Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Pritchett

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete both articles. Note to nominator, please refrain form adding a link to Kappa Kappa Gamma in the heading because it might lead to that article being deleted by accident. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:35, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Jennifer Pritchett and Kelly McNeil; both Kappa Kappa Gamma membercruft

Entire text of article is "Jennifer is a University of Texas badass student who will be graduating in Dec. of 05! She is sure to become something of merit and is definitely someone you should get to know while you can. She will be a very notable Pi Phi, and more so than any of the ones listed above." Damn it, this sort of stuff really needs to be a speedy. jglc | t | c 7 July 2005 18:43 (UTC)

Kelly McNeil is also a non-notable KKG member whose article was created by an anonIP with no wikification or outside validation. Looks like some sorority girls messing around. jglc | t | c 7 July 2005 18:47 (UTC)

• Delete all. I feel richer for knowing that Jennifer likes PB and mayo sandwiches. --Scimitar 7 July 2005 18:55 (UTC)
• Delete Kappa Kappa Gamma SUCKS!! Haha. No seriously, delete. --Moritz 7 July 2005 20:53 (UTC)
• Delete. A speedy would be fine (I won't tell if you don't). -R. fiend 7 July 2005 20:58 (UTC)
• Delete and vote on your choice of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal/1 or Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal/2 --Carnildo 7 July 2005 21:12 (UTC)
• Like, Delete Jennifer Pritchett, Kelly McNeil, and any other sororicruft, but keep Kappa Kappa Gamma. I know it's not part of the nomination, but since the article is Wikilinked in the header, I thought it was at first – just thought I'd point this out to anyone who's as dense as I am. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL July 8, 2005 01:26 (UTC)
  • My apologies: good catch. jglc | t | c 8 July 2005 02:17 (UTC)
• Delete nn sorority vanity. Obviously the sorority itself can stay (at USC we called it "Visa, Visa, Mastercard" ;) ), but these girls aren't notable. --Etacar11 8 July 2005 02:52 (UTC)
• "Keep" this because this sort of thing gives Wikipedia its charm. (Unsigned vote by Keldreth, user's only edit)
• Userfy. This could have been done without need for VfD. Speedy is not necessary, a little user education would be more sensible. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 05:11, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Are you suggesting these be userfied to User:63.161.169.68 and User:63.161.169.64? AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 12:12, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.