Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 5: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
(BOT) New discussion page: 2022 November 5. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/TFDClerk |
→Relegated French side templates: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
==== Relegated French side templates ==== |
|||
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).'' |
|||
The result of the discussion was '''delete'''<!-- Tfd top -->. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 23:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* {{Tfd links|Union Sportive Bressane squad}} |
|||
* {{Tfd links|RC Narbonne squad}} |
|||
Both Bourg-en-Bresse and Narbonne were relegated at the end of the 2021-22 season, and now play in non-notable leagues, so their current squad templates are no longer needed. [[User:Rugbyfan22|Rugbyfan22]] ([[User talk:Rugbyfan22|talk]]) 21:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' per nomination. --[[User:WikiCleanerMan|WikiCleanerMan]] ([[User talk:WikiCleanerMan|talk]]) 16:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div> |
|||
==== Dissolved rugby union current squad templates ==== |
|||
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).'' |
|||
The result of the discussion was '''delete'''<!-- Tfd top -->. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 23:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* {{Tfd links|LA Giltinis squad}} |
|||
* {{Tfd links|Austin Gilgronis squad}} |
|||
* {{Tfd links|Worcester Warriors squad}} |
|||
* {{Tfd links|Wasps squad}} |
|||
Current squad templates for teams that no longer compete in notable divisions (both American sides have folded, Worcester and Wasps will no longer be in notable divisions) so the templates are no longer needed. [[User:Rugbyfan22|Rugbyfan22]] ([[User talk:Rugbyfan22|talk]]) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' per nomination. --[[User:WikiCleanerMan|WikiCleanerMan]] ([[User talk:WikiCleanerMan|talk]]) 16:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' if either Worcester or Wasps come back in the Championship the templates can be recreated quite easily. Similarly the MLR squads if new teams emerge as successors.[[User:Skeene88|Skeene88]] ([[User talk:Skeene88|talk]]) 14:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div> |
|||
==== [[Template:Aashish Jung (आशिष जंग)]] ==== |
|||
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).'' |
|||
The result of the discussion was '''speedy delete'''<!-- Tfd top -->. [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 14:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* {{Tfd links|Aashish Jung (आशिष जंग)}} |
|||
appears to be an attempt to create an article in template space. [[Draft:Aashish Jung]] already exists. [[user:lettherebedarklight|lettherebedarklight]]〔[[user talk:lettherebedarklight|晚安]] [[special:contribs/lettherebedarklight|おやすみ]]〕[[template:ping|ping me when replying]] 06:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Speedy delete''' via [[WP:G6]]. Created in wrong namespace, and potential move target already exists in a similar form. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 06:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*(found this via [[WP:TH#Creating Article Page]]): '''delete, potentially speedy''':Draft article created in the wrong namespace, and from what I can see [[Draft:Aashish Jung]] doesn't realy contain anything less apart from the fact that the books in the "Bibliography" section are not linked and that the hints for the see also section from [[Template:Biography]] where removed. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 07:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:48, 12 November 2022
Relegated French side templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Union Sportive Bressane squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:RC Narbonne squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Both Bourg-en-Bresse and Narbonne were relegated at the end of the 2021-22 season, and now play in non-notable leagues, so their current squad templates are no longer needed. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Dissolved rugby union current squad templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Template:LA Giltinis squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Austin Gilgronis squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Worcester Warriors squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wasps squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Current squad templates for teams that no longer compete in notable divisions (both American sides have folded, Worcester and Wasps will no longer be in notable divisions) so the templates are no longer needed. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete if either Worcester or Wasps come back in the Championship the templates can be recreated quite easily. Similarly the MLR squads if new teams emerge as successors.Skeene88 (talk) 14:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
appears to be an attempt to create an article in template space. Draft:Aashish Jung already exists. lettherebedarklight〔晚安 おやすみ〕ping me when replying 06:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete via WP:G6. Created in wrong namespace, and potential move target already exists in a similar form. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- (found this via WP:TH#Creating Article Page): delete, potentially speedy:Draft article created in the wrong namespace, and from what I can see Draft:Aashish Jung doesn't realy contain anything less apart from the fact that the books in the "Bibliography" section are not linked and that the hints for the see also section from Template:Biography where removed. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).