Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1WAY FM: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Nakon|< |
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Nakon|<span style="color:#C50;">'''Nakon'''</span>]] 04:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC) |
||
===[[1WAY FM]]=== |
===[[1WAY FM]]=== |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Radio|list of Radio-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Radio|list of Radio-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)</small> |
||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br /> |
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br /> |
||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|< |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<span style="color:#009900;">have a cup</span>]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<span style="color:#4682b4;">beans</span>]] // </small> 00:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div> |
||
*'''delete''' coverage in merely confirms it exists. Nothing in depth. Being "locally notable" Does not mean automatically notable on WP. I did a search for this station on CanberraTimes.com.au and found zilch. [[User:LibStar|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar|talk]]) 07:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC) |
*'''delete''' coverage in merely confirms it exists. Nothing in depth. Being "locally notable" Does not mean automatically notable on WP. I did a search for this station on CanberraTimes.com.au and found zilch. [[User:LibStar|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar|talk]]) 07:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
||
Latest revision as of 00:59, 5 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 04:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- 1WAY FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Has been tagged for notability for several years, so time for a discussion. Possibly worth a redirect to List of radio stations in Australia. Boleyn (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Strong Keep Notable in its local area with wide coverage of the Canberra region, broadcasting at 20 000 watts ERP. Third party coverage exists e.g. https://www.radioinfo.com.au/news/canberra-community-radio-reaches-new-heights, and probably in local print media such as the Canberra Times too.--LavaDimNylons (talk) 03:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- the source you provided is not third party and not in depth. Please provide actual links to Canberra Times coverage. LibStar (talk) 07:28, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- delete coverage in merely confirms it exists. Nothing in depth. Being "locally notable" Does not mean automatically notable on WP. I did a search for this station on CanberraTimes.com.au and found zilch. LibStar (talk) 07:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.