 film)]] has been created. &nbsp;—[[User:HueSatLum|<span style="color: #369">Hue</span>]][[User talk:HueSatLum|<span style="color: #6CF">Sat</span>]][[Special:Contributions/HueSatLum|<span style="color: #96C">Lum</span>]] 17:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
+*:Speedy deleted, and the author warned. -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 18:04, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
+*::Created again, speedy deleted again, author blocked for 24 hours. -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 19:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>