Jump to content

User talk:Compost: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification: proposed deletion of Die Chinesische Mauer.
Compost (talk | contribs)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 09:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 09:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

:This smacks of an overzealous Internet Janitor being a jobsworth. Just because there are no links to articles, it's ridiculous to try to delete a page full of valid information, most of which is copied from the CD booklet of the album in question. It's also a well documented musical album which you can see referenced across many other musical websites. Stupid decision in my opinion. It wastes the time of the original writers, and deprives the public of information which is found within the album's liner notes. [[User:Compost|Compost]] ([[User talk:Compost#top|talk]]) 14:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Legionäre]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Legionäre]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails [[WP:NALBUM]], lacks any reliable sources or references. Discogs is not an acceptable source.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Legionäre|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 09:46, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

:This smacks of an overzealous Internet Janitor being a jobsworth. Just because there are no links to articles, it's ridiculous to try to delete a page full of valid information, most of which is copied from the CD booklet of the album in question. It's also a well documented musical album which you can see referenced across many other musical websites. Stupid decision in my opinion. It wastes the time of the original writers, and deprives the public of information which is found within the album's liner notes. [[User:Compost|Compost]] ([[User talk:Compost#top|talk]]) 14:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:17, 17 November 2022

General Stuff

[edit]

Please add any questions, or information regarding my Wikipedia edits or additions here. Many thanks.

WikiProject Dad's Army Role call

[edit]

There is currently a role call going on for this project and if you wish to contiune to help out with this project please see the project talk page. --Mollsmolyneux 11:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

[edit]
Please accept this invite to join the Mariners WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Seattle Mariners. Simply click here to accept!
Notice

The article Die Chinesische Mauer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM, lacks any sources or references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This smacks of an overzealous Internet Janitor being a jobsworth. Just because there are no links to articles, it's ridiculous to try to delete a page full of valid information, most of which is copied from the CD booklet of the album in question. It's also a well documented musical album which you can see referenced across many other musical websites. Stupid decision in my opinion. It wastes the time of the original writers, and deprives the public of information which is found within the album's liner notes. Compost (talk) 14:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Legionäre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM, lacks any reliable sources or references. Discogs is not an acceptable source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:46, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This smacks of an overzealous Internet Janitor being a jobsworth. Just because there are no links to articles, it's ridiculous to try to delete a page full of valid information, most of which is copied from the CD booklet of the album in question. It's also a well documented musical album which you can see referenced across many other musical websites. Stupid decision in my opinion. It wastes the time of the original writers, and deprives the public of information which is found within the album's liner notes. Compost (talk) 14:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]