Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant Creepy Crawlies: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Giant Creepy Crawlies: Closed as soft delete (XFDcloser)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Giant Creepy Crawlies]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''soft delete'''. Based on [[WP:NOQUORUM|minimal participation]], this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired [[WP:PROD|PROD]] (a.k.a. [[WP:SOFTDELETE|"soft deletion"]]). Editors can <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Giant Creepy Crawlies}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant Creepy Crawlies}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Giant Creepy Crawlies}}&section=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]</span>. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 06:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
===[[:Giant Creepy Crawlies]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Giant Creepy Crawlies}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant Creepy Crawlies|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 17#{{anchorencode:Giant Creepy Crawlies}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1097437997/cur|edits since nomination]])
:{{la|1=Giant Creepy Crawlies}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant Creepy Crawlies|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 17#{{anchorencode:Giant Creepy Crawlies}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1097437997/cur|edits since nomination]])
Line 7: Line 12:
Article about a documentary television film, not [[WP:RS|reliably sourced]] as passing either [[WP:NFILM]] or [[WP:TVSHOW]]. As always, films don't get an automatic notability freebie just because they exist, and must show some properly sourced evidence of significance (notable film or television awards, critical analysis, etc.) -- but the only claim of notability on offer here is that it existed, the only "source" is its IMDb entry, and the article has been flagged for lacking sourcing since 2008 without ever having any new sourcing added to bolster notability. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 19:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Article about a documentary television film, not [[WP:RS|reliably sourced]] as passing either [[WP:NFILM]] or [[WP:TVSHOW]]. As always, films don't get an automatic notability freebie just because they exist, and must show some properly sourced evidence of significance (notable film or television awards, critical analysis, etc.) -- but the only claim of notability on offer here is that it existed, the only "source" is its IMDb entry, and the article has been flagged for lacking sourcing since 2008 without ever having any new sourcing added to bolster notability. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 19:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|Film]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television|Television]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|United Kingdom]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 19:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|Film]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television|Television]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|United Kingdom]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 19:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)</small>
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 17:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Giant Creepy Crawlies]]</noinclude></p>
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 17:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
*'''Delete''' No sources found. Only hits on spiders in general. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 01:59, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' No sources found. Only hits on spiders in general. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 01:59, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 06:19, 20 July 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Giant Creepy Crawlies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a documentary television film, not reliably sourced as passing either WP:NFILM or WP:TVSHOW. As always, films don't get an automatic notability freebie just because they exist, and must show some properly sourced evidence of significance (notable film or television awards, critical analysis, etc.) -- but the only claim of notability on offer here is that it existed, the only "source" is its IMDb entry, and the article has been flagged for lacking sourcing since 2008 without ever having any new sourcing added to bolster notability. Bearcat (talk) 19:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.