Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greece–Mexico relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:49, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Greece–Mexico relations

Greece–Mexico relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No independent sources provide significant coverage of this relationship. The one salient fact, the presence of embassies, is already recorded at Diplomatic missions of Greece and of Mexico. The diaspora group has its own article - Greek Mexican. Biruitorul ^Talk 06:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

• Delete This article eloquently says nothing. --BlueSquadronRaven 22:59, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. We are an almanac-like reference work, and this is an almanac entry. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Note to closing admin this user has posted almost identical comments at other AFDs including [1] , [2] ,[3] , [4], [5] [6] LibStar (talk) 01:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

• • We're also not a directory, and multiple, independent sources are still required. - Biruitorul ^Talk 04:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

You are confusing a directory with an almanac entry. A telephone book is a directory, an almanac is written in prose. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

First we're an encyclopedia, then an almanac, now a work of prose. Anyone else as confused as I am? --BlueSquadronRaven 04:47, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. --Yannismarou (talk) 07:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
• Per Wikipedia PIllar I: "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia incorporating elements of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers." Almanac entries just need to exist, such as townships. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:06, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
• Neutral. Overall I am a supporter of such types of articles, however, I feel that as of now this one is a little pointless. We don't need a page that says that each have consulates in each other's countries. I feel its a keep because there is probably some relevant, notable information out there that could be added. Without this information though, I would recommend deletion. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 21:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Not a jot. Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 12:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Subject is notable, like most articles just needs expansion.Dr. Blofeld (talk) 15:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
• NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, the first of many comprimise merges. Eventually these articles will be merged into the "diplomacy of..." articles.
  PLEASE HELP US Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. So much energy has been wasted in these arguments, which could be used on merging these stub articles onto one page. I strongly encourage the nominator to withdraw the AFD nomination. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
• Delete this unsourced stub of no established notability and none establishable by me since i fail to find any reliable sources that discuss this relationship in the depth to meet any of our notability guidelines. An additional list of non-notable unsourced content doesn't obviate the need to get rid of the unsourced, non-notable content at hand.Bali ultimate (talk) 18:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
• Delete only real relations on the football field. Mexico usually deals with Greece in a Mexico-EU context. LibStar (talk) 01:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.