Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalon High (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 23:14, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Avalon High (film)

Avalon High (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFF. Not even cast, much less begun filming. WP:CRYSTAL. —Kww(talk) 15:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

• Delete. Disney announced seven days ago their intention to add "six new movies and three series to air over the next two years", Avalon High being one of those six new films. This announcement is by no means sufficient to confer upon the subject enough notability for inclusion on Wikipedia. For now, delete per WP:NFF because the film has not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography and should not have its own article until such a time that this can be confirmed. No prejudice towards recreation should the film one day meet the necessary notability requirements. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 16:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

• Delete - not even a cast has been decided, violates WP:NFF as OP stated. ~ Baron Von Yiffington ^. _talk ^. _contribs 16:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Far too soon for this article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

• Comment: The same editor who created the article in question also created Phineas and Ferb: Across the Second Dimension and Den Brother, two additional films annonced in the same press release by Disney. Is everyone OK with those additional articles being listed in this AfD so they can be discussed concurrently? Big Bird (talk • contribs) 21:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Completely agree on Den Brother being added. No release date, no cast, no filming has started. Can't say I agree with Phineas and Ferb: Across the Second Dimension being lumped in, because it does have a cast and it does have a specific release date. ~ Baron Von Yiffington ^. _talk ^. _contribs 21:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

The article could say the release date is tomorrow but that's irrelevant because Disney did not make this announcement to Wikipedia. What's relevant is that reliable sources (Hollywood Reporter, Variety, WorldScreen and others) report only that the projects have been announced. There is no confirmation of production commencement nor release date, whatever's in the article is unverified and likely incorrect. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 21:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

No reason to be so hostile about it. You asked for my opinion on my talk page and I gave it. Simply saying "the date isn't real" would have been fine. I was assuming good faith on the Phineas and Ferb: Across the Second Dimension editor who added in the release date, but if you are certain that it is a made up date, then I'll give my delete vote towards it. ~ Baron Von Yiffington ^. _talk ^. _contribs 22:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

I went ahead and opened the AfD for Den Brother. Feel free to go and cast your vote for it there. I posted a note on the talk page of the Phineas and Ferb movie asking for sources. If I don't see any in a day or so, I will list that one for deletion too. ~ Baron Von Yiffington ^. _talk ^. _contribs 04:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

The comment about the other two films was not meant to be hostile. The road to hell being paved with good intentions, I do see how it could be construed that way and I apologize for not wording myself more carefully and giving you the impression that I criticized you for expressing your opinion after I asked for it. Anyways, your point is taken and I see that a separate AfD now exists. We'll deal with it in that manner. Thanks for your input! Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

• Delete way way way way to early for this one. No significant coverage, not even near to being in production. Fails WP:NFF. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 23:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.