Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Doggart: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:40, 5 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 05:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Doggart

Was tagged for speedy A7, but seems to assert notability. Possibly not notable anyway. N Shar 21:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Amendments made to confirm notability User:oxford2008[reply]

Keep Good case made that subject is notable. Tax Havens and their Uses a seminal book in its field, and Doggart's contributions to both the Montessori Institute and the World Bank renowned. Contribution seems to be well substantiated. User:IsaacNewton7
Comment. User's second edit. --N Shar 23:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Created and nominated for deletion all in one day? Please allow the original creator at least seven days to flesh out the article. Not all of us can sit down and manifest an entirely substantiated and referenced article in one sitting. --Ozgod 05:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Well researched and referenced article on a notable character. References check out, and have been supplemented since it was nominated for deletion. User:Cameron2000--Cameron2000 20:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Hello N Shar. Not sure what you mean about my 'second edit.' Only one comment made so far, I believe. Meantime, I agree that contribution seems more fleshed out now. Do you still have specific reservations on this entry?--Isaacnewton7 21:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep plenty of refs. Needs reformating a bit but I can't see the problem at all. NBeale 23:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — CharlotteWebb 00:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep this looks like a notable person, and the article seems to fit all the requirements for an article to exist. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 01:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article is a lot better now. We can close the discussion. --N Shar (talk • contribs) 01:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep No more dicussion is needed. Do we really have to wait another 5 days?--Dacium 01:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- Librarianofages 01:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep WP:SNOW - ElbridgeGerry t c block 03:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''keep'''. — [[User talk:CharlotteWebb|CharlotteWebb]] 05:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 ===[[Caroline Doggart]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
-:{{la|Caroline Doggart}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Doggart|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 February 20#{{anchorencode:Caroline Doggart}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 Was tagged for speedy A7, but seems to assert notability. Possibly not notable anyway. [[User:N Shar|N Shar]] 21:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 Amendments made to confirm notability [[User:oxford2008]]
-Goog case that subject is notable. Tax Havens and their Uses a seminal book in its field, and Doggart's contributions to both the Montessori Institute and the World Bank renowned. Contribution seems to be well substantiated. [[User:IsaacNewton7]]
+*'''Keep''' Good case made that subject is notable. Tax Havens and their Uses a seminal book in its field, and Doggart's contributions to both the Montessori Institute and the World Bank renowned. Contribution seems to be well substantiated. [[User:IsaacNewton7]]
 *'''Comment.''' User's second edit. --[[User:N Shar|N Shar]] 23:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' Created and nominated for deletion all in one day? Please allow the original creator at least seven days to flesh out the article. Not all of us can sit down and manifest an entirely substantiated and referenced article in one sitting. --[[User:Ozgod|Ozgod]] 05:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Strong Keep''' Well researched and referenced article on a notable character. References check out, and have been supplemented since it was nominated for deletion.  [[User:Cameron2000]]--[[User:Cameron2000|Cameron2000]] 20:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Comment.''' Hello N Shar. Not sure what you mean about my 'second edit.' Only one comment made so far, I believe. Meantime, I agree that contribution seems more fleshed out now. Do you still have specific reservations on this entry?--[[User:Isaacnewton7|Isaacnewton7]] 21:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Strong keep''' plenty of refs. Needs reformating a bit but I can't see the problem at all. [[User:NBeale|NBeale]] 23:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
+:'''&nbsp;<span style="color:#CC6600;">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</span>'''<br><small>&nbsp;Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — [[User talk:CharlotteWebb|CharlotteWebb]] 00:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
+*'''Strong Keep''' this looks like a notable person, and the article seems to fit all the requirements for an article to exist. [[User:Mermaid from the Baltic Sea|Mermaid from the Baltic Sea]] 01:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Comment.''' The article is a lot better now. We can close the discussion. --[[User:N Shar|N Shar]] ([[User talk:N Shar|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/N Shar|contribs]]) 01:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Speedy Keep''' No more dicussion is needed. Do we really have to wait another 5 days?--[[User:Dacium|Dacium]] 01:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''. -- [[User:Librarianofages|Librarianofages]] 01:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Speedy Keep''' [[WP:SNOW]] - [[User:ElbridgeGerry|ElbridgeGerry]] <small>[[User talk:ElbridgeGerry|t]] [[Special:Contributions/ElbridgeGerry|c]] [[Special:Blockip/ElbridgeGerry|block]]</small> 03:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>