User talk:Ju66l3r: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tuzapicabit (talk | contribs) |
→ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message: new section Tag: |
||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*[[User talk:Ju66l3r/Archive 5|January 9, 2007 - May 11, 2007]] |
*[[User talk:Ju66l3r/Archive 5|January 9, 2007 - May 11, 2007]] |
||
*[[User talk:Ju66l3r/Archive 6|May 12, 2007 - May 12, 2008]] |
*[[User talk:Ju66l3r/Archive 6|May 12, 2007 - May 12, 2008]] |
||
*[[User talk:Ju66l3r/Archive 7|May 13, 2008 - January 4, 2011]] |
|||
*[[User talk:Ju66l3r/Archive 8|Jan 5, 2011 - December 3, 2017]] |
|||
|}<!--Template:Archivebox--> |
|}<!--Template:Archivebox--> |
||
__TOC__ |
__TOC__ |
||
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == |
|||
== Please notify authors of speedy deletion nominations == |
|||
Hello. Thank you for your efforts to nominate inappropriate articles for speedy deletion. |
|||
The general custom when nominating an article for speedy deletion is to notify the creator of the |
|||
article. The speedy deletion template actually includes boilerplate text you can use to notify the |
|||
article's creator, or packages such as [[WP:TW|Twinkle]] do that automatically for you. Not doing so |
|||
is somewhat discourteous and can cause feelings of bad will as in the case of |
|||
your tagging of [[Ball me blazer]]. That being said, your contributions are appreciated. Thank you. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 21:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
==Third opinion tag on Airbag== |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
I don't appreciate your removing the third opinion tag from the page. Next time please check with the person who put it there (me) to make sure the issue is resolved. Courtesy. --[[User:The Founders Intent|<font color="green">'''''T<small>HE</small> F<small>OUNDERS</small> I<small>NTENT </small>'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The Founders Intent|''TALK'']]</sup> 00:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
== Re:Deleted article == |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> |
|||
That's absolutely fine, no worries. I've deleted it again. Thanks for letting me know. Happy editing! :-) <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans-serif">[[User:Lradrama|<span style="color:red">Lra</span>]][[User talk:Lradrama|drama]]</span> 08:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
</div> |
|||
==Deletion tag on my page== |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 --> |
|||
Hello, |
|||
Recenty you put a deletion tag on my artcile [[Reasoft pdf printer]]. However, I don't really think that any other artciles such as [[NovaPDF]] or [[PDFCreator]] can be considered NOTICEABLE. Just don't see the difference. Please explain me what's wrong with my artcile and how can I 'repair' it :) |
|||
--[[User:Vein eater|Vein eater]] ([[User talk:Vein eater|talk]]) 04:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Hi. I marked for article for deletion discussion because I do not feel it meets the [[WP:N|notability guidelines]], particularly the need for secondary sources and awards that make it worth noting. The purpose of the discussion is so that the community can discuss the article because I may be wrong to think it needs to be deleted. Please also see information on [[WP:PRODUCT|product notability]] where the company is more likely to be notable and not its component products unless the product is truly exceptional. I do not agree that those articles meet the criteria actually, but I saw your article first. I will probably put one or both of those other articles up for deletion discussion as well. [[User:Ju66l3r|ju66l3r]] ([[User talk:Ju66l3r#top|talk]]) 05:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Speedily deletion of my entry == |
|||
Hi there, |
|||
You recently put a speedily deletion tag on my entry on wheredo-i and I was wondering whether you could please let me know what is wrong with the entry and how I the entry should appear so this doesn't happen again. Also,how come I was not notified by e-mail that you put this tag on my entry? Looking forward to your reply. [[User:Jchatt|Jchatt]] ([[User talk:Jchatt|talk]]) 13:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)3rd June 2008 |
|||
:The entry did not comply with the [[WP:WEB|website notability guidelines]]. You could look at other website entries in Wikipedia to try and get a gauge for what websites fit the notability guidelines. Please keep in mind that just because another page exists, however, that alone does not mean it meets the guidelines either. It's possible it also needs to be deleted as well. As for being notified, I don't know if it's possible or not to be notified by e-mail when a warning/message has been put on [[User_talk:Jchatt|your talk page]], but when your page has been suggested for deletion, it is common courtesy for people to leave a message on your talk page. The next time you view a Wikipedia page while logged into your account after someone leaves you a message, you will get a notice at the top of that page to let you know you have a new message. I left you a message on your talk page about the speedy deletion, I'm sorry if you did not see it in time. [[User:Ju66l3r|ju66l3r]] ([[User talk:Ju66l3r#top|talk]]) 02:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Commis chef== |
|||
I just saw you added back a training period for a commis chef under the [[chef]] article. These years vary by establishment and are not universal which is why I originally removed that information. It could be reworded to be less finite if it relates to a specific culture like that of France or England but we would need a proper source, where are you sourcing this info. from?--[[User:Tanner-Christopher|Chef Tanner]] ([[User talk:Tanner-Christopher|talk]]) 21:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I was only copying that information from something someone added to a new article at [[Commis Chef]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Commis_Chef&oldid=218711883 revision prior to merge]). I felt that was excessive given the relative size of the Chef article and the lack of context to the new article. I merged the two articles together by simply copying the text into the Chef article and redirecting the other article. You'll have to ask [[User:Tuzapicabit|Tuzapicabit]] about any technical problems you have with the text. If it were me, I would just edit it as you feel is necessary by being [[WP:BOLD|bold]]. [[User:Ju66l3r|ju66l3r]] ([[User talk:Ju66l3r#top|talk]]) 05:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Yes, I saw what you did. I had only started the article and was about to continue expanding it with citations etc, since my previous entry had been removed from the main article on the grounds that it was too in-depth. <br />I'm happy to leave it where it is however. Not sure whether Commis Chef deserves its own page.<br /> As for the training procedure as mention above, this is not dictated by establishment, but by National Catering authorities within the industry- in the UK and Ireland at least (which is what I was basing it on) - European countries have a similar structure, although perhaps in a separate article, someone in the know could expand it wih the US training structure etc. <br />For the time being I'll leave it, but I would imagine given the many people interested in becoming chefs would be interested enough to read about it, so perhaps a page is warranted. (And for all the people that constantly ask me 'what's a ''commiss'' chef?')I'll leave in your (more experienced) hands.--[[User:Tuzapicabit|Tuzapicabit]] ([[User talk:Tuzapicabit|talk]]) 07:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 00:35, 29 November 2022
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics.
If you comment here, then I will respond here unless you ask otherwise. Thank you.
 Archives |
|---|
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)