Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 October 17: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 19:41, 6 September 2022

< October 16	October 18 >

Full reviews may be found in this page history. For a summary, see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Recently concluded (2006 October)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {| width = "100%"
 |-
-! width="50%" align="left"  | <font color="gray">&lt;</font> [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006 October 16|October 16]]
+! width="50%" align="left"  | <span style="color:gray;">&lt;</span> [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006 October 16|October 16]]
-! width="50%" align="right" | [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006 October 18|October 18]] <font color="gray">&gt;</font>
+! width="50%" align="right" | [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006 October 18|October 18]] <span style="color:gray;">&gt;</span>
 |}
 </div>
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 </noinclude>
 ===17 October 2006===
-==== Arjinderpal Sekhon ====
-Doctor Arjinderpal Sekhon's [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arjinderpal_Sekhon]] profile was deleted from this site by Luna Santin.  There is no particular reason for the deletion of Dr. Sekhon's page, and I therefore wrote the following posting to Luna:
-Luna,
-I saw that you deleted the article on Arjinderpal Sekhon[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arjinderpal_Sekhon]], who is the Democratic Congressional Candidate for District 02 in California.  I am unclear as to why you deleted his page.  There are many other candidates' biographies on this resourceful website, and I am confused as to how his was either offensive or merited deletion.  The Republican opponent has a page that you did not bother deleting.  Is this politically motivated?
-I ask that you please respond promptly or I will seek an answer from another review board.
-Thanks,
-X
-I ask that someone please review the reasoning for such deletion as I have an inclination that it is politically driven just 21 days before the election.  This website has been a new, popular source of information in our country, and I expect that constituents of California's District 2 will rely on its content.
-Thank you in advance for your help and cooperation!
-:The page was deleted under the [[WP:PROD|prod]] method because it did not satisfy the guidelines in [[WP:CAE]]. &mdash; [[User:Dark Shikari|<span style="background-color:#DDDDFF; font-weight:bold"><FONT COLOR="#0000FF">Da</FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000CC">rk</FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000099">Sh</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000066">ik</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000033">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">i</FONT>]] <font color="#000088"><sup>[[User_talk:Dark_Shikari|''talk'']]</sup>'''/'''<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dark_Shikari|''contribs'']]</sub></font></span> 17:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Restored'''. I have notified the original PROD nominator and they can decide whether to give it a full hearing at [[WP:AFD|articles for deletion]]. Nothing more to be done here. --[[User:Samuel Blanning|Sam Blanning]]<sup>[[User talk:Samuel Blanning|(talk)]]</sup> 17:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
-==== JAKAZiD ====
-I wish to have the [[JAKAZiD]] article Restored/Undeleted, I feel it was unfairly deleted, it contained factual data about the Arist and was not Spam. [[User:ShadowmanX|ShadowmanX]] 15:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
-*For benefit of other reviewers, article was speedy deleted by [[User:Blnguyen]] with the summary ''"self web-recorded musician"''. '''Endorse deletion''' unless notability per [[WP:MUSIC]] is asserted and verified. This is about the creator of the Internet [[Cillit Bang]] and [[Esure]] videos, which are funny and arguably merit a mention in those articles (which they've got), but absent third-party coverage they and their creator do not merit articles themselves. However I would encourage administrators to at least link and refer to [[WP:CSD]] when speedy deleting articles for the benefit of users like ShadowmanX. Even cryptic shorthand like ''"[[WP:CSD|CSD]] A7"'' is better than something that really just looks like the administrator's opinion. --[[User:Samuel Blanning|Sam Blanning]]<sup>[[User talk:Samuel Blanning|(talk)]]</sup> 17:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Overturn and list at AfD'''.  It's a contested speedy, 'nuff said.  Even if it wasn't enough, [http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:4csTry2ZoYQJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JAKAZiD+JAKAZiD+wiki&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1 the cached version] indicates assertions of notability, such as the television commercials.  Clearly not an A7. --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 17:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
-====Lostpedia====
-Request for the deletion of [[Lostpedia]] to be reviewed. I appreciate the article was previously deleted but on this occassion was removed without any kind of discussion. I personally had added the <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> template, yet the article was still swiftly removed despite my requests for review first. Please could the article be restored, if only to allow actual free debate --[[User:Nickb123 3rd|Nickb123 3rd]] 17:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
-*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lostpedia|AfD]]. <b>[[User:Whispering|Whisp]]</b>[[User:Whispering/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]<b>[[User talk:Whispering|ring]]</b> 20:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Comment''' {hangon}} has pretty much no value on reposting deleted content. Those must come here first. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan-1967]] 20:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)