Jump to content

Personal Representative (CSRT): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m relevan->relevant - Correct typos in one click
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Primary sources|date=August 2009}}
The '''Personal Representative''' is an officer who serves before the [[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]]s, convened for the captives the [[United States]] holds in [[extrajudicial detention]] in the [[Guantanamo Bay detention camp]]s, in [[Cuba]].<ref name=OrderEstablishingCsrt20040707>
The '''Personal Representative''' is an officer who serves before the [[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]]s, convened for the captives the [[United States]] holds in [[extrajudicial detention]] in the [[Guantanamo Bay detention camp]]s, in [[Cuba]].<ref name=OrderEstablishingCsrt20040707>
{{cite web
{{Cite web
| url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2004/d20040707review.pdf
|url = http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2004/d20040707review.pdf
| title=Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunal
|title = Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunal
| date=[[July 7]] [[2004]]
|date = July 7, 2004
|author = Donald Rumsfeld
| author=[[Donald Rumsfeld]] [[Secretary of Defense]]
|author-link = Donald Rumsfeld
| publisher=[[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]]
|publisher = [[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]]
| accessdate=2007-04-26
|accessdate = 2007-04-26
| archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defenselink.mil%2Fnews%2FJul2004%2Fd20040707review.pdf&date=2009-08-04
|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20090805042135/http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2004/d20040707review.pdf
| archivedate=2009-08-04
|archivedate = 2009-08-05
|url-status = dead
}}</ref><ref name=CsrtFactSheet20061015>
}}</ref><ref name=CsrtFactSheet20061015>
{{cite web
{{Cite web
| url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2006/d20061017CSRT.pdf
|url = http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2006/d20061017CSRT.pdf
| title=Combatant Status Review Tribunal
|title = Combatant Status Review Tribunal
| date=[[October 15]] [[2006]]
|date = October 15, 2006
| publisher=[[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]]
|publisher = [[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]]
| accessdate=2007-04-26
|accessdate = 2007-04-26
| archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defenselink.mil%2Fnews%2FOct2006%2Fd20061017CSRT.pdf&date=2009-08-04
|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20090809025124/http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2006/d20061017CSRT.pdf
| archivedate=2009-08-04
|archivedate = 2009-08-09
|url-status = dead
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


==History of the Tribunals==
==History of the Tribunals==
{{unreferenced section|date=December 2010}}

Initially [[United States President]] [[George W. Bush]] asserted that captives taken during the "[[War on Terrorism|Global War on Terror]]":
Initially [[United States President]] [[George W. Bush]] asserted that captives taken during the "[[War on Terrorism|Global War on Terror]]":
* Did not qualify for [[Prisoner of War]] status, as defined by the [[Geneva Conventions]].
* Did not qualify for [[Prisoner of War]] status, as defined by the [[Geneva Conventions]].
Line 30: Line 34:
The Supreme Court addressed some aspects of the case. In particular, it ruled that the Guantanamo captives were entitled to an opportunity to hear, and challenge, the allegations the DoD felt justified their continued extrajudicial detention.
The Supreme Court addressed some aspects of the case. In particular, it ruled that the Guantanamo captives were entitled to an opportunity to hear, and challenge, the allegations the DoD felt justified their continued extrajudicial detention.


Supreme Court Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] wrote that the Department of Defense should convene Tribunals similar to those described in [[Army Regulation 190-8]].
Supreme Court Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] wrote that the Department of Defense should convene Tribunals similar to those described in [[Army Regulation 190-8]].


Army Regulation 190-8 sets out the procedure officers of the [[United States armed forces]] should follow to determine whether captives taken during a war were:
Army Regulation 190-8 sets out the procedure officers of the [[United States armed forces]] should follow to determine whether captives taken during a war were:
Line 38: Line 42:


==Duties of the Personal Representative==
==Duties of the Personal Representative==
{{unreferenced section|date=December 2010}}

Guantanamo captive's Personal Representatives duties included:
Guantanamo captive's Personal Representatives duties included:
#meeting with captive prior to their Tribunal, to explain the Combatant Status Review Tribunal procedure to them, including:
#meeting with captive prior to their Tribunal, to explain the Combatant Status Review Tribunal procedure to them, including:
Line 46: Line 50:
#*explaining that they would have an opportunity to respond to all the unclassified allegations presented at their Tribunal.
#*explaining that they would have an opportunity to respond to all the unclassified allegations presented at their Tribunal.
#*explaining that they could call upon the testimony of any witnesses they felt could address the allegations they faced, but that their Tribunal's President would then rule whether their witnesses were [[relevant (CSRT)|relevant]] and [[reasonably available (CSRT)|reasonably available]].
#*explaining that they could call upon the testimony of any witnesses they felt could address the allegations they faced, but that their Tribunal's President would then rule whether their witnesses were [[relevant (CSRT)|relevant]] and [[reasonably available (CSRT)|reasonably available]].
#*explaining that they could call upon any documents they felt could address the allegations they faced, and as with their witness requests, their Tribunal's President would then rule whether those documents were relevan and reasonably available.
#*explaining that they could call upon any documents they felt could address the allegations they faced, and as with their witness requests, their Tribunal's President would then rule whether those documents were relevant and reasonably available.

Personal Representatives had the authorization to review all the same classified evidence as the captive's [[Recorder (CSRT)|Recorder]].
According to [[Jumma Jan]]'s Personal Representative, as a matter of policy, Personal Representatives did not read any classified evidence until after they met with the captives<ref name=CsrtJummaJan>
[http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/Set_28_1949-2000.pdf#41 Summarized transcripts (.pdf)], from [[Jumma Jan]]'s ''[[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]]'' - pages 41-52</ref>:
{{quotation|"...he did tell me, at that time, that the information was in the file and yes I explained to him that the Tribunal does not look at the file, nor does the Personal Representative before we meet with the individual. Because it gives us both a more objective approach to deliberate the evidence against that side of the story."}}


==Criticisms of the performance of the Personal Representative==
==Criticisms of the performance of the Personal Representative==

[[Andy Worthington]], author of ''[[The Guantanamo Files]]'', singled out the Personal Representatives of two captives who were notably active on their behalf.<ref name=AndyWorthington44>
[[Andy Worthington]], author of ''[[The Guantanamo Files]]'', singled out the Personal Representatives of two captives who were notably active on their behalf.<ref name=AndyWorthington44>
{{cite news
{{Cite news
| url=http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=44
| url=http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=44
| title=Guantánamo whistleblowers: Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham is not the first insider to condemn the kangaroo courts
| title=Guantánamo whistleblowers: Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham is not the first insider to condemn the kangaroo courts
| publisher=[[CounterPunch]]
| publisher=[[CounterPunch]]
| author=[[Andy Worthington]]
| author=Andy Worthington
| author-link=Andy Worthington
| accessdate=2007-07-26
| accessdate=2007-07-26
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
The names of these officers has not been made public, but the captives they represented were: [[Farouq Ali Ahmed|Farouq Saif]] and [[Muhammad Khantumani|Mohammed al-Tumani]].
The names of these officers has not been made public, but the captives they represented were: [[Farouq Ali Ahmed|Farouq Saif]] and [[Muhammed Khan Tumani]].


==See also==
==See also==
{{wikisource|Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunal}}
{{Wikisource|Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunal}}
{{wikisource|Combatant Status Review Tribunal (fact sheet of October 17, 2006)}}
{{Wikisource|Combatant Status Review Tribunal (fact sheet of October 17, 2006)}}
*[[Recorder (CSRT)]]
*[[Recorder (CSRT)]]
*[[Tribunal President (CSRT)]]
*[[Tribunal President (CSRT)]]
Line 74: Line 73:


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
<references/>


==External links==
==External links==
*{{cite news
*{{Cite news
| url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2004/d20040730comb.pdf
| url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2004/d20040730comb.pdf
| title=Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba
| title=Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba
| publisher=[[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]]
| publisher=[[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]]
| author=[[Gordon England]]
| author=Gordon England
| author-link=Gordon R. England
| date=[[July 29]] [[2004]]
| date=July 29, 2004
| accessdate=2008-02-10
| accessdate=2008-02-10
| quote=
| quote=
}}
}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Personal Representative (Csrt)}}
[[Category:Guantanamo Bay captives legal and administrative procedures]]
[[Category:Guantanamo Bay captives legal and administrative procedures]]

Latest revision as of 20:14, 12 January 2023

The Personal Representative is an officer who serves before the Combatant Status Review Tribunals, convened for the captives the United States holds in extrajudicial detention in the Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba.[1][2]

History of the Tribunals

[edit]

Initially United States President George W. Bush asserted that captives taken during the "Global War on Terror":

This assertion was criticized by many legal scholars, and lawyers who volunteered to represent Guantanamo captives mounted legal challenges in the US Court system. The first legal challenge to be heard before the United States Supreme Court was Rasul v. Bush.

The Supreme Court addressed some aspects of the case. In particular, it ruled that the Guantanamo captives were entitled to an opportunity to hear, and challenge, the allegations the DoD felt justified their continued extrajudicial detention.

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote that the Department of Defense should convene Tribunals similar to those described in Army Regulation 190-8.

Army Regulation 190-8 sets out the procedure officers of the United States armed forces should follow to determine whether captives taken during a war were:

  1. lawful combatants, entitled to the protections of POW status.
  2. innocent civilian refugees, who should be released immediately.
  3. combatants who have acted in a manner that has stripped them of the protections of POW status.

Duties of the Personal Representative

[edit]

Guantanamo captive's Personal Representatives duties included:

  1. meeting with captive prior to their Tribunal, to explain the Combatant Status Review Tribunal procedure to them, including:
    • explaining that the Tribunals were administrative procedures, not judicial procedures.
    • explaining that captives were entitled to attend every Tribunal session where unclassified evidence was discusses;
    • explaining that captives were not obliged to testify at their Tribunals;
    • explaining that they would have an opportunity to respond to all the unclassified allegations presented at their Tribunal.
    • explaining that they could call upon the testimony of any witnesses they felt could address the allegations they faced, but that their Tribunal's President would then rule whether their witnesses were relevant and reasonably available.
    • explaining that they could call upon any documents they felt could address the allegations they faced, and as with their witness requests, their Tribunal's President would then rule whether those documents were relevant and reasonably available.

Criticisms of the performance of the Personal Representative

[edit]

Andy Worthington, author of The Guantanamo Files, singled out the Personal Representatives of two captives who were notably active on their behalf.[3] The names of these officers has not been made public, but the captives they represented were: Farouq Saif and Muhammed Khan Tumani.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Donald Rumsfeld (July 7, 2004). "Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunal" (PDF). Department of Defense. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-08-05. Retrieved 2007-04-26.
  2. ^ "Combatant Status Review Tribunal" (PDF). Department of Defense. October 15, 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-08-09. Retrieved 2007-04-26.
  3. ^ Andy Worthington. "Guantánamo whistleblowers: Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham is not the first insider to condemn the kangaroo courts". CounterPunch. Retrieved 2007-07-26.
[edit]