Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiPrincess: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Brilliant: new section
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{essaysort}}
{{Talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell |1=
{{WikiProject Essays}}
{{WikiProject Department of Fun}}
{{WikiProject Primates |category=No}}
}}


==Sexism==
==Sexism==
Why is this page so sexist? {{unsigned|194.54.11.218|12:11, 14 January 2010}}
Why is this page so sexist? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:194.54.11.218|194.54.11.218]] ([[User talk:194.54.11.218|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/194.54.11.218|contribs]]) 12:11, 14 January 2010</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->


:This "WikiFauna" was created to fit in with the medieval theme, and fit beautifully with dragons and knights. If you can find a way to work princes into the article, be my guest. [[User:Bob the Wikipedian|Bob the Wikipedian]] <sup>([[User talk:Bob the Wikipedian|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bob the Wikipedian|contribs]]) </sup> 05:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
:This "WikiFauna" was created to fit in with the medieval theme, and fit beautifully with dragons and knights. If you can find a way to work princes into the article, be my guest. [[User:Bob the Wikipedian|Bob the Wikipedian]] <sup>([[User talk:Bob the Wikipedian|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bob the Wikipedian|contribs]]) </sup> 05:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
::These pages have since diverged from the fantasy/medieval theme ([[WP:WikiChef]], [[WP:WikiJanitor]], etc.), and it could easily be gender neutralized as a princess/prince page, anyway. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''' ☺]] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] ≽<sup>ʌ</sup>ⱷ҅<sub>ᴥ</sub>ⱷ<sup>ʌ</sup>≼ </span> 19:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


== Brilliant ==
== Brilliant ==


I must say this is brilliant. A very true page!--[[User:TheFEARgod|<font color="#003399">The'''FE'''</font><font color="red">'''AR'''god</font>]] ([[User talk:TheFEARgod|'''Ч''']]) 23:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I must say this is brilliant. A very true page!--[[User:TheFEARgod|<span style="color:#003399;">The'''FE'''</span><span style="color:red;">'''AR'''god</span>]] ([[User talk:TheFEARgod|'''Ч''']]) 23:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

== I love this article! ==
This page describes me perfectly! [[User:Thepoodlechef|Thepoodlechef]] ([[User talk:Thepoodlechef|talk]]) 04:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

== Should probably be moderated a bit ==
This should probably be recast in slightly less "does nothing useful at all" terms, or it won't work as a self-identification, only as a [[WP:DIVA]]- or [[WP:DICK]]-style labeling/attack page. This could fairly easily be rewritten to suggest that such users focus on social aspects of the site rather than on contributing to content, rather than suggesting that they never do any content work and feel themselves "above" it. As presently written, anyone who actually fit the description on this page qualified for account deletion as [[WP:NOTHERE]] to work on the encyclopedia. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''' ☺]] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] ≽<sup>ʌ</sup>ⱷ҅<sub>ᴥ</sub>ⱷ<sup>ʌ</sup>≼ </span> 19:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:56, 4 February 2023

Sexism

[edit]

Why is this page so sexist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.54.11.218 (talkcontribs) 12:11, 14 January 2010

This "WikiFauna" was created to fit in with the medieval theme, and fit beautifully with dragons and knights. If you can find a way to work princes into the article, be my guest. Bob the Wikipedian (talkcontribs) 05:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
These pages have since diverged from the fantasy/medieval theme (WP:WikiChef, WP:WikiJanitor, etc.), and it could easily be gender neutralized as a princess/prince page, anyway.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  19:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant

[edit]

I must say this is brilliant. A very true page!--TheFEARgod (Ч) 23:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I love this article!

[edit]

This page describes me perfectly! Thepoodlechef (talk) 04:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably be moderated a bit

[edit]

This should probably be recast in slightly less "does nothing useful at all" terms, or it won't work as a self-identification, only as a WP:DIVA- or WP:DICK-style labeling/attack page. This could fairly easily be rewritten to suggest that such users focus on social aspects of the site rather than on contributing to content, rather than suggesting that they never do any content work and feel themselves "above" it. As presently written, anyone who actually fit the description on this page qualified for account deletion as WP:NOTHERE to work on the encyclopedia.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  19:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]