User talk:200.215.40.3: Difference between revisions
→Edit Summaries: new section |
Archived Warnings |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Old IP warnings top}} |
|||
Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome]] to wikipedia. I don't know why you undid my edit on [[Cardinal (Catholicism)]], but if you could redo it, it would be appreciated. It fixed a section header that had an extra '='. As for the "East-West" schism, it is certainly called by the name "Great Schism" and should be so identified. If it is also known as the "Great Schism of the East", then that can be mentioned too. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 00:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC) |
Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome]] to wikipedia. I don't know why you undid my edit on [[Cardinal (Catholicism)]], but if you could redo it, it would be appreciated. It fixed a section header that had an extra '='. As for the "East-West" schism, it is certainly called by the name "Great Schism" and should be so identified. If it is also known as the "Great Schism of the East", then that can be mentioned too. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 00:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
Please DO NOT edit too many articles without putting in a reason in your edit summary. |
Please DO NOT edit too many articles without putting in a reason in your edit summary. |
||
Also, reasons like |
Also, reasons like [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Pontiff&diff=178427161&oldid=178320120 this] are not valid — it is against Wikipedia policy to directly insult somebody (AKA adhomimem criticism). I could do without that. |
||
Hopefully you'll do better next time. [[User:Troy 07|~ Troy]] ([[User talk:Troy 07|talk]]) 05:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC) |
Hopefully you'll do better next time. [[User:Troy 07|~ Troy]] ([[User talk:Troy 07|talk]]) 05:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Please STOP Personal Attacks == |
|||
I must let you know that edit summeries such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Pontiff&diff=179195362&oldid=179110114 this one] WILL NOT be tolerated. It must stop immediatly. |
|||
Please, for the last time, consider the views of others. |
|||
Do NOT blatantly refer to Copts as "heretics". |
|||
I would not say that about Catholics. |
|||
* [[User:Troy 07|~ Troy]] ([[User talk:Troy 07|talk]]) 19:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== December 2007 == |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] }}}This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits.<br/> If you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> ''Your edit summaries are becoming abusive, and pushing a single religious point of view is not helpful.'' [[User:Jmlk17|<span style="color:#008000">Jmlk</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Jmlk17|<span style="color:#000080">1</span>]][[User_talk:Jmlk17|<span style="color:#800000">7</span>]] 01:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' |
|||
== Blocked == |
|||
You have been blocked for 48 hours for harassment of another user. Just because you disagree with another's religious views do '''''not''''' give you the right to demean or put them or their religion down. Please use these 2 days to think on the issue, and then come back and talk to the user(s) and reach a common medium. It's '''much''' easier to work around here when agreements and consensus are reached. [[User:Jmlk17|<span style="color:#008000">Jmlk</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Jmlk17|<span style="color:#000080">1</span>]][[User_talk:Jmlk17|<span style="color:#800000">7</span>]] 05:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Hi == |
|||
hi <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Thatphatguy|Thatphatguy]] ([[User talk:Thatphatguy#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Thatphatguy|contribs]]) 13:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Latest revision as of 01:03, 9 August 2022
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks. |
---|
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
Hello, and welcome to wikipedia. I don't know why you undid my edit on Cardinal (Catholicism), but if you could redo it, it would be appreciated. It fixed a section header that had an extra '='. As for the "East-West" schism, it is certainly called by the name "Great Schism" and should be so identified. If it is also known as the "Great Schism of the East", then that can be mentioned too. Gimmetrow 00:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RCC vs CC[edit]I noticed that you seem to be editing wikipedia for the sole purpose of changing RCC to CC. This is not necessary and considered disruptive. Please see Wikipedia:Naming_conventions#Controversial_names. Both RCC and CC are acceptable, but what isn't acceptable is changing between the two without any prior discussion/consensus. Please stop removing the word "Roman" from these articles and consider more productive ways to contribute to wikipedia. If you have any questions, I'd be glad to try and address them. Thanks.-Andrew c [talk] 02:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Edit Summaries[edit]Hello. I have noticed your contributions (I sincerely hope they're not bad intentions). I would like to inform you about something, however. Please DO NOT edit too many articles without putting in a reason in your edit summary. Also, reasons like this are not valid — it is against Wikipedia policy to directly insult somebody (AKA adhomimem criticism). I could do without that. Hopefully you'll do better next time. ~ Troy (talk) 05:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Please STOP Personal Attacks[edit]I must let you know that edit summeries such as this one WILL NOT be tolerated. It must stop immediatly. Please, for the last time, consider the views of others. Do NOT blatantly refer to Copts as "heretics". I would not say that about Catholics. December 2007[edit] This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
Blocked[edit]You have been blocked for 48 hours for harassment of another user. Just because you disagree with another's religious views do not give you the right to demean or put them or their religion down. Please use these 2 days to think on the issue, and then come back and talk to the user(s) and reach a common medium. It's much easier to work around here when agreements and consensus are reached. Jmlk17 05:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC) Hi[edit]hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatphatguy (talk • contribs) 13:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |