Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas D. Stauffer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:58, 13 May 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas D. Stauffer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has published a few books, but only real claim of notability is being a "featured speaker" on radio programs. Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO. I suspect a conflict of interest as well given the page creator's edits. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Three of the published works are hardbacks and two of them are over 400 pages each in their fifth printings. Along with being on over 100 radio stations nationwide, being selected by Oxford University Press, something that many other parties found on wikipedia cannot lay claim to, is quite significant. Some of the material produced is certainly controversial and those most anxious to criticize and delete would probably like the material removed because of their conflicts of interest.

I am new to Wikipedia; however, I wish to "follow the rules and guidelines" when these matters are brought to my attention. It is a great source of information. This page was added by someone years ago and deleted in late 2009. I simply revived the page in order to show from where some of the source information is derived as I quote on other pages within Wikipedia. If anything is self serving, my desire is for it to be removed. 68.207.213.125 (talk) 01:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:16, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 07:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable even if all claims are true. Not apparent notice of him by third parties. EEng (talk) 17:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 05:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 ===[[Douglas D. Stauffer]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
-:{{la|Douglas D. Stauffer}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas D. Stauffer|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 December 7#{{anchorencode:Douglas D. Stauffer}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
+:{{la|Douglas D. Stauffer}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas D. Stauffer|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 December 14#{{anchorencode:Douglas D. Stauffer}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
 :({{Find sources|Douglas D. Stauffer}})
-Has published a few books, but only real claim of notability is being a "featured speaker" on radio programs. Doesn't appear to meet [[WP:BIO]]. I suspect a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] as well given the page creator's edits. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
+Has published a few books, but only real claim of notability is being a "featured speaker" on radio programs. Doesn't appear to meet [[WP:BIO]]. I suspect a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] as well given the page creator's edits. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color:#D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 Three of the published works are hardbacks and two of them are over 400 pages each in their fifth printings. Along with being on over 100 radio stations nationwide, being selected by Oxford University Press, something that many other parties found on wikipedia cannot lay claim to, is quite significant. Some of the material produced is certainly controversial and those most anxious to criticize and delete would probably like the material removed because of their conflicts of interest.
-I am new to Wikipedia; however, I wish to "follow the rules and guidelines" when these matters are brought to my attention. It is a great source of information. This page was added by someone years ago and deleted in late 2009. I simply revived the page in order to show from where some of the source information is derived as I quote on other pages within Wikipedia. If anything is self serving, my desire is for it to be removed. Doug
+I am new to Wikipedia; however, I wish to "follow the rules and guidelines" when these matters are brought to my attention. It is a great source of information. This page was added by someone years ago and deleted in late 2009. I simply revived the page in order to show from where some of the source information is derived as I quote on other pages within Wikipedia. If anything is self serving, my desire is for it to be removed. [[Special:Contributions/68.207.213.125|68.207.213.125]] ([[User talk:68.207.213.125|talk]]) 01:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
-BTW James: For some reason the listing "Douglas D. Stauffer" shows up under the "D" when alphabetized rather than under the "S" in the categories...can this be easily remedied? Sorry for being so new at this.  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bible1611man|Bible1611man]] ([[User talk:Bible1611man|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bible1611man|contribs]]) 16:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Christianity|list of Christianity-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)</small>
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)</small>
+<hr style="width:55%;" />
+:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 03:16, 14 December 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
+*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Delete''' Not notable even if all claims are true.  Not apparent notice of him by third parties. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 17:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>