Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rani Agrawal (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 05:49, 29 October 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Explicit,

The article had several credible links from local newspapers in India. The said movie in question was also listed on IMDB, Youtube. Can you please help me understand what would be required to re-instate this article?

Thanks. Lovelustlife (talk) 05:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rani Agrawal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~No WP:GNG, no WP:SIGCOV, Only one source film Love recipe that too not independent and definitely not reliable. Cinzia007 (talk) 12:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)~~ struck confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 11:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cinzia007 (talk) 12:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and India. Shellwood (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No WP:RELY are used here. Not fulfilling the WP:GNG policy. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on number of TV series and films, she would seem to qualify based on guidelines of WP:ENT. I also say this because several of teh TV series she has been in have Wiki pages, so they would seem to be notable TV series, hence it establishes notability. Jupiteralien (talk) 21:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not satisfying the WP:GNG policy. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of meeting NACTOR and lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG. Many Indian TV shows themselves rest on shaky notability, so merely having linked articles is not sufficient. Needs to be backed up by independent and reliable sources which is not the case here, nothing worthy was found in a BEFORE search. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 11:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
+:Hi Explicit,
+:The article had several credible links from local newspapers in India. The said movie in question was also listed on IMDB, Youtube. Can you please help me understand what would be required to re-instate this article?
+:Thanks. [[User:Lovelustlife|Lovelustlife]] ([[User talk:Lovelustlife|talk]]) 05:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 ===[[:Rani Agrawal]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 <div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article:
 {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rani Agrawal}}
@@ Line 14: / Line 25: @@
 *'''Keep''' based on number of TV series and films, she would seem to qualify based on guidelines of [[WP:ENT]]. I also say this because several of teh TV series she has been in have Wiki pages, so they would seem to be notable TV series, hence it establishes notability. [[User:Jupiteralien|Jupiteralien]] ([[User talk:Jupiteralien|talk]]) 21:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Not satisfying the [[WP:GNG]] policy. [[User:GorgeCustersSabre|George Custer&#39;s Sabre]] ([[User talk:GorgeCustersSabre|talk]]) 02:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 13:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Rani Agrawal (2nd nomination)]]</noinclude></p>
+:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 13:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
-* '''Delete''': No evidence of meeting NACTOR and lacks [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] in reliable sources to meet GNG. Nothing worthy was found in a BEFORE search. --   [[User:Ab207|Ab207]] ([[User talk:Ab207|talk]]) 16:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC) <!--VCB Ab207-->
+* '''Delete''': No evidence of meeting NACTOR and lacks [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] in reliable sources to meet GNG. Many Indian TV shows themselves rest on shaky notability, so merely having linked articles is not sufficient. Needs to be backed up by independent and reliable sources which is not the case here, nothing worthy was found in a BEFORE search. --   [[User:Ab207|Ab207]] ([[User talk:Ab207|talk]]) 16:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC) <!--VCB Ab207-->
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>