User talk:DarwinGalileiHerschelHuygens: Difference between revisions
welcome and comment |
m Reverted edits by General Ization (talk) to last version by Akevsharma |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Procedures == |
== Procedures == |
||
Thanks for your edits which have interesting information. However, it would be a good idea to slow down because edit warring is very unproductive, see [[WP:EW]]. A new user edit warring is often regarded as a only being interested in pushing a particular point of view, and that can lead to blocks. Questions can be asked at [[WP:Teahouse]] or try my talk page. The place to discuss whether a particular edit should occur in on the article talk page ([[Talk:Lewis Carroll]]), not the talk page of an editor. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 21:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC) |
Thanks for your edits which have interesting information. However, it would be a good idea to slow down because edit warring is very unproductive, see [[WP:EW]]. A new user edit warring is often regarded as a only being interested in pushing a particular point of view, and that can lead to blocks. Questions can be asked at [[WP:Teahouse]] or try my talk page. The place to discuss whether a particular edit should occur in on the article talk page ([[Talk:Lewis Carroll]]), not the talk page of an editor. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 21:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
: Was coming here to make the same point as Johnuniq: when someone reverts your edit on Wikipedia, you should proceed to [[Talk:Lewis Carroll|the article's talk page]] to discuss and come to consensus. --[[User:Joel B. Lewis|JBL]] ([[User_talk:Joel_B._Lewis|talk]]) 21:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
: I have opened the discussion; you can find it [[Talk:Lewis_Carroll#Something_about_photos|here]]. --[[User:Joel B. Lewis|JBL]] ([[User_talk:Joel_B._Lewis|talk]]) 22:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== November 2021 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Drmies|Drmies]]. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, [[:German Expressionism (cinema)]], but you didn't provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|include a citation]] and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at [[Help:Referencing for beginners|referencing for beginners]]. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:Drmies|my talk page]]. ''That three-minute video by someone who appears to be a well-intentioned hobbyist is not a reliable source.'' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Erin Saoirse Adair|Erin Saoirse Adair]] (July 31) == |
|||
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Akevsharma was: |
|||
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|''reliable'']], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|''secondary'']] sources that are ''[[Wikipedia:Identifying and using independent sources|independent]]'' of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines on the notability of people]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!-- |
|||
-- |
|||
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''. |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Erin Saoirse Adair]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. |
|||
* If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned Drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]]. |
|||
* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Erin_Saoirse_Adair '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, on the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Akevsharma&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Erin_Saoirse_Adair '''reviewer's talk page''']</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors]]. |
|||
[[User:Akevsharma|Akevsharma]] ([[User talk:Akevsharma|talk]]) 08:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline--> |
|||
{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
|||
|- style="vertical-align: top;" |
|||
| [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo]] |
|||
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''DarwinGalileiHerschelHuygens'''! |
|||
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Articles for creation help desk]]'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''[[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]]''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! [[User:Akevsharma|Akevsharma]] ([[User talk:Akevsharma|talk]]) 08:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)</div> |
|||
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation --> |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]] |
Latest revision as of 04:43, 22 September 2022
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, DarwinGalileiHerschelHuygens, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Johnuniq (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Procedures
[edit]Thanks for your edits which have interesting information. However, it would be a good idea to slow down because edit warring is very unproductive, see WP:EW. A new user edit warring is often regarded as a only being interested in pushing a particular point of view, and that can lead to blocks. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse or try my talk page. The place to discuss whether a particular edit should occur in on the article talk page (Talk:Lewis Carroll), not the talk page of an editor. Johnuniq (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Was coming here to make the same point as Johnuniq: when someone reverts your edit on Wikipedia, you should proceed to the article's talk page to discuss and come to consensus. --JBL (talk) 21:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have opened the discussion; you can find it here. --JBL (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
November 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Drmies. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, German Expressionism (cinema), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. That three-minute video by someone who appears to be a well-intentioned hobbyist is not a reliable source. Drmies (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Erin Saoirse Adair (July 31)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erin Saoirse Adair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, DarwinGalileiHerschelHuygens!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 08:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
|