Jump to content

Operational manoeuvre group: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Soviet tank corps}}
The '''Operational manoeuvre group(OMG)''' fas a [[Red Army]] formation created in the period in which the [[deep operations]] theories were conceived.
{{refimprove|date=January 2013}}{{Use British English|date=April 2021}}
The '''operational manoeuvre group''' ('''OMG''') was a [[Soviet Army]] organisational [[maneuver warfare|manoeuvre warfare]] concept created during the early 1950s to replace the [[cavalry mechanized group]] which performed the [[deep operations]] on the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Eastern Front]] during the [[Second World War]].


This concept was later influenced by [[Blitzkrieg ]] theories and echelon-based doctrine.
The deep operations theory developed in cooperation between the [[Red Army]] and [[Wehrmacht]] theorists in the 1930s later influenced the [[Blitzkrieg]] operations and echelon-based doctrine.


Operational manoeuvre groups were inserted in the Red Army doctrine for a potential war against [[NATO]] in Europe;in fact,in the Soviet scheme,Shock or assault units,heavily supported by artillery,helicopters and CAS aircraft would have broken NATO front,then the operational manoeuvre groups would have exploited the breakthorugh and cleared the patch for [[tank army|tank armies]].
In the Soviet Army doctrine the Operational Manoeuvre Groups would be inserted to exploit a breakthrough by a [[Front (Soviet Army)|Front]] during a potential war against [[NATO]] in Europe. In the Soviet doctrine, after the [[Motorized infantry|motor-rifle units]], heavily supported by artillery, helicopters and [[close air support]] aircraft would have broken NATO front, the operational manoeuvre groups would be inserted to exploit the breakthrough using elements of, or whole [[Field army|tank armies]].<ref>Simpkin pp.139–186</ref>


An operational manoeuvre group was normally made up of 2 tank divisions and 3 to 5 infantry divisions.
At the Front level an Operational Manoeuvre Group could include two [[tank division]]s and three to five motor-rifle divisions.


==Notes==
In order to counter OMG's threat,NATO chreated a lot of [[special forces]] units with the task of saboting and attacking the logistical deposits (in particular fuel ones) so that the OMG advance would halt and permit NATO unis to counterattack and hevitate a rapid collapse of the European front.
{{reflist}}

==References==
* [[Richard Simpkin|Simpkin, Richard E]]. <cite>Race to the Swift: Thoughts on Twenty-First Century Warfare</cite>. Brassey's, 2000.

{{Russia-mil-stub}}
[[Category:Military doctrines]]
[[Category:Soviet Army]]

Latest revision as of 19:24, 20 September 2022

The operational manoeuvre group (OMG) was a Soviet Army organisational manoeuvre warfare concept created during the early 1950s to replace the cavalry mechanized group which performed the deep operations on the Eastern Front during the Second World War.

The deep operations theory developed in cooperation between the Red Army and Wehrmacht theorists in the 1930s later influenced the Blitzkrieg operations and echelon-based doctrine.

In the Soviet Army doctrine the Operational Manoeuvre Groups would be inserted to exploit a breakthrough by a Front during a potential war against NATO in Europe. In the Soviet doctrine, after the motor-rifle units, heavily supported by artillery, helicopters and close air support aircraft would have broken NATO front, the operational manoeuvre groups would be inserted to exploit the breakthrough using elements of, or whole tank armies.[1]

At the Front level an Operational Manoeuvre Group could include two tank divisions and three to five motor-rifle divisions.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Simpkin pp.139–186

References

[edit]
  • Simpkin, Richard E. Race to the Swift: Thoughts on Twenty-First Century Warfare. Brassey's, 2000.