Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Hannover-Buchholz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Kreuz Hannover-Buchholz

Kreuz Hannover-Buchholz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. One of a number of non-notable interchanges, which some feel are notable simply because they are named. No evidence of coming close to passing WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

• Delete—as written, this fails to meet WP:GNG. Imzadi 1979 → 14:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
• Keep: There is no consensus for the deletion of these German Autobahn interchanges articles as a block, and insufficient time allocated by the AfD process for editors to research their GNG individually. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Oranienburg and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Duisburg. One of the Autobahns passing through this interchange is a special Autobahn providing access to the fairgrounds of the internationally important Hannover Fair (the world's biggest industrial fair), and, as such, is, amongst other things, converted to a one way route at certain times of the year. Bahnfrend (talk) 10:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

• delete No claim of notability, and there is certainly no consensus to keep these as a group. Mangoe (talk) 03:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:RUNOFTHEMILL cloverleaf interchange that fails GNG. As all Autobahn interchanges are named, there cannot be any special presumption of notability as there would be for named interchanges in other countries, and there is no evidence of notability otherwise as well. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
• delete interchanges are not inherently notable. This one doesn't meet WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 11:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.