Interior lines: Difference between revisions
wording |
m link |
||
(30 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Method of movement and operation in warfare}} |
|||
{{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}} |
|||
'''Interior lines'''{{efn|a term invented by 19th century Swiss-French officer and prominent author [[Antoine-Henri Jomini]]}} (as opposed to '''exterior lines''') is a [[Military terminology|military term]], derived from the generic term ''line of operation'' or ''line of movement''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-0.pdf |title= Operations, chapter 5 - Passage of lines | publisher= US Army | date=December 6, 2017 | author=Michael D. Lundy | accessdate= May 4, 2020 }}</ref> The term "interior lines" is commonly used to illustrate, describe, and analyze the various possible routes (lines) of logistics, supply, recon, approach, attack, evasion, maneuver, or retreat of armed forces. |
|||
Use of '''interior lines''' is a strategy of [[war]]fare based on the fact that lines of movement and communication within an enclosed area are shorter than those on the outside. As the area held by a defensive force shrinks, the advantages increase. |
|||
Interior line strategies are based on the fact that lines of movement and communication within an enclosed area are shorter and safer than those on the outside. As the area held by a defensive force shrinks, the interior line advantage held by the defensive force increases.<ref name="Morris1895">{{cite book|author=William O'Connor Morris|title=Moltke a biographical and critical study|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cb8GAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA85|year=1895|publisher=Рипол Классик|isbn=978-5-87074-092-8|pages=85–}}</ref><ref name="Burne1946">{{cite book|author=Alfred Higgins Burne|title=Strategy as Exemplified in the Second World War: A Strategical Examination of the Land Operations|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=axo9AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA17|year=1946|publisher=CUP Archive|pages=17–|id=GGKEY:7F20S7AZG5P}}</ref> |
|||
Skillful and comprehensive application of interior line tactics can, for a partially surrounded combat force, provide vital breathing space, greatly reduce time, effort, security, and secrecy of resupplies and redeployment, and decrease the number of casualties. These effects may have a great impact on morale and eventually prove decisive, as according to [[Napoleon Bonaparte]]: ''"in war morale forces are to physical three to one"''.<ref>{{cite book|title=A General Biographical Dictionary: Comprising a Summary Account of the Most Distinguished Persons of All Ages, Nations, and Professions, Including More Than One Thousand Articles of American Biography ...|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j1E4AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA1001|year=1845|publisher=A.V. Blake|pages=1001–}}</ref><ref name="Zabecki2006">{{cite book|author=David T. Zabecki|title=The German 1918 Offensives: A Case Study in The Operational Level of War|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4b9_AgAAQBAJ&pg=PP66|date=27 September 2006|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-134-25224-4|pages=66–}}</ref> |
|||
Using the strategy of interior lines, a partially surrounded or more centrally disposed force can more easily resupply and redeploy its units, and thus more easily mount a series of quick attacks at multiple locations. |
|||
==Tactic== |
==Tactic== |
||
⚫ | [[Image:Korea War Phase I.svg|thumb|left|250px|By September 1950, US and South Korean Forces had been forced back to form the Pusan Perimeter in the South-East of [[Korean Peninsula|the peninsula]], giving the defenders shorter interior lines. This created a concentration of forces in defense, [[Battle of Pusan Perimeter logistics|allowing quicker reinforcements and logistics]]. Fresh troops and supplies were increasingly being brought into the port in [[Busan|Pusan]], strengthening the defense even further and preventing a North Korean victory. By contrast, the North Korean supply line had lengthened, making offensive action harder to maintain.]] |
||
[[File:Interior Lines.jpg|thumb|Right|Abstract Depiction of the advantages of interior lines in the scenario of battle field tactics.]] |
|||
In the context of battlefield tactics, |
In the context of battlefield tactics, interior lines allow for more rapid concentration of resources (firepower and manpower) and afford greater tactical flexibility. Resources are ideally brought to bear at a point where the adversary is not able to quickly respond, because of their longer external lines. Examples include: |
||
* At the [[Battle of Dyrrhachium (48 BC)]], the numerically superior [[Optimates]], led by [[Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus]], defeated the more battle-hardened [[Populares]], led by [[Gaius Julius Caesar]], when Caesar attempted to encircle them. |
|||
* During the [[Battles of Lexington and Concord]], [[Brigadier General]] [[Hugh Percy, 2nd Duke of Northumberland|Hugh Percy]] utilized interior lines during the British retreat, as his men were often surrounded by [[Minutemen|militia]]. |
|||
* At the [[Battle of Jena-Auerstedt]], [[Louis Nicolas Davout]] employed interior lines to defeat the main [[Prussian army]]. |
|||
* At the [[Battle of Wagram]], the [[First French Empire|French]] under [[Napoleon I]] defeated the Austrians by using interior lines to achieve local numerical superiority. |
|||
* [[George Gordon Meade]] used interior lines against [[Robert E. Lee]] at the [[Battle of Gettysburg]] in 1863.<ref name="Esq.2011">{{cite book|author=Kent Masterson Brown, Esq.|title=Retreat from Gettysburg: Lee, Logistics, and the Pennsylvania Campaign|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1L9RtUE9LhwC&pg=PA44|date=1 August 2011|publisher=UNC Press Books|isbn=978-0-8078-6942-0|pages=44–}}</ref> |
|||
#[[Battle of Rorke's Drift]]. A vastly-outnumbered British force managed to defeat a Zulu army by using the advantages of the small area to defend. |
|||
⚫ | [[Image:Korea War Phase I.svg|thumb|left|250px|By September 1950, US and South Korean Forces had been forced back to form the Pusan Perimeter in the South-East of |
||
==Strategy== |
==Strategy== |
||
As a strategy, |
As a strategy, interior lines are commonly employed to cut armies off from reinforcements and supplies, or prevent allies from uniting their forces. Interior lines often allow for a numerically inferior force to gain a numerical superiority over an adversary in a given locality, which increases the chances of overpowering an enemy and defeating it in detail. In overpowering an enemy locally, an army hopes to demoralize the enemy sufficiently to bring it to political terms. |
||
Some examples include: |
|||
<big>Examples</big> |
|||
[[File:Montenotte Campaign 21 April 1796.JPG|300px|thumb|right|upright=2.2|alt=Montenotte Campaign, Battle of Mondovì, 21 April 1796|After the [[Battle of Mondovi]], the French gained the advantage of having the interior position over their adversaries in the [[First Coalition]].]] |
[[File:Montenotte Campaign 21 April 1796.JPG|300px|thumb|right|upright=2.2|alt=Montenotte Campaign, Battle of Mondovì, 21 April 1796|After the [[Battle of Mondovi]], the French gained the advantage of having the interior position over their adversaries in the [[First Coalition]].]] |
||
* At the [[Battle of Montenotte]], the [[First French Republic]] under [[Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon]] defeated the [[Habsburg monarchy|Austrians]] and destroyed an entire corps, thereby destroying the link between the Austrians and their allies, the [[Kingdom of Sardinia]]. As a result of the victory, the Sardinians were separated from Austria and were unable to defeat the French or rejoin the Austrians. They eventually sued for peace. |
|||
* [[Frederick II of Prussia|Frederick the Great's]] operational strategy, in his prosecution of the [[Seven Years' War]] against the separate armies of the French, the Russians and the Austrians, can be considered an example of the advantage of interior lines in warfare. |
|||
* Interior lines also gave the [[Red Army|Reds]] a distinct advantage over the [[White movement|Whites]] in the [[Russian Civil War]]. |
|||
* [[General (CSA)|General]] [[Robert E. Lee]] used interior lines during the [[Battle of Antietam]] during the [[American Civil War]] in 1862.<ref name="Dougherty2015">{{cite book|author=Kevin Dougherty|title=The Vicksburg Campaign: Strategy, Battles and Key Figures|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=64X2BgAAQBAJ&pg=PA107|date=6 March 2015|publisher=McFarland|isbn=978-1-4766-1993-4|pages=107–}}</ref> |
|||
* Though the [[Battle of Pusan Perimeter|Pusan Perimeter]] (Korea, 1950) was not an intentional strategy, the concentration of UN forces within the Perimeter allowed quick movement of supplies and reinforcements via interior lines. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* [[Military strategy]] |
* [[Military strategy]] |
||
* [[Two-front war]] |
* [[Two-front war]] |
||
* [[Encirclement]] |
|||
== Notes == |
|||
; Footnotes |
|||
{{Notelist}} |
|||
== References == |
|||
{{Reflist|2}} |
|||
[[Category:Military strategy]] |
[[Category:Military strategy]] |
Latest revision as of 20:41, 18 December 2022
Interior lines[a] (as opposed to exterior lines) is a military term, derived from the generic term line of operation or line of movement.[1] The term "interior lines" is commonly used to illustrate, describe, and analyze the various possible routes (lines) of logistics, supply, recon, approach, attack, evasion, maneuver, or retreat of armed forces. Interior line strategies are based on the fact that lines of movement and communication within an enclosed area are shorter and safer than those on the outside. As the area held by a defensive force shrinks, the interior line advantage held by the defensive force increases.[2][3]
Skillful and comprehensive application of interior line tactics can, for a partially surrounded combat force, provide vital breathing space, greatly reduce time, effort, security, and secrecy of resupplies and redeployment, and decrease the number of casualties. These effects may have a great impact on morale and eventually prove decisive, as according to Napoleon Bonaparte: "in war morale forces are to physical three to one".[4][5]
Tactic
[edit]In the context of battlefield tactics, interior lines allow for more rapid concentration of resources (firepower and manpower) and afford greater tactical flexibility. Resources are ideally brought to bear at a point where the adversary is not able to quickly respond, because of their longer external lines. Examples include:
- At the Battle of Dyrrhachium (48 BC), the numerically superior Optimates, led by Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, defeated the more battle-hardened Populares, led by Gaius Julius Caesar, when Caesar attempted to encircle them.
- During the Battles of Lexington and Concord, Brigadier General Hugh Percy utilized interior lines during the British retreat, as his men were often surrounded by militia.
- At the Battle of Jena-Auerstedt, Louis Nicolas Davout employed interior lines to defeat the main Prussian army.
- At the Battle of Wagram, the French under Napoleon I defeated the Austrians by using interior lines to achieve local numerical superiority.
- George Gordon Meade used interior lines against Robert E. Lee at the Battle of Gettysburg in 1863.[6]
Strategy
[edit]As a strategy, interior lines are commonly employed to cut armies off from reinforcements and supplies, or prevent allies from uniting their forces. Interior lines often allow for a numerically inferior force to gain a numerical superiority over an adversary in a given locality, which increases the chances of overpowering an enemy and defeating it in detail. In overpowering an enemy locally, an army hopes to demoralize the enemy sufficiently to bring it to political terms.
Some examples include:
- At the Battle of Montenotte, the First French Republic under Napoleon defeated the Austrians and destroyed an entire corps, thereby destroying the link between the Austrians and their allies, the Kingdom of Sardinia. As a result of the victory, the Sardinians were separated from Austria and were unable to defeat the French or rejoin the Austrians. They eventually sued for peace.
- Frederick the Great's operational strategy, in his prosecution of the Seven Years' War against the separate armies of the French, the Russians and the Austrians, can be considered an example of the advantage of interior lines in warfare.
- Interior lines also gave the Reds a distinct advantage over the Whites in the Russian Civil War.
- General Robert E. Lee used interior lines during the Battle of Antietam during the American Civil War in 1862.[7]
- Though the Pusan Perimeter (Korea, 1950) was not an intentional strategy, the concentration of UN forces within the Perimeter allowed quick movement of supplies and reinforcements via interior lines.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- Footnotes
- ^ a term invented by 19th century Swiss-French officer and prominent author Antoine-Henri Jomini
References
[edit]- ^ Michael D. Lundy (December 6, 2017). "Operations, chapter 5 - Passage of lines" (PDF). US Army. Retrieved May 4, 2020.
- ^ William O'Connor Morris (1895). Moltke a biographical and critical study. Рипол Классик. pp. 85–. ISBN 978-5-87074-092-8.
- ^ Alfred Higgins Burne (1946). Strategy as Exemplified in the Second World War: A Strategical Examination of the Land Operations. CUP Archive. pp. 17–. GGKEY:7F20S7AZG5P.
- ^ A General Biographical Dictionary: Comprising a Summary Account of the Most Distinguished Persons of All Ages, Nations, and Professions, Including More Than One Thousand Articles of American Biography ... A.V. Blake. 1845. pp. 1001–.
- ^ David T. Zabecki (27 September 2006). The German 1918 Offensives: A Case Study in The Operational Level of War. Routledge. pp. 66–. ISBN 978-1-134-25224-4.
- ^ Kent Masterson Brown, Esq. (1 August 2011). Retreat from Gettysburg: Lee, Logistics, and the Pennsylvania Campaign. UNC Press Books. pp. 44–. ISBN 978-0-8078-6942-0.
- ^ Kevin Dougherty (6 March 2015). The Vicksburg Campaign: Strategy, Battles and Key Figures. McFarland. pp. 107–. ISBN 978-1-4766-1993-4.