Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Wade (Survivor contestant)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:DENY. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Benjamin Wade (Survivor contestant)

Benjamin Wade (Survivor contestant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a reality TV show contestant lack notability outside of the show. —Waveword2 (talk) 18:59, 15 April 2013‎— Waveword2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. 69.174.58.36 (talk) 17:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
• Delete non notable survivor contestant. JacobyEasox (talk) 19:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)— JacobyEasox (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep - clearly passes WP:GNG easily in its current version. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
• Delete per above. 63.117.17.130 (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)— 63.117.17.130 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete. Little or no notability outside the show. 174.236.96.218 (talk) 11:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)— 174.236.96.218 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete per above. Fails notability criteria and is full of info on how he did on the show. He never won the million dollars. 108.12.134.72 (talk) 16:39, 19 April 2013 (UTC)— 108.12.134.72 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and other criteria. Elmo420v (talk) 18:07, 20 April 2013 (UTC)— Elmo420v (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete per above. Most of the article focuses on his performance on the show. He didn't win the million dollar prize so the content should be merged to the Survivor articles. SurvivorFanHH (talk) 14:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)— SurvivorFanHH (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete per nom . 72.245.155.98 (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)— 72.245.155.98 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete per nom. Fails notability criteria. 199.168.146.146 (talk) 16:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)— 199.168.146.146 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• delete per nom. 174.236.79.96 (talk) 18:19, 21 April 2013 (UTC)— 174.236.79.96 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep While I am very wary of making articles for individual reality show contestants, they can be notable solely because they have been on the show, but that has to be from significant coverage about the player, and not just the show. As a Survivor fan, Wade has firmly established himself as one of the show's most colorful characters and the sourcing on the article - which mostly talk about his behavior on the show - demonstrate this. There is no requirement that notability outside of the show has to be met, just that it has to be more than a random contestant that participates. --MASEM (t) 22:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per Massem. I'm certainly not in favor of creating an article for every reality show contestant. But Wade's notability rises above most survivor contestants -- as indicated by the sources. There seems to be no BLP issues with this article either, so I see no detriment to the pedia in keeping this.  little green rosetta(talk)
  central scrutinizer  23:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.