Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Bede Scharper: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 12:39, 1 April 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 17:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Bede Scharper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page reads like a resume. Page created by User:Prof2012 about a person who is a university professor? Please. I particularly like the nice Amazon links at the end of the article so you can buy his books. Recommend delete. Suttungr (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how/where this discussion proceeds (perhaps someone could guide me). But as the originator, I wish to argue for its value as a page describing a notable scholar/author on environment-social ethics and a popular TV commentator on religious, environment issues. De-link the Amazon links if need be, but the fact remains, TVO, The Agenda (an important Ontario-based news show), and CBC Tapestry (CBC radio) have him often as a panelist because of his value as a writer and scholar. He has also been nominated for "Who's Who" in Canada. Pof2012 —Preceding undated comment added 21:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. GS cites are 18, 7, 2. Far too low even for an indifferently cited field. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete for failing WP:PROF and WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 06:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. <span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</span> 17:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 ===[[Stephen Bede Scharper]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Stephen Bede Scharper}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Bede Scharper|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 14#{{anchorencode:Stephen Bede Scharper}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stephen_Bede_Scharper Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 11: / Line 17: @@
 Not sure how/where this discussion proceeds (perhaps someone could guide me). But as the originator, I wish to argue for its value as a page describing a notable scholar/author on environment-social ethics and a popular TV commentator on religious, environment issues. De-link the Amazon links if need be, but the fact remains, TVO, [[The Agenda]] (an important Ontario-based news show), and CBC [[Tapestry (CBC radio)]] have him often as a panelist because of his value as a writer and scholar. He has also been nominated for "Who's Who" in Canada. [[User:Prof2012|Pof2012]]  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 21:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 *'''Delete'''. GS cites are 18, 7, 2. Far too low even for an indifferently cited field. Too early. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC).
+*'''Delete''' for failing [[WP:PROF]] and [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Qworty|Qworty]] ([[User talk:Qworty|talk]]) 06:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>