User:Ched/Arbcom

My page to deal with all things Arbcom:

IMO thoughts

very rough draft here, but some passing thoughts.

• There should be a minimum effort at DR prior to filing a case (outside emergency actions). Be it 3 or 4 or whatever number should be decided upon, there should be some community review at some DR board. (AN, AN/I, etc.)
• I think that once a case has been accepted, then anyone wishing to offer evidence should be added to the case, and their own actions should be open to review
• Arbs and former arbs should not be contributing evidence unless the case involves them directly, and they should be added to the case party list if they do
• Absolutely NO arb (past or present) should be stating "I think editorx should be sanctioned" outside the active arbs in the PD vote.
• I think some sort of appeal process should be instituted. Especially when new evidence/facts/circumstances come to light post PD.
• NO arb should incite, encourage, or even hint at another editor filing a case; either on-wiki, or especially off-wiki. If an Arb feels a case should be filed, then they should have the integrity to file it themselves and stand as a party to the case. Anything less is unbecoming.

Rough drafts

• to review for formatting, content, and flow of posts.

WP:ARBREX references

• AC/N
• AC talk
• AC talk
• VP

WP:AP3

Prep for WP:AP3

• ANI: JzG Incivility
• WP/AE: WP:AE JzG
• ANI: Snark and Bite
• RfD LABLEAKLIKELY
• Lab Leak MfD
• WP:RS CNN
• CNN again
• Israel
• Lab Leak at RSN see following sections as well.
• JzG talk See continuing bickering w/Beyond my Ken and Specifico at end.
• ANI - BMK Note culling and eliminating (2)

Sigs

• AN/I
• wp:sig - multiple threads
• VP