Wikipedia:Peer review/History of Pune/archive1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:08, 1 July 2022

History of Pune

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because that can help to take the article to GA level. Thanks, Jonathansammy (talk) 15:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On a quick look, some rather over-long paras, and seems to use American rather than Indian English ("center", watercolor", "theater"). Perhaps too weighted to the modern period. The lead is too short. But at or near FA level, & certainly should bwe ok for GA. Johnbod (talk) 14:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will work on fixing the issues you have raised. Best regards. Jonathansammy (talk) 14:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taking a quick look, I see:

"generic name" errors in the References for 3 Gautam, 38 Kadekar, 89 Kosambi, 117 Alison, 122 Mills, 125 Jackson, 126 Mills, 127 an-Naim, 149 Marinos, and 179 Rao.
Numerous duplicate links, such as Tughlags, Baiaji Vishwanath, Madhavrao I, Parvati hill, Ganesh, The Peshwa rulers, Peshwe park, and 10 or 20 more. Remember that the Intro and image captions do not count, but everywhere else does. TwoScars (talk) 18:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have removed most of the duplicate links, and will work on the generica name errors. Jonathansammy (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 <noinclude>[[Category:March 2022 peer reviews]]</noinclude>
 <!-- Please add all peer review discussions below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 or 3 headers (==...== and ===...===) below to break up the review. Use level 4 (====...====) and so on.-->
-{{Peer review page|topic=history}}
+{{Closed peer review page}}
 I've listed this article for peer review because that  can  help  to take the article  to GA level.
 Thanks, [[User:Jonathansammy|Jonathansammy]] ([[User talk:Jonathansammy|talk]]) 15:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 :On a quick look, some rather over-long paras, and seems to use American rather than [[Indian English]] ("center", watercolor", "theater"). Perhaps too weighted to the modern period. The lead is too short. But at or near FA level, & certainly should bwe ok for GA. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 14:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 ::: Thanks. I will work on fixing the issues you have raised. Best regards. [[User:Jonathansammy|Jonathansammy]] ([[User talk:Jonathansammy|talk]]) 14:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
+:Taking a quick look, I see:
+* "generic name" errors in the References for 3 Gautam, 38 Kadekar, 89 Kosambi, 117 Alison, 122 Mills, 125 Jackson, 126 Mills, 127 an-Naim, 149 Marinos, and 179 Rao.
+* Numerous duplicate links, such as Tughlags, Baiaji Vishwanath, Madhavrao I, Parvati hill, Ganesh, The Peshwa rulers, Peshwe park, and 10 or 20 more. Remember that the Intro and image captions do not count, but everywhere else does. [[User:TwoScars|TwoScars]] ([[User talk:TwoScars|talk]]) 18:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
+::Thanks, I have removed most of the duplicate links, and will work on the generica name errors. [[User:Jonathansammy|Jonathansammy]] ([[User talk:Jonathansammy|talk]]) 14:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)