Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shortcut.road: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Shortcut.road: {{confirmed}}
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>
<!--
If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.
-->
{| class="messagebox"
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Pending&action=edit&section=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Requests for checkuser]] (but will still appear here).
|}
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div>

=== Shortcut.road ===
=== Shortcut.road ===
* {{checkuser|Shortcut.road}}
* {{checkuser|Shortcut.road}}
Line 28: Line 38:
Let me end this nomination by saying I hope I'm wrong about this. I'd love to know that all the above are seperate individuals with a similar editing style. However, in order to be sure my mediation proceeds smoothly, it's important that all interested parties know for certain. Thanks for the help! [[User talk:Robertbcole|→]][[User:Robertbcole|<em style="color:gold;font-variant:small-caps">Bobby</em>]][[Special:Contributions/Robertbcole|←]] 18:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Let me end this nomination by saying I hope I'm wrong about this. I'd love to know that all the above are seperate individuals with a similar editing style. However, in order to be sure my mediation proceeds smoothly, it's important that all interested parties know for certain. Thanks for the help! [[User talk:Robertbcole|→]][[User:Robertbcole|<em style="color:gold;font-variant:small-caps">Bobby</em>]][[Special:Contributions/Robertbcole|←]] 18:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{confirmed}} all accounts. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 03:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
:{{confirmed}} all accounts. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 03:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br>
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:12, 4 April 2022

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shortcut.road}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Shortcut.road

[edit]
  • Code Letter: E

I'm mediating a case related to the Neil Bush article. You can find the complete record of the ongoing mediation here. Before we get too involved in mediation, i wanted to make sure that no sock puppets are unfarily swinging straw polls or the course of discussion. While doing some research on the users and ips in question, I noticed a couple of possible violations of the 3RR using the accounts. One such example can be seen through these four comparisons:

1. 11-01-06 at 21:01 - Shortcut.road reverts "to sane content".
2. 11-02-06 at 10:20 - BlazingBuggles reverts "to facts".
3. 11-02-06 at 11:42 - BlazingBuggles reverts.
4. 11-02-06 at 12:40 - Schlotzsman reverts.

Please note that this is only one such example where more than 3 reversions occured within 24 hours as a result of some combination of the above accounts. See the page history for other such instances. More evidence supporting sock-puppetry can be found by following the edit histories of each of the above users:

  • Shortcut.road - First post on 10/13. All posts relate to Neil Bush (including some relating to a Bush founded company). (Contribs)
  • BlazinBuggles - First post on 10/19. All subsequent posts related to Neil Bush. (Contribs)
  • Schlotzsman - First post on 10/25. With exception of a couple of minor edits, all posts related to Neil Bush. (Contribs)
  • AuntEthel - First post on 10/30. Majority of edits related to Neil Bush. (Contribs)
  • 67.101.67.107 - Only a handful of posts on this exact ip. (Contribs)
  • 70.113.208.174 - Has about 70 total edits. With the exception of some Halo related articles, all edits relate to Neil Bush. (Contribs)
  • 64.148.31.150 - One of the original participants in the devate. Only 4 edits total, all to Neil Bush related topics.(Contribs)
  • 64.148.31.150 - Late Addition. It was brought to my attention after posting that I neglected to add this ip. Similar edit history to several other folks listed here. (Contribs)

Let me end this nomination by saying I hope I'm wrong about this. I'd love to know that all the above are seperate individuals with a similar editing style. However, in order to be sure my mediation proceeds smoothly, it's important that all interested parties know for certain. Thanks for the help! Bobby 18:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed all accounts. Dmcdevit·t 03:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.