Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nextiva (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:53, 24 May 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nextiva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unbelievable and unwisely accepted from AfC, because I presume the user never examined the history logs, where it has been deleted multiple times, and it also went to Deletion Review not once but twice where it was closed as no restoring; now that the article has been restored, it's basically still an advertisement in that it only shows trivial and unconvincing PR sources as "news" and the information itself is PR also. Also, my own searches are then finding nothing but said PR and trivial mentions. Delete and Salt again please. SwisterTwister talk 18:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I wrote the article on Tomas Gorny the other month. In doing so, I also researched Nextiva as he is the founder of that company. The company is not notable and does not meet WP:N. Any real mention of the company (non PR) is just piggy backing off of the owner's notability.CerealKillerYum (talk) 17:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt Not enough independent coverage in RS to pass NORG. The article has been moved to Draft:Nextiva which is also at MfD. 4 deletion discussions plus deletion reviews is enough wasted time. If someone wants to recreate it then asking an admin is not much of a burden compared to the amount of time that would be wasted in a 5th AfD. Jbh ^Talk 16:47, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt to avoid a 5th discussion. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :{{la|Nextiva}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nextiva (3rd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 29#{{anchorencode:Nextiva}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nextiva_(3rd_nomination) Stats]</span>)
 :({{Find sources AFD|Nextiva}})
-Unbelievable and unwisely accepted from AfC, because I presume the user never [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&page=Nextiva examined the] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3AAllPages&from=Articles+for+deletion%2FNextiva&to=Articles+for+deletion%2FNextiva+%289z%29&namespace=4 history logs], where it has been deleted multiple times, and it also went to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2016_March_1#Nextiva Deletion Review not once] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2016_May_16#Nextiva but twice] where it was closed as no restoring; now that the article has been restored, it's basically still an advertisement in that it only shows trivial and unconvincing PR sources as "news" and the information itself is PR also. Also, my own searches are then finding nothing but said PR and trivial mentions. '''Delete and Salt''' again please. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 18:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
+Unbelievable and unwisely accepted from AfC, because I presume the user never [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&page=Nextiva examined the] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3AAllPages&from=Articles+for+deletion%2FNextiva&to=Articles+for+deletion%2FNextiva+%289z%29&namespace=4 history logs], where it has been deleted multiple times, and it also went to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2016_March_1#Nextiva Deletion Review not once] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2016_May_16#Nextiva but twice] where it was closed as no restoring; now that the article has been restored, it's basically still an advertisement in that it only shows trivial and unconvincing PR sources as "news" and the information itself is PR also. Also, my own searches are then finding nothing but said PR and trivial mentions. '''Delete and Salt''' again please. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 18:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - I wrote the article on [[Tomas Gorny]] the other month. In doing so, I also researched Nextiva as he is the founder of that company. The company is not notable and does not meet [[WP:N]]. Any real mention of the company (non PR) is just piggy backing off of the owner's notability.[[User:CerealKillerYum|CerealKillerYum]] ([[User talk:CerealKillerYum|talk]]) 17:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 *'''Delete and Salt''' Not enough independent coverage in RS to pass NORG. The article has been moved to [[Draft:Nextiva]] which is also at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nextiva|MfD]]. 4 deletion discussions plus deletion reviews is enough wasted time. If someone wants to recreate it then asking an admin is not much of a burden compared to the amount of time that would be wasted in a ''5th'' AfD. [[User:Jbhunley|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:14pt;color:#886600">J</span><span style="font-family:Lucida Calligraphy;font-size:10pt;color:#886600">bh</span>]][[User_talk:Jbhunley|<span style="color: #00888F"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 16:47, 1 October 2016 (UTC)