User talk:69.129.127.170: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Blanked IP talk}} |
|||
Dear User: |
|||
It is considered good Wikipedia etiquette to register as a user and use your user name when making edits, especially if you are a frequent editor. The Help page can direct you as to how to do this. |
|||
It is also considered good etiquette to discuss issues on the Talk page and sort them through there rather than simply revert or add tags previous to adequate discussion. |
|||
Incidentally, Rudolf Steiner warned against the rise of the swastika in Germany. Anthroposophy was officially termed a dangerous philosophy by the Nazi government, as it was 'inconsistent with Nazi racist ideas'. There is no connection between the movements whatsoever. [[User:Hgilbert|Hgilbert]] 01:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Unacceptable behaviour== |
|||
It is unacceptable for you to engage in personal attacks on other Wikipedians. For example in an edit summary on the Waldorf Education article today you told User:Hgilbert that " hgilbert: you are part of a cult that gave rise to the Nazi movement -- you should be ashamed of yourself!" Please read the Wikipedia rules on user behaviour. See [[Wikipedia:Etiquette]] . In particular , *Assume good faith, *Be polite, *Argue facts not personalities, *Be civil. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 07:09, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Note to Anonymous and Hgilbert == |
|||
I'm sending this to both of you. Please cease and dissist from inserting pro and anti POV of any kind into the pages related to anthroposophy. All "facts" must be verified from a '''reliable''' outside source. As it stand all these pages are in need of a major clean-up. These pages are indeed disputed, so the tags have to stay, but inserting unverified claims is also not acceptable. If you wish for something to be included, please aquire the neccasery verification first. Please check [[WP:RS]] for guidelines on what is and isn't acceptable. I also suggest recommeding the changes on the talk page first as well before implimenting it into the article. [[User:Jefffire|Jefffire]] 10:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I'm not very impressed with either of you two's behaviour. Please discuss changes on the talk pages and research some references. I'm sure you have a lot to contribute but please do it within Wikipedia guidelines rather than playing into the hands of the extremists. [[User:Jefffire|Jefffire]] 12:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Verifiability. == |
|||
Verifiability is THE cornerstone of Wikipedia. The policy is detailed here > [[WP:V]]. Read it before making any more edits. [[User:Jefffire|Jefffire]] 13:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 1 October 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.