Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: template type. Add: s2cid, bibcode, doi, page, magazine, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 3763/3850 |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.3 |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2017}} |
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2017}} |
||
[[File:Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle whiteboard.jpg|thumb|What an HAIV might do during a mission.]] |
[[File:Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle whiteboard.jpg|thumb|What an HAIV might do during a mission.]] |
||
A '''Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle (HAIV)''' is a spacecraft being developed by [[NASA]] to deflect dangerous [[Near-Earth object|Near Earth objects (NEOs)]] such as comets and asteroids that threaten colliding with Earth.<ref>{{Cite web|title = An Innovative Solution to NASA's NEO Impact Threat Mitigation Grand Challenge and Flight Validation Mission Architecture Development|url = https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/niac/2012_phaseII_fellows_wie.html |
A '''Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle (HAIV)''' is a spacecraft being developed by [[NASA]] to deflect dangerous [[Near-Earth object|Near Earth objects (NEOs)]] such as comets and asteroids that threaten colliding with Earth.<ref>{{Cite web|title = An Innovative Solution to NASA's NEO Impact Threat Mitigation Grand Challenge and Flight Validation Mission Architecture Development|url = https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/niac/2012_phaseII_fellows_wie.html |website = NASA|access-date = 2016-01-29|language = en|first=Bong |last=Wie |date=February 11, 2013}}</ref> The vehicle is intended to use powerful explosives, such as nuclear bombs, to deflect the NEO by detonating on the surface, thus changing its trajectory to miss Earth. This method of [[asteroid impact avoidance]] is intended to be used on dangerous NEOs detected within a short time frame (less than 5 years) before a possible [[impact event]] with Earth. The idea came about when asteroid detection improved. Since then, scientists and engineers have sketched a design for an HAIV. |
||
== History == |
== History == |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== Project Icarus === |
=== Project Icarus === |
||
In 1967, Professor Paul Sandorff at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] asked his graduate students to come up with a plan to deflect [[1566 Icarus]], an asteroid about 1 km wide. An asteroid was observed to have an orbit bringing it into a close approach pass by Earth in the coming year, curiosity however motivated Sandorff to task his students to come up with a solution to the thought-experiment 'what if it were on an impact trajectory?'<ref name="Portree2012">{{Cite magazine|title = MIT Saves the World: Project Icarus (1967)|url = https://www.wired.com/2012/03/mit-saves-the-world-project-icarus-1967/|magazine = Wired |first=David S. F. |last=Portree |date=March 29, 2012 |access-date = 2016-02-13|language = en-US}}</ref><ref name=kleiman>{{cite book |editor-last=Kleiman |editor-first=Louis A. |url=http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=6840 |title=Project Icarus: an MIT Student Project in Systems Engineering |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071017105104/https://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=6840 |archive-date=October 17, 2007 |publisher=MIT Press |year=1968}}<!-- MIT Report No. 13 "Interdepartmental Student Project in Systems Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Spring Term, 1967 --></ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ips.gov.au/IPSHosted/neo/info/refers/Bk_Icarus_MIT.htm |title='Project Icarus' (book review)}}</ref> |
In 1967, Professor Paul Sandorff at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] asked his graduate students to come up with a plan to deflect [[1566 Icarus]], an asteroid about 1 km wide. An asteroid was observed to have an orbit bringing it into a close approach pass by Earth in the coming year, curiosity however motivated Sandorff to task his students to come up with a solution to the thought-experiment 'what if it were on an impact trajectory?'<ref name="Portree2012">{{Cite magazine|title = MIT Saves the World: Project Icarus (1967)|url = https://www.wired.com/2012/03/mit-saves-the-world-project-icarus-1967/|magazine = Wired |first=David S. F. |last=Portree |date=March 29, 2012 |access-date = 2016-02-13|language = en-US}}</ref><ref name=kleiman>{{cite book |editor-last=Kleiman |editor-first=Louis A. |url=http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=6840 |title=Project Icarus: an MIT Student Project in Systems Engineering |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071017105104/https://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=6840 |archive-date=October 17, 2007 |publisher=MIT Press |year=1968}}<!-- MIT Report No. 13 "Interdepartmental Student Project in Systems Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Spring Term, 1967 --></ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ips.gov.au/IPSHosted/neo/info/refers/Bk_Icarus_MIT.htm |title='Project Icarus' (book review) |access-date=July 21, 2016 |archive-date=June 2, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160602104006/http://www.ips.gov.au/IPSHosted/neo/info/refers/Bk_Icarus_MIT.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
||
As the students |
As the students knew nothing about the density and spin rate of the asteroid at the time, the team needed to propose a deflection solution that would not be held back by these unknowns. Eventually the team landed upon a conservative mission architecture that would work with 73 days remaining until impact.<ref name="Portree2012"/> It consisted of launching a repeated series of the [[Saturn V]] rocket vehicle then under development, to deliver 6 to 7 somewhat hypothetical [[Tsar Bomba|100-megaton nuclear explosive device]]s which would detonate about "50 to 100 feet" in proximity to the asteroids surface.<ref name="Portree2012"/> The first explosive Saturn-Icarus 1 [[physics package]] would arrive at the asteroid with 13 days before Earth-impact remaining, the second Saturn-Icarus 2, arriving with 10 days remaining and so on.<ref name="Portree2012"/> |
||
It is reported that analysis by Sandorff of the Project Icarus study, with an unspecified criteria and with the use of then estimated Saturn V launch success rates, that the project had a 71% chance of completely protecting the Earth and an 86% chance of reducing the damage a full impact would cause.<ref name="Portree2012"/> |
It is reported that analysis by Sandorff of the Project Icarus study, with an unspecified criteria and with the use of then estimated Saturn V launch success rates, that the project had a 71% chance of completely protecting the Earth and an 86% chance of reducing the damage a full impact would cause.<ref name="Portree2012"/> Though Project Icarus was never tested, it laid the foundation for future research on nuclear explosive device deflection techniques. |
||
Though Project Icarus was never tested, it laid the foundation for future research on nuclear explosive device deflection techniques. |
|||
=== Chelyabinsk meteor === |
=== Chelyabinsk meteor === |
||
| Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
== Design == |
== Design == |
||
After detecting many of the asteroids in the Solar System and observing their composition through meteorite remains, NASA has identified multiple large asteroids that may collide with Earth. To combat these NEOs, NASA has come up with the following design for an HAIV. The vehicle is split into two major parts; the leader craft and the follower craft.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|title = Conceptual Design of a Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle (HAIV) Flight Validation Mission|url = https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20130013405|date = August 19, 2013|location = Boston, MA, United States|first1 = Brent W.|last1 = Barbee|first2 = Bong|last2 = Wie|first3 = Mark|last3 = Steiner|first4 = Kenneth|last4 = Getzandanner}}</ref> |
After detecting many of the asteroids in the Solar System and observing their composition through meteorite remains, NASA has identified multiple large asteroids that may collide with Earth. To combat these NEOs, NASA has come up with the following design for an HAIV. The vehicle is split into two major parts; the leader craft and the follower craft.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|title = Conceptual Design of a Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle (HAIV) Flight Validation Mission|url = https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20130013405|date = August 19, 2013|location = Boston, MA, United States|first1 = Brent W.|last1 = Barbee|first2 = Bong|last2 = Wie|first3 = Mark|last3 = Steiner|first4 = Kenneth|last4 = Getzandanner|journal=AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference}}</ref> |
||
=== Leader craft === |
=== Leader craft === |
||
Latest revision as of 15:09, 13 January 2023
A Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle (HAIV) is a spacecraft being developed by NASA to deflect dangerous Near Earth objects (NEOs) such as comets and asteroids that threaten colliding with Earth.[1] The vehicle is intended to use powerful explosives, such as nuclear bombs, to deflect the NEO by detonating on the surface, thus changing its trajectory to miss Earth. This method of asteroid impact avoidance is intended to be used on dangerous NEOs detected within a short time frame (less than 5 years) before a possible impact event with Earth. The idea came about when asteroid detection improved. Since then, scientists and engineers have sketched a design for an HAIV.
History
[edit]Over the years, certain events brought up the idea of planetary defense from NEOs. These events lead to the development of the HAIV that NASA intends to use.
Project Icarus
[edit]In 1967, Professor Paul Sandorff at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology asked his graduate students to come up with a plan to deflect 1566 Icarus, an asteroid about 1 km wide. An asteroid was observed to have an orbit bringing it into a close approach pass by Earth in the coming year, curiosity however motivated Sandorff to task his students to come up with a solution to the thought-experiment 'what if it were on an impact trajectory?'[2][3][4]
As the students knew nothing about the density and spin rate of the asteroid at the time, the team needed to propose a deflection solution that would not be held back by these unknowns. Eventually the team landed upon a conservative mission architecture that would work with 73 days remaining until impact.[2] It consisted of launching a repeated series of the Saturn V rocket vehicle then under development, to deliver 6 to 7 somewhat hypothetical 100-megaton nuclear explosive devices which would detonate about "50 to 100 feet" in proximity to the asteroids surface.[2] The first explosive Saturn-Icarus 1 physics package would arrive at the asteroid with 13 days before Earth-impact remaining, the second Saturn-Icarus 2, arriving with 10 days remaining and so on.[2]
It is reported that analysis by Sandorff of the Project Icarus study, with an unspecified criteria and with the use of then estimated Saturn V launch success rates, that the project had a 71% chance of completely protecting the Earth and an 86% chance of reducing the damage a full impact would cause.[2] Though Project Icarus was never tested, it laid the foundation for future research on nuclear explosive device deflection techniques.
Chelyabinsk meteor
[edit]In 2013, a meteor about 30 meters in diameter and weighing about 13,000 metric tons had an impact event over Russia. Once in Earth's lower atmosphere it burned up and exploded. This relatively small meteor damaged over 7200 buildings and injured over 1400 people.[5] It brought renewed attention towards asteroid defense. The NASA Suomi NPP satellite was able to track the plume afterwards,[6] giving scientists more data on asteroids.
Design
[edit]After detecting many of the asteroids in the Solar System and observing their composition through meteorite remains, NASA has identified multiple large asteroids that may collide with Earth. To combat these NEOs, NASA has come up with the following design for an HAIV. The vehicle is split into two major parts; the leader craft and the follower craft.[7]
Leader craft
[edit]The leader craft is initially attached to the follower craft, but before impact the two craft are spread out by an extendable pillar known as the AstroMast Boom. Furthermore, it contains the primary guidance systems including normal cameras and Lidar (light based radar). The purpose of this craft is to make an initial crater in the target NEO where the follower craft may detonate in. Doing this helps direct the explosive energy of the follower craft, hopefully applying enough force to change the orbit of the NEO.[7]
Follower craft
[edit]The follower craft contains the following:
- Solar panels and batteries to power both the follower and leader craft.
- A large antenna and communication electronics to relay information back to Earth.
- A camera to check on the status of the leader craft.
- The NED (nuclear explosive device) that detonates upon impact with the NEO.
- Thrusters and fuel tanks to help the vehicle to travel towards the target NEO.
- Other support systems and fail safes in the case of a malfunction.
Once the leader craft impacts the NEO and makes a crater, the follower craft detonates its NED soon after. It also relays back whether the detonation was a success or failure which can be confirmed by observation from the Earth.[7]
Obstacles
[edit]There are numerous factors that have slowed the development of the HAIV. These include but aren't limited to budget, law, and irregular NEOs.
Budget
[edit]Initial test missions have cost between US$600 million to $1.8 billion, to test the feasibility of the guidance. A full mission may cost much more than this amount, especially in the case of a NEO detected with a short time till collision with Earth. With recent cuts to NASA's funding, it is unsure whether an HAIV mission will ever occur.
Law
[edit]The use of nuclear explosive devices is an international issue and will need to be addressed by the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. The 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty technically bans nuclear weapons in space. However it is unlikely that a nuclear explosive device, fuzed to be detonated only upon interception with a threatening celestial object,[8] with the sole intent of preventing that celestial body from impacting Earth would be regarded as an un-peaceful use of space, or that the explosive device sent to mitigate an Earth impact, explicitly designed to prevent harm to come to life would fall under the classification of a "weapon".[9]
Irregular NEOs
[edit]Sometimes NEOs are difficult to track. They could have an irregular orbit or be spinning, making it hard for the leader craft to make an initial crater. If the HAIV doesn't make proper contact, the NEO's orbit may not change and go on to collide with Earth. NASA is currently working out how to combat this problem for the HAIV,[citation needed] in contrast the project Icarus technique of MIT would not be hindered by these complications.
See also
[edit]MW-1#STABO – A chemical explosive, runway cratering munition, with a similar 2 stage operating mechanism.
References
[edit]- ^ Wie, Bong (February 11, 2013). "An Innovative Solution to NASA's NEO Impact Threat Mitigation Grand Challenge and Flight Validation Mission Architecture Development". NASA. Retrieved January 29, 2016.
- ^ a b c d e Portree, David S. F. (March 29, 2012). "MIT Saves the World: Project Icarus (1967)". Wired. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
- ^ Kleiman, Louis A., ed. (1968). Project Icarus: an MIT Student Project in Systems Engineering. MIT Press. Archived from the original on October 17, 2007.
- ^ "'Project Icarus' (book review)". Archived from the original on June 2, 2016. Retrieved July 21, 2016.
- ^ Radia, Kirit (February 16, 2013). "Russian Meteor: Chelyabinsk Cleaning Up After Meteor Blast". ABC News. Retrieved February 2, 2016.
- ^ Jenner, Lynn (August 14, 2013). "Around the World in Four Days: NASA Tracks Chelyabinsk Meteor Plume". NASA. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
- ^ a b c Barbee, Brent W.; Wie, Bong; Steiner, Mark; Getzandanner, Kenneth (August 19, 2013). "Conceptual Design of a Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle (HAIV) Flight Validation Mission". AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Boston, MA, United States.
- ^ Messier, Douglas (May 29, 2013). "Nuking Dangerous Asteroids Might Be the Best Protection, Expert Says". Space.com.
Wie admitted that sending nuclear weapons into space would be politically controversial. However, he said there are a number of safety features that could be built into the spacecraft to prevent the nuclear warhead from detonating in the event of a launch failure.
- ^ Remo, John L. (May 1, 2015). "The dilemma of nuclear energy in space". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 71 (3): 38. Bibcode:2015BuAtS..71c..38R. doi:10.1177/0096340215581359. S2CID 120686659.