Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CorticoSpinal: Difference between revisions
reply |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude> |
|||
<!-- |
|||
If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name. |
|||
--> |
|||
{| class="messagebox" |
|||
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Requests for checkuser]] (but will still appear here). |
|||
|} |
|||
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;"> |
|||
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div> |
|||
<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --> |
|||
=== [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CorticoSpinal|CorticoSpinal]] === |
=== [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CorticoSpinal|CorticoSpinal]] === |
||
{{rfcu box|case=CorticoSpinal|filed=22:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)}} |
{{rfcu box|case=CorticoSpinal|filed=22:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)}} |
||
Line 22: | Line 34: | ||
* '''Supporting evidence:''' This case revolves around a persistent POV-pusher and disruptive editor problem on [[:Chiropractic]] and related pages and talk pages. |
* '''Supporting evidence:''' This case revolves around a persistent POV-pusher and disruptive editor problem on [[:Chiropractic]] and related pages and talk pages. |
||
[[User:{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}]] (<span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|<span title="Contributions: {{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}">contribs</span>]] '''·''' [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|<span title="Deleted contributions: {{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}">deleted contribs</span>]] '''·''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log/move?user={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}}} <span title="Page moves: {{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}">< |
[[User:{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}]] (<span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|<span title="Contributions: {{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}">contribs</span>]] '''·''' [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|<span title="Deleted contributions: {{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}">deleted contribs</span>]] '''·''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log/move?user={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}}} <span title="Page moves: {{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">page moves</span></span>] '''·''' [[Special:Blockip/{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|<span title="Block User:{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}">block user</span>]] '''·''' [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{urlencode:{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}}}}} <span title="Blocklog: {{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">block log</span></span>]{{#ifexist:{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}| '''·''' [[{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:CorticoSpinal}}|rfcu]]}}</span>) was indefinitely blocked by several admins ( [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ACorticoSpinal block log] ) and given several chances to reform, despite which he kept making disruptive contributions and was permanently blocked May 31. |
||
[[User:Fyslee]] has been tracking this case and believes that it's the continuation of an older one involving (see [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of CorticoSpinal]] including previously indef'ed [[User:{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}]] (<span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|<span title="Contributions: {{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}">contribs</span>]] '''·''' [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|<span title="Deleted contributions: {{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}">deleted contribs</span>]] '''·''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log/move?user={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}}} <span title="Page moves: {{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}">< |
[[User:Fyslee]] has been tracking this case and believes that it's the continuation of an older one involving (see [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of CorticoSpinal]] including previously indef'ed [[User:{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}]] (<span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|<span title="Contributions: {{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}">contribs</span>]] '''·''' [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|<span title="Deleted contributions: {{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}">deleted contribs</span>]] '''·''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log/move?user={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}}} <span title="Page moves: {{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">page moves</span></span>] '''·''' [[Special:Blockip/{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|<span title="Block User:{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}">block user</span>]] '''·''' [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}}}}} <span title="Blocklog: {{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">block log</span></span>]{{#ifexist:{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}| '''·''' [[{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:Marcbronson}}|rfcu]]}}</span>), [[User:{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}|{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}]] (<span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}|<span title="Contributions: {{ucfirst:EBDCM}}">contribs</span>]] '''·''' [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}|<span title="Deleted contributions: {{ucfirst:EBDCM}}">deleted contribs</span>]] '''·''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log/move?user={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}}} <span title="Page moves: {{ucfirst:EBDCM}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">page moves</span></span>] '''·''' [[Special:Blockip/{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}|<span title="Block User:{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}">block user</span>]] '''·''' [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{urlencode:{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}}}}} <span title="Blocklog: {{ucfirst:EBDCM}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">block log</span></span>]{{#ifexist:{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}| '''·''' [[{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:EBDCM}}|rfcu]]}}</span>), and briefly used account [[User:{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}|{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}]] (<span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}|<span title="Contributions: {{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}">contribs</span>]] '''·''' [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}|<span title="Deleted contributions: {{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}">deleted contribs</span>]] '''·''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log/move?user={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}}} <span title="Page moves: {{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">page moves</span></span>] '''·''' [[Special:Blockip/{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}|<span title="Block User:{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}">block user</span>]] '''·''' [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{urlencode:{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}}}}} <span title="Blocklog: {{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">block log</span></span>]{{#ifexist:{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}| '''·''' [[{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:ShirleyTO}}|rfcu]]}}</span>) |
||
[[User:QuackGuru]] believes that newer account [[User:{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}]] (<span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|<span title="Contributions: {{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}">contribs</span>]] '''·''' [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|<span title="Deleted contributions: {{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}">deleted contribs</span>]] '''·''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log/move?user={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}}} <span title="Page moves: {{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}">< |
[[User:QuackGuru]] believes that newer account [[User:{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}]] (<span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|<span title="Contributions: {{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}">contribs</span>]] '''·''' [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|<span title="Deleted contributions: {{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}">deleted contribs</span>]] '''·''' [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log/move?user={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}}} <span title="Page moves: {{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">page moves</span></span>] '''·''' [[Special:Blockip/{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|<span title="Block User:{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}">block user</span>]] '''·''' [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}}}}} <span title="Blocklog: {{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}"><span style="color:#002bb8;">block log</span></span>]{{#ifexist:{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}| '''·''' [[{{SITENAME}}:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:Soyuz113}}|rfcu]]}}</span>) is part of this. |
||
Given the duck test apparent connections in edit style and ongoing abuse, including multiple indef'ed apparent sockpuppets, a CU check appears warranted. [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 22:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC) |
Given the duck test apparent connections in edit style and ongoing abuse, including multiple indef'ed apparent sockpuppets, a CU check appears warranted. [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 22:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
Line 49: | Line 61: | ||
: He had no doubt been editing as [[Special:Contributions/User:Soyuz113|User:Soyuz113]] for some time, but here he blew his cover as [[User:Soyuz113]] (confirmed by AGK). Soyuz113 has never denied being CorticoSpinal, but has chosen to remain quiet, even though given the opportunity to privately explain himself. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soyuz113&diff=236080127&oldid=234501990 Read this version of his talk page.] |
: He had no doubt been editing as [[Special:Contributions/User:Soyuz113|User:Soyuz113]] for some time, but here he blew his cover as [[User:Soyuz113]] (confirmed by AGK). Soyuz113 has never denied being CorticoSpinal, but has chosen to remain quiet, even though given the opportunity to privately explain himself. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soyuz113&diff=236080127&oldid=234501990 Read this version of his talk page.] |
||
: I think that is pretty accurate and hope this straightens things out. -- <i><b |
: I think that is pretty accurate and hope this straightens things out. -- <i>[[User:Fyslee|<b style="color:#004000;">Fyslee</b>]]</i> / [[User talk:Fyslee|<b style="color:#990099; font-size:x-small;">talk</b>]] 05:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
Line 61: | Line 73: | ||
:: [[User:216.234.60.106]] made [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Corticopia&diff=225795886&oldid=225784602 a removal] from [[User:Corticopia]]'s talk page, which is a failure to log in, very typical of CorticoSpinal. |
:: [[User:216.234.60.106]] made [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Corticopia&diff=225795886&oldid=225784602 a removal] from [[User:Corticopia]]'s talk page, which is a failure to log in, very typical of CorticoSpinal. |
||
:: That CU case needs to be reviewed, instead of summarily dismissed, and if there is a connection, these cases need to be merged and this should be added to the evidence against the person behind all of this. -- <i><b |
:: That CU case needs to be reviewed, instead of summarily dismissed, and if there is a connection, these cases need to be merged and this should be added to the evidence against the person behind all of this. -- <i>[[User:Fyslee|<b style="color:#004000;">Fyslee</b>]]</i> / [[User talk:Fyslee|<b style="color:#990099; font-size:x-small;">talk</b>]] 14:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
'''Soyuz113 and associated IP blocked'''. I have anon-blocked the IP at the top of this report and indefinitely blocked Soyuz113. This is a fairly clear case of block evasion and sockpuppetry. Any further incidents should result in a community ban proposal. User blocked and notified.[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASoyuz113&diff=236710852&oldid=236570057] [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] ([[User talk:Vassyana|talk]]) 19:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC) |
'''Soyuz113 and associated IP blocked'''. I have anon-blocked the IP at the top of this report and indefinitely blocked Soyuz113. This is a fairly clear case of block evasion and sockpuppetry. Any further incidents should result in a community ban proposal. User blocked and notified.[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASoyuz113&diff=236710852&oldid=236570057] [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] ([[User talk:Vassyana|talk]]) 19:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
*{{Clerk request}} Send most of this to the talk page, please. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 01:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: I'm not seeing any real evidence here - just ludicrous circumstantial stuff like use of the word ''spam''. Where is the evidence that Soyuz113 is any of these other users or that he has been editing in a way which merits an indefinite block? Was there a proper checkuser made or is it all just prejudice and guesswork? [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 18:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*{{Clerknote}} {{done}} [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 05:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*{{inconclusive}} The accounts are too old for comparison, except for Soyuz113 who is similar to some of the listed IP addresses. It looks like Soyuz113 is blocked on behavioral similarities, which seems reasonable. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 01:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:: You need to do your homework better. It is CorticoSpinal/Soyuz113 himself who is using the words [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soyuz113&diff=prev&oldid=236548764 spam] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soyuz113&diff=next&oldid=236569596 wikistalking], with these aggressive and accusatory links in his edit summary: [[WP:HARASS]] [[WP:CIVIL]]. This is obviously a very negative way to deal with such accusations. As I advised him the last time he was indef blocked - offense is NOT the best defense in this type of situation. This guy has an aggressive streak that affects his editing style, his encounters with editors who hold opposing POV, and his reactions to accusations. This is all rather unfortunate from my POV, since we share many POV about chiropractic, but certainly not about what Wikipedia's NPOV policy requires of article content. Too bad. |
|||
:: Now if he had contacted an admin without any sockpuppetry and requested that his case be reviewed through an [[WP:RfC/U]], we might be in an entirely different place today. Instead he broke many rules here by disruptive sock puppetry (in contrast to the legitimate and allowed use of sock puppets in certain situations). In this type of case there is no mercy. We're dealing with an experienced user who is just using a new username and a slight change in terminology ("chiropracty"), which is far less than what some amateur sockpuppets do when they create several "good hand bad hand" socks that battle each other, with the end result being what the sockmaster really wants. Then the "bad" sock may get blocked, and the "good" sock stays at work with no one suspecting they're dealing with a blocked user. Sockmasters can be pretty sneaky. The last one I exposed was [[:Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Signsolid|Signsolid]] & [[:Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Signsolid|Signsolid]]. That was quite the case! |
|||
:: BTW, why are you consistently on the side of (and defending) fringe POV pushers and their socks? I think you need to rethink your relationship to Wikipedia and why you are here. This type of activity only brings more unwanted attention on all your edits and activities here. If you would learn to cooperate with editors who hold opposing POV and follow NPOV, we could all work together at the same editing table and collaborate to ensure that all significant POV are presented properly in articles. This is supposed to be a collaborative effort, not a battle. -- <i><b><font color="004000">[[User:Fyslee|Fyslee]]</font></b></i> / <b><font color="990099" size="1">[[User talk:Fyslee|talk]]</font></b> 03:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div> |
|||
:::Either way, a checkuser should be conducted. I agree with Colonel Warden that an edit summary saying "remove spam" is fairly circumstantial. - [[User:DigitalC|DigitalC]] ([[User talk:DigitalC|talk]]) 04:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
</br> |
|||
::::I am baffled by the perverse focus on an example used for nothing more than illustrating "flippancy". Both accounts edit the same topics, sharing the exact same view, pushing the same type of content changes, with the same attitude and approach, and even edit from the same IP. (For example, both users made it clear they wish to include material indicating the effectiveness of manual manipulation for neck issues, remove spinal manipulation information from the chiropractic article, and sharply reduce the amount of information about a portion of chiropractors opposing vaccination.) Technical evidence does not negate the possibility of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry, especially in the face of other evidence. Soyuz113 started off using full edit summaries and diving immediately into the altmed controversy with a principal focus on chiropractic.[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&limit=50&contribs=user&target=Soyuz113] The account is at best used as a "bad hand" account or is a proxy for blocked users (meatpuppet). [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] ([[User talk:Vassyana|talk]]) 06:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
</noinclude> |
|||
::::: Edits concerning spinal or neck manipulation are to be expected in the [[Chiropractic]] article since this is the essential nature of the topic and so this is not evidence of any wrong-doing. This page is a request for a checkuser. Please clarify whether a checkuser has been performed and what its findings were. My impression is that it has not but perhaps I misunderstand the account above. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 09:20, 8 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::::: I am not a checkuser. I noted my block for the record. I apologize for any confusion. I should have been clear on that point in my posting. You are correct in pointing out the purpose of this page, so we should continue this discussion at the [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/CorticoSpinal|corresponding SSP page]] or my talk page. [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] ([[User talk:Vassyana|talk]]) 15:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:36, 4 April 2022
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk Filed: 22:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC) |
- CorticoSpinal (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Soyuz113 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older:
- Marcbronson (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- EBDCM (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ShirleyTO (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: F
- Supporting evidence: This case revolves around a persistent POV-pusher and disruptive editor problem on Chiropractic and related pages and talk pages.
CorticoSpinal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu) was indefinitely blocked by several admins ( block log ) and given several chances to reform, despite which he kept making disruptive contributions and was permanently blocked May 31.
User:Fyslee has been tracking this case and believes that it's the continuation of an older one involving (see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of CorticoSpinal including previously indef'ed Marcbronson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), EBDCM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu), and briefly used account ShirleyTO (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
User:QuackGuru believes that newer account Soyuz113 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is part of this.
Given the duck test apparent connections in edit style and ongoing abuse, including multiple indef'ed apparent sockpuppets, a CU check appears warranted. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- I would like to clarify a few points. I don't recall that User:Marcbronson or his next username User:EBDCM were ever blocked. They created alot of problems and CorticoSpinal simply abandoned them one after the other. During this time he edited from several IPs and often forgot to log in.
- It is under his User:CorticoSpinal username that he got indef blocked three times. That's quite the accomplishment! He then used the following to evade blocks:
- ShirleyTO (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Soyuz113 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Regarding 208.101.118.33:
- CorticoSpinal often edited under IPs and forgot to sign in:
- He had no doubt been editing as User:Soyuz113 for some time, but here he blew his cover as User:Soyuz113 (confirmed by AGK). Soyuz113 has never denied being CorticoSpinal, but has chosen to remain quiet, even though given the opportunity to privately explain himself. Read this version of his talk page.
- I think that is pretty accurate and hope this straightens things out. -- Fyslee / talk 05:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Another interesting case is found at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Corticopia. While the similarity in usernames isn't conclusive evidence, and there don't seem to be any overlaps in articles or subject matter, block evading socks often edit in different areas and there are similarities as regards edit warring, verbal abuse of opposing editors, and location. Together this seems more than a coincidental collection of similarities. Here are the links to check:
- Corticopia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Depoyster.dick (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User:216.234.60.106 made a removal from User:Corticopia's talk page, which is a failure to log in, very typical of CorticoSpinal.
- That CU case needs to be reviewed, instead of summarily dismissed, and if there is a connection, these cases need to be merged and this should be added to the evidence against the person behind all of this. -- Fyslee / talk 14:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Soyuz113 and associated IP blocked. I have anon-blocked the IP at the top of this report and indefinitely blocked Soyuz113. This is a fairly clear case of block evasion and sockpuppetry. Any further incidents should result in a community ban proposal. User blocked and notified.[1] Vassyana (talk) 19:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Clerk assistance requested: Send most of this to the talk page, please. Thatcher 01:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Clerk note: Done Tiptoety talk 05:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Inconclusive The accounts are too old for comparison, except for Soyuz113 who is similar to some of the listed IP addresses. It looks like Soyuz113 is blocked on behavioral similarities, which seems reasonable. Thatcher 01:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.