User:Ched/Arbcom: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→My Scorecard: ce |
m →[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RexxS|WP:ARBREX]] references: Unused ARB redirect which embodies no reusable principle, replaced: WP:ARBREX → WP:ARBREX |
||
| (57 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My page to deal with all things Arbcom: |
My page to deal with all things Arbcom: |
||
== |
== IMO thoughts == |
||
very rough draft here, but some passing thoughts. |
|||
* There should be a minimum effort at DR prior to filing a case (outside emergency actions). Be it 3 or 4 or whatever number should be decided upon, there should be some community review at some DR board. (AN, AN/I, etc.) |
|||
* I think that once a case has been accepted, then anyone wishing to offer evidence should be added to the case, and their own actions should be open to review |
|||
* Arbs and former arbs should ''not'' be contributing evidence '''unless''' the case involves them directly, and they should be added to the case party list if they do |
|||
* Absolutely NO arb (past or present) should be stating "I think editorx should be sanctioned" outside the active arbs in the PD vote. |
|||
* I think some sort of appeal process should be instituted. '''Especially''' when new evidence/facts/circumstances come to light post PD. |
|||
* NO arb should incite, encourage, or even hint at ''another'' editor filing a case; either on-wiki, or especially off-wiki. If an Arb feels a case should be filed, then they should have the integrity to file it themselves and stand as a party to the case. Anything less is unbecoming. |
|||
== Rough drafts == |
|||
* to review for formatting, content, and flow of posts. |
|||
* [[WP:FRAM]] |
|||
* Eric Corbett Ban |
|||
* Ritchie IBAN |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RexxS|WP:ARBREX]] references == |
|||
=== My Scorecard === |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Iridescent&oldid=1016272970#Curious_for_your_take AC/N] |
|||
==== ACE 2019 ==== |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=1016213653 AC talk] |
|||
Candidates for 2020 term |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee&oldid=1015600269 AC talk] |
|||
*01 Thryduulf - Have disagreed in past but I believe him to be compassionate, intelligent and also have the best interests in the project at heart. likely full support. |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)&oldid=1016264155#Question_to_the_community:_Should_Arbcom_members_be_restricted_from_discussing_active_cases_and_participants_on_forums_outside_Wikipedia? VP] |
|||
*02 Casliber - Absolute support, no questions asked. |
|||
*03 Newyorkbrad - Absolute support, no questions asked. |
|||
*04 Lord Roem - considered them a hat collector in the past .. will think on it though as they should be aware of what's entailed. |
|||
*05 Fish and karate - need to research - but likely support if they stay in |
|||
*06 Laser brain - Pretty sure this will get my full support |
|||
*07 Richwales - Will have to look into this |
|||
*08 Bradv - doubtful |
|||
*09 Gadfium - very likely support |
|||
*10 Worm That Turned - Absolute support, no questions asked. |
|||
*11 Barkeep49 - may be the best "new blood" I could think of - likely support. |
|||
*12 Xeno - strong support |
|||
*13 KrakatoaKatie - statement comes across as condescending and lecturing - will have to research. |
|||
*14 Beeblebrox - likely support (questionable actions recently) |
|||
*15 Llywrch - strong support |
|||
*16 David Fuchs - very likely support |
|||
*17 Maxim - likely strong support |
|||
*18 Kudpung - I'll have to think on this. I like Kudpung a LOT, but some disagreements with GW crossed the line IMO. |
|||
== WP:AP3 == |
|||
non-admin: |
|||
; Prep for [[WP:AP3]] |
|||
*19 Hawkeye7 - Need to think on this - getting deadmined is a lot to overcome |
|||
* ANI: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1067#Incivility_By_Admin_User:JzG JzG Incivility] |
|||
*20 The Rambling Man - Need to think on this - getting deadmined is a lot to overcome |
|||
* WP/AE: [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1024626981#JzG WP:AE JzG] |
|||
*21 Isarra - appears to be a joke nom: note: This is ''NOT'' [[User:Isaacl]] (who I likely would support) |
|||
* ANI: [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=1024612016#User:Terjen Snark and Bite] |
|||
*22 Calidum - Will have to look into this |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_May_7#Wikipedia:LABLEAKLIKELY RfD LABLEAKLIKELY] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adoring nanny/Essays/Lab Leak Likely|Lab Leak MfD]] |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&oldid=1024637846#CNN WP:RS CNN] |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&oldid=1024637846#CNN_-_Video_piece_from_Brian_Stelter CNN again] |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&oldid=1024897131#Falk_&_Tilley_(ECSWA),_Israel_Practices_towards_the_Palestinian_People_and_the_Question_of_Apartheid Israel] |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&oldid=1025304988#Lab_Leak_Again Lab Leak at RSN] see following sections as well. |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JzG&oldid=1025922614#Note JzG talk] See continuing bickering w/Beyond my Ken and Specifico at end. |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=1026142297#User:Beyond_My_Ken ANI - BMK] Note culling and eliminating (2) |
|||
== Sigs == |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=1025526093#User:DeNoel's_sig AN/I] |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Signatures&oldid=1025504217#Signatures_and_usernames wp:sig - multiple threads] |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)&oldid=1025526042#Simplify_your_signature VP] |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:44, 3 August 2022
My page to deal with all things Arbcom:
IMO thoughts
very rough draft here, but some passing thoughts.
- There should be a minimum effort at DR prior to filing a case (outside emergency actions). Be it 3 or 4 or whatever number should be decided upon, there should be some community review at some DR board. (AN, AN/I, etc.)
- I think that once a case has been accepted, then anyone wishing to offer evidence should be added to the case, and their own actions should be open to review
- Arbs and former arbs should not be contributing evidence unless the case involves them directly, and they should be added to the case party list if they do
- Absolutely NO arb (past or present) should be stating "I think editorx should be sanctioned" outside the active arbs in the PD vote.
- I think some sort of appeal process should be instituted. Especially when new evidence/facts/circumstances come to light post PD.
- NO arb should incite, encourage, or even hint at another editor filing a case; either on-wiki, or especially off-wiki. If an Arb feels a case should be filed, then they should have the integrity to file it themselves and stand as a party to the case. Anything less is unbecoming.
Rough drafts
- to review for formatting, content, and flow of posts.
WP:ARBREX references
WP:AP3
- Prep for WP:AP3
- ANI: JzG Incivility
- WP/AE: WP:AE JzG
- ANI: Snark and Bite
- RfD LABLEAKLIKELY
- Lab Leak MfD
- WP:RS CNN
- CNN again
- Israel
- Lab Leak at RSN see following sections as well.
- JzG talk See continuing bickering w/Beyond my Ken and Specifico at end.
- ANI - BMK Note culling and eliminating (2)