Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AgentSpeak: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Keep |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''no consensus'''. with [[WP:NPASR|no prejudice against speedy renomination]] ([[Wikipedia:non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909'><span style="color:#909;">czar</span> [[User:Czar|<span style="color:#909;">♔</span>]]</span> 03:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
===[[AgentSpeak]]=== |
===[[AgentSpeak]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|U}} |
|||
:{{la|AgentSpeak}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AgentSpeak|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December |
:{{la|AgentSpeak}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AgentSpeak|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 8#{{anchorencode:AgentSpeak}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AgentSpeak Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources|AgentSpeak}}) |
:({{Find sources|AgentSpeak}}) |
||
The article seems to be self-promotion of the article creator's own product and sources. It needs secondary sourcing and evidence of notability. I have nothing against the subject, product, or article creator, but hope to generate enough interest to see that these concerns are met and the article brought up to speed for keeping. As it is now, it's woefully deficient. The COI problem is quite evident. Just as we have "biographies" here, not "autobiographies", we shouldn't have articles created by those with a significant COI. I'm sure participants will be able to point out even more relevant arguments for deleting or keeping this article. I sincerely hope that the result will be enough improvement of the article to justify keeping it. -- [[User:BullRangifer|Brangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) 03:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC) |
The article seems to be self-promotion of the article creator's own product and sources. It needs secondary sourcing and evidence of notability. I have nothing against the subject, product, or article creator, but hope to generate enough interest to see that these concerns are met and the article brought up to speed for keeping. As it is now, it's woefully deficient. The COI problem is quite evident. Just as we have "biographies" here, not "autobiographies", we shouldn't have articles created by those with a significant COI. I'm sure participants will be able to point out even more relevant arguments for deleting or keeping this article. I sincerely hope that the result will be enough improvement of the article to justify keeping it. -- [[User:BullRangifer|Brangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) 03:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 14: | ||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[user:buffbills7701|< |
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[user:buffbills7701|<span style="color:green;">buff</span>]][[user talk:buffbills7701|<span style="color:red;">bills</span>]][[User:Buffbills7701/Anti-Vandalism Hall Of Fame|<span style="color:green;">7701</span>]] 12:23, 1 December 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
| Line 14: | Line 20: | ||
*'''Keep''' - AfD should not be used to, "Generate enough interest to see that these concerns are met and the article brought up to speed for keeping." ~[[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]] 18:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - AfD should not be used to, "Generate enough interest to see that these concerns are met and the article brought up to speed for keeping." ~[[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]] 18:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
|||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
|||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 04:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
|||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 05:14, 5 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 03:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- AgentSpeak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article seems to be self-promotion of the article creator's own product and sources. It needs secondary sourcing and evidence of notability. I have nothing against the subject, product, or article creator, but hope to generate enough interest to see that these concerns are met and the article brought up to speed for keeping. As it is now, it's woefully deficient. The COI problem is quite evident. Just as we have "biographies" here, not "autobiographies", we shouldn't have articles created by those with a significant COI. I'm sure participants will be able to point out even more relevant arguments for deleting or keeping this article. I sincerely hope that the result will be enough improvement of the article to justify keeping it. -- Brangifer (talk) 03:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buffbills7701 12:23, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Note that no AfD notice has been placed on the AgentSpeak page, so isn't yet a proper AfD discussion. --Mark viking (talk) 01:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - AfD should not be used to, "Generate enough interest to see that these concerns are met and the article brought up to speed for keeping." ~KvnG 18:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.