Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Erick Lozada: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 01:47, 5 June 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Erick Lozada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable (according to Wikipedia's definition of the term) writer who was heavily involved in creation of the article and has resurrected it after previous deletions. Users and IP's editing this article have also inserted links to this entry into other entries (such as Notable People from Quezon). Also appears that several users and IPs are socks for the author, which is the subject of the entry. ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 02:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on the merits. The sources indicated either don't refer to the subject at all or confirm facts about the subject - he is a blogger, for example - but none of them actually offer the kind of coverage we require to show notability. There are no sources offered, nor can I find any, that actually talk about the subject himself. This may be a case where the Usual Caveats apply, as the subject seems to be early in his career; if he publishes notable work, or if he finds himself covered in reliable sources as required by WP:GNG, then an article may become appropriate. But not yet. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The references given are either not independent, or not significant reliable sources, or do not actually mention the subject. While you are at it I would recommend you also nominate for deletion the article about his blog, Pinoy Gossip Boy, for the same reasons. --MelanieN (talk) 23:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub>[[User talk:The Bushranger|<span style="color:maroon;">One ping only</span>]]</sub> 03:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 ===[[Aaron Erick Lozada]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Aaron Erick Lozada}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Erick Lozada|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 October 28#{{anchorencode:Aaron Erick Lozada}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
 :({{Find sources|Aaron Erick Lozada}})
-Non-notable (according to Wikipedia's definition of the term) writer who was heavily involved in creation of the article and has resurrected it after previous deletions. Users and IP's editing this article have also inserted links to this entry into other entries (such as Notable People from Quezon). Also appears that several users and IPs are socks for the author, which is the subject of the entry. <big>[[User:Noraft|<font color="green">ɳorɑfʈ</font>]]</big><small><sup>[[User talk:Noraft| Talk!]]</sup></small> 02:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
+Non-notable (according to Wikipedia's definition of the term) writer who was heavily involved in creation of the article and has resurrected it after previous deletions. Users and IP's editing this article have also inserted links to this entry into other entries (such as Notable People from Quezon). Also appears that several users and IPs are socks for the author, which is the subject of the entry. <big>[[User:Noraft|<span style="color:green;">ɳorɑfʈ</span>]]</big><small><sup>[[User talk:Noraft| Talk!]]</sup></small> 02:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' on the merits. The sources indicated either don't refer to the subject at all or confirm facts about the subject - he is a blogger, for example - but none of them actually offer the kind of coverage we require to show notability. There are no sources offered, nor can I find any, that actually talk about the subject himself. This may be a case where the [[WP:USUAL|Usual Caveats]] apply, as the subject seems to be early in his career; if he publishes notable work, or if he finds himself covered in reliable sources as required by [[WP:GNG]], then an article may become appropriate. But not yet. [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Said]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Did]] </small> 13:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Philippines|list of Philippines-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)</small>
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Delete''' The references given are either not independent, or not significant reliable sources, or do not actually mention the subject. While you are at it I would recommend you also nominate for deletion the article about his blog, [[Pinoy Gossip Boy]], for the same reasons. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 23:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>