Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul C. McKain: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 01:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
===[[Paul C. McKain]]===
===[[Paul C. McKain]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Paul C. McKain}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul C. McKain|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 15#{{anchorencode:Paul C. McKain}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paul_C._McKain Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Paul C. McKain}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul C. McKain|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 15#{{anchorencode:Paul C. McKain}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paul_C._McKain Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Paul C. McKain}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Paul C. McKain}})
[[WP:BLP]] of a person notable primarily as a non-winning candidate for political office. While this tries harder than usual to show preexisting notability for other endeavours independent of his candidacy, it misses the boat for [[WP:RS|reliably sourcing]] that -- his career in business is sourced entirely to patent directories, deadlinks and his own self-written content about himself rather than to any media coverage about him -- which means it hasn't been properly demonstrated that he passes our inclusion rules for businesspeople. And nothing about the candidacy section suggests any reason why he could be considered more notable than the norm for non-winning candidates, either. '''Delete'''. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 00:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
[[WP:BLP]] of a person notable primarily as a non-winning candidate for political office. While this tries harder than usual to show preexisting notability for other endeavours independent of his candidacy, it misses the boat for [[WP:RS|reliably sourcing]] that -- his career in business is sourced entirely to patent directories, deadlinks and his own self-written content about himself rather than to any media coverage about him -- which means it hasn't been properly demonstrated that he passes our inclusion rules for businesspeople. And nothing about the candidacy section suggests any reason why he could be considered more notable than the norm for non-winning candidates, either. '''Delete'''. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 00:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - I find the nominator's arguments convincing. I have reviewed the notability claims (aside from political candidacy), and found them wanting. Belongs on ballotpedia, not wikipedia. [[User:Fieari|Fieari]] ([[User talk:Fieari|talk]]) 02:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - I find the nominator's arguments convincing. I have reviewed the notability claims (aside from political candidacy), and found them wanting. Belongs on ballotpedia, not wikipedia. [[User:Fieari|Fieari]] ([[User talk:Fieari|talk]]) 02:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politicians|list of Politicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 02:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politicians|list of Politicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 02:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Florida|list of Florida-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 02:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Florida|list of Florida-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 02:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' non-notable unelected politician.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 03:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as he would've only been notable had he actually assumed the House of Representatives position, but since he had not and there's nothing else convincing, there's nothing to save. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 00:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 08:46, 24 May 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul C. McKain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable primarily as a non-winning candidate for political office. While this tries harder than usual to show preexisting notability for other endeavours independent of his candidacy, it misses the boat for reliably sourcing that -- his career in business is sourced entirely to patent directories, deadlinks and his own self-written content about himself rather than to any media coverage about him -- which means it hasn't been properly demonstrated that he passes our inclusion rules for businesspeople. And nothing about the candidacy section suggests any reason why he could be considered more notable than the norm for non-winning candidates, either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 00:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I find the nominator's arguments convincing. I have reviewed the notability claims (aside from political candidacy), and found them wanting. Belongs on ballotpedia, not wikipedia. Fieari (talk) 02:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.