User talk:Bh3u4m: Difference between revisions
FastilyBot (talk | contribs) BOT: Some of your contributions may require attention |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Speedy deletion of [[:O tempora o mores!]]== |
|||
== Battlecry needs some notability info == |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|48px|left]] Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as [[:O tempora o mores!]], to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] |
|||
| ⚫ | If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:O tempora o mores!|the page]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:O tempora o mores!|the article's talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:Macys123|Macy's]][[User talk:Macys123|123]] <sup>([[Wikipedia:Editor review/Macys123|review me]])</sup> 22:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> |
||
:I just contested it for you, and the page was saved. You can ignore the scolding Macys gave you in the first paragraph; you did everything fine. Thanks for helping improve Wikipedia! --[[User:Ye Olde Luke|Ye Olde Luke]] ([[User talk:Ye Olde Luke|talk]]) 23:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
A tag has been placed on [[:Battlecry (band)]], requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]]. |
|||
==Image copyright problem with Image:Camunic Alphabet.jpeg== |
|||
| ⚫ | If you think that |
||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|32px|left|Image Copyright problem]] |
|||
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn --> [[User:BenB4|BenB4]] 15:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Thank you for uploading [[:Image:Camunic Alphabet.jpeg]]. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|copyright tag]]''' to the [[Help:Image page|image description page]]. |
|||
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. [[User:STBotI|STBotI]] ([[User talk:STBotI|talk]]) 20:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Your edits in Openstreetmap == |
|||
Hi bh3u4m, I am not completely sure that you are the same person but it sounds like. I wanted to let you know that openstreetmap changes its license and you have not yet reacted. Please go to http://openstreetmap.org/user/terms and click yes or no. If you do not click on any this means that you don't give consent (it is counted as a no and all of your data and the data that is based on your work will be deleted from the active database by 1st of April 2012). More information about the license change (in several languages) can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ODbL/We_Are_Changing_The_License |
|||
Thank you, dieterdreist from Openstreetmap.org --[[Special:Contributions/79.53.13.191|79.53.13.191]] ([[User talk:79.53.13.191|talk]]) 00:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Comparison of database access]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:Comparison of database access]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
<blockquote>'''Highly-confusing [[WP:NOTGUIDE|how-to guide]] that amounts to a random mishmash of two unrelated things. And that's after I removed a bunch of fluff that wasn't comparing anything to anything at all.'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Comparison of database access|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> |
|||
'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the [[Help:Introduction to navigating Wikipedia/4|history]] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, [[User:FastilyBot|FastilyBot]] ([[User talk:FastilyBot|talk]]) 09:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:00, 29 October 2022
Speedy deletion of O tempora o mores!
[edit]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as O tempora o mores!, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Macy's123 (review me) 22:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I just contested it for you, and the page was saved. You can ignore the scolding Macys gave you in the first paragraph; you did everything fine. Thanks for helping improve Wikipedia! --Ye Olde Luke (talk) 23:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Camunic Alphabet.jpeg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Camunic Alphabet.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Your edits in Openstreetmap
[edit]Hi bh3u4m, I am not completely sure that you are the same person but it sounds like. I wanted to let you know that openstreetmap changes its license and you have not yet reacted. Please go to http://openstreetmap.org/user/terms and click yes or no. If you do not click on any this means that you don't give consent (it is counted as a no and all of your data and the data that is based on your work will be deleted from the active database by 1st of April 2012). More information about the license change (in several languages) can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ODbL/We_Are_Changing_The_License Thank you, dieterdreist from Openstreetmap.org --79.53.13.191 (talk) 00:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Comparison of database access has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Highly-confusing how-to guide that amounts to a random mishmash of two unrelated things. And that's after I removed a bunch of fluff that wasn't comparing anything to anything at all.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)