Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slog: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 06:15, 31 March 2022

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk 22:41, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Slog

neologism and dicdef. Delete.Ken

"Neologism" isn't a reason to delete. Kappa 18:13, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neologisms are considered a form of Original Research -Satori 18:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete neologism. Hamster Sandwich 19:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. One part neologism, one part copyvio dicdef. --Carnildo 23:40, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neologisms are a classic valid reason to delete pages. Nandesuka 16:52, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below[[Template:Vfd top|.]]  Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.
+This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below.  Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.
 <!--
 Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the VfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Delete'''.  One part neologism, one part copyvio dicdef. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] 23:40, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''.  Neologisms are a classic valid reason to delete pages. [[User:Nandesuka|Nandesuka]] 16:52, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page[[Template:Vfd bottom|.]]</div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>