Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Haden (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''keep'''; consensus is that she scrapes by with an independent claim of notability. <span style="font-family: Maiandra GD">[[User:Mojo Hand|Mojo Hand]] ''([[User talk:Mojo Hand|talk]])''</span> 04:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Tanya Haden]]=== |
===[[Tanya Haden]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Haden}}</ul></div> |
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Haden}}</ul></div> |
||
:{{la|Tanya Haden}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Haden (3rd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 20#{{anchorencode:Tanya Haden}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tanya_Haden_(3rd_nomination) Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Tanya Haden}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Haden (3rd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 20#{{anchorencode:Tanya Haden}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tanya_Haden_(3rd_nomination) Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources|Tanya Haden}}) |
:({{Find sources|Tanya Haden}}) |
||
Though I am not a big fan of the [[WP:BLP1E]] argument, it seems clear to me that this woman is not notable outside of being married to [[Jack Black]], and thus that this article is indeed a BLP1E. If there is any content here that cannot already be found at her husband's article, we should just merge it there (since it will almost certainly be about Black marrying her). [[User:Jinkinson|< |
Though I am not a big fan of the [[WP:BLP1E]] argument, it seems clear to me that this woman is not notable outside of being married to [[Jack Black]], and thus that this article is indeed a BLP1E. If there is any content here that cannot already be found at her husband's article, we should just merge it there (since it will almost certainly be about Black marrying her). [[User:Jinkinson|<span style="color:green;">Jinkinson</span>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<span style="color:blue;">talk to me</span>]] 04:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
:'''Update''': I have just realized that this article has been nominated for deletion twice before. The first discussion closed as "no consensus", and the second was speedy closed because it was made too soon after the first. In any case, in these previous debates, some voters observed, correctly, that notability is [[WP:NOTINHERITED|not inherited]] from being related to someone who is famous. [[User:Jinkinson|< |
:'''Update''': I have just realized that this article has been nominated for deletion twice before. The first discussion closed as "no consensus", and the second was speedy closed because it was made too soon after the first. In any case, in these previous debates, some voters observed, correctly, that notability is [[WP:NOTINHERITED|not inherited]] from being related to someone who is famous. [[User:Jinkinson|<span style="color:green;">Jinkinson</span>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<span style="color:blue;">talk to me</span>]] 04:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Jinkinson|< |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Jinkinson|<span style="color:green;">Jinkinson</span>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<span style="color:blue;">talk to me</span>]] 04:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
* I've been searching, but it is tough to find anything about her other than articles about her wedding or her pregnancies. I did find [http://books.google.ca/books?id=l5AJAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Tanya+Haden%22&dq=%22Tanya+Haden%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=H6jcUu3JG_K_sQTOj4H4Cg&redir_esc=y a little about her] in ''[[Musician (magazine)|Musician]]'' (issue 212–217), 1996. < |
* I've been searching, but it is tough to find anything about her other than articles about her wedding or her pregnancies. I did find [http://books.google.ca/books?id=l5AJAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Tanya+Haden%22&dq=%22Tanya+Haden%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=H6jcUu3JG_K_sQTOj4H4Cg&redir_esc=y a little about her] in ''[[Musician (magazine)|Musician]]'' (issue 212–217), 1996. [[User:Paul Erik|<span style="font-family:Comic sans MS;">Paul Erik</span>]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Paul Erik|<span style="color:blue;">(talk)</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|<span style="color:green;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup></small> 05:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' Member of multiple seemingly notable groups: The Hayden Triplets [http://www.rollingstone.com/music/videos/the-haden-triplets-spin-a-sisterly-folk-spell-premiere-20140113], Let's Go Sailing [http://www.allmusic.com/artist/lets-go-sailing-mn0001918807/biography]; also associated with [[Charlie Haden]] and [[that dog]] as noted by the ''Musician'' article cited above. [[Special:Contributions/78.19.9.121|78.19.9.121]] ([[User talk:78.19.9.121|talk]]) 17:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Member of multiple seemingly notable groups: The Hayden Triplets [http://www.rollingstone.com/music/videos/the-haden-triplets-spin-a-sisterly-folk-spell-premiere-20140113], Let's Go Sailing [http://www.allmusic.com/artist/lets-go-sailing-mn0001918807/biography]; also associated with [[Charlie Haden]] and [[that dog]] as noted by the ''Musician'' article cited above. [[Special:Contributions/78.19.9.121|78.19.9.121]] ([[User talk:78.19.9.121|talk]]) 17:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''': I understand the rationale for the nomination, but i think she makes it thru WP:GNG. what's a bit crazy is that due to her celebrity marriage, it crowds out most of her other coverage, and if she wasn't married to black we'd probably find it easier to say she's notable. But this is certainly a better case for notability than something like [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Larson (3rd nomination)]], where the connection to the celebrity is the only real argument for meeting GNG. (Larson was later deleted at a fourth afd.)--'''[[User:Milowent|Milowent]]''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">[[Special:Contributions/Milowent|has]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">[[User talk:Milowent|spoken]]</span></sup></small> 17:28, 24 January 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''': I understand the rationale for the nomination, but i think she makes it thru WP:GNG. what's a bit crazy is that due to her celebrity marriage, it crowds out most of her other coverage, and if she wasn't married to black we'd probably find it easier to say she's notable. But this is certainly a better case for notability than something like [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Larson (3rd nomination)]], where the connection to the celebrity is the only real argument for meeting GNG. (Larson was later deleted at a fourth afd.)--'''[[User:Milowent|Milowent]]''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">[[Special:Contributions/Milowent|has]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">[[User talk:Milowent|spoken]]</span></sup></small> 17:28, 24 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Hopefully the additions that were just made will help to clarify her career as a visual artist, cellist, and vocalist apart from her marriage to Jack Black. |
*'''Keep''' Hopefully the additions that were just made will help to clarify her career as a visual artist, cellist, and vocalist apart from her marriage to Jack Black. 21:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 05:24, 17 May 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; consensus is that she scrapes by with an independent claim of notability. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Tanya Haden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Though I am not a big fan of the WP:BLP1E argument, it seems clear to me that this woman is not notable outside of being married to Jack Black, and thus that this article is indeed a BLP1E. If there is any content here that cannot already be found at her husband's article, we should just merge it there (since it will almost certainly be about Black marrying her). Jinkinson talk to me 04:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Update: I have just realized that this article has been nominated for deletion twice before. The first discussion closed as "no consensus", and the second was speedy closed because it was made too soon after the first. In any case, in these previous debates, some voters observed, correctly, that notability is not inherited from being related to someone who is famous. Jinkinson talk to me 04:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 04:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- I've been searching, but it is tough to find anything about her other than articles about her wedding or her pregnancies. I did find a little about her in Musician (issue 212–217), 1996. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Member of multiple seemingly notable groups: The Hayden Triplets [1], Let's Go Sailing [2]; also associated with Charlie Haden and that dog as noted by the Musician article cited above. 78.19.9.121 (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: I understand the rationale for the nomination, but i think she makes it thru WP:GNG. what's a bit crazy is that due to her celebrity marriage, it crowds out most of her other coverage, and if she wasn't married to black we'd probably find it easier to say she's notable. But this is certainly a better case for notability than something like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Larson (3rd nomination), where the connection to the celebrity is the only real argument for meeting GNG. (Larson was later deleted at a fourth afd.)--Milowent • hasspoken 17:28, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Hopefully the additions that were just made will help to clarify her career as a visual artist, cellist, and vocalist apart from her marriage to Jack Black. 21:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.