Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colden Common F.C.: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:39, 6 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep all. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colden Common F.C.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article's PROD was removed as it had apparently been previously nominated for deletion. The club does not fulfill notability criteria as it has not played in the F.A. Cup (or even the F.A. Vase) and currently sits at the 11 tier of the football league system. I am also nominating the following related pages because they also have not played at a sufficiently high level:

Keep all I previously nominated these articles for deletion, but at the AfD it was noted that all clubs have played at the equivalent of the modern level 10 of the pyramid, and were kept as a result of that AfD. Number 5 7 13:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all have played at a high enough level in the past, and notability does not diminish over time. Giant Snowman 22:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I very much hope that the unwritten rule that playing above level 10 still applies, or this doesn't have much chance. Best sources around were this and this, plus an H2g2 page (apparently not considered a reliable source). Not a hope of meeting WP:CORP unless there are a lot of offline sources. Alzarian16 (talk) 10:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. The clubs may currently play at level 11 of the English football league system, but all three played in the top division of the Hampshire League during the 1990s, [1], [2], [3], a level of football which equates to the modern level 10, the level at which by long-standing consensus club notability is assumed. Colden Common F.C. won titles at that level, and Bishops Waltham F.C. played in the Wessex League Division Two from 2004 to 2006, at which time it was a level 10 division. I've tidied the Colden Common article up a bit. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. All three clubs have played at a high enough level to be deemed notable. Argyle 4 Life^talk 08:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''keep all'''. [[User:Sir Sputnik|Sir Sputnik]] ([[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 00:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 ===[[Colden Common F.C.]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}
 :{{la|Colden Common F.C.}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colden Common F.C.|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 March 1#{{anchorencode:Colden Common F.C.}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
@@ Line 8: / Line 15: @@
 :{{la|Fleetlands F.C.}}
 :{{la|Sporting Bishops Waltham F.C.}}
-*'''Keep all''' I previously nominated these articles for deletion, but at the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overton United F.C.|AfD]] it was noted that all clubs have played at the equivalent of the modern level 10 of the pyramid, and were kept as a result of that AfD. [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">Number</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 13:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Keep all''' I previously nominated these articles for deletion, but at the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overton United F.C.|AfD]] it was noted that all clubs have played at the equivalent of the modern level 10 of the pyramid, and were kept as a result of that AfD. [[User:Number 57|<span style="color:orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color:green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color:blue;">7</span>]] 13:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 16:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)</small>
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Football|list of Football-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 16:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Keep all''' have played at a high enough level in the past, and notability does not diminish over time. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 22:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''': I very much hope that the unwritten rule that playing above level 10 still applies, or this doesn't have much chance. Best sources around were [http://www.thisishampshire.net/sport/1588711.football_common_optimism/ this] and [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4222254.ece this], plus an [http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A19700219 H2g2 page] (apparently not considered a reliable source). Not a hope of meeting [[WP:CORP]] unless there are a lot of offline sources. [[User:Alzarian16|Alzarian16]] ([[User talk:Alzarian16|talk]]) 10:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Keep all'''. The clubs may ''currently'' play at level 11 of the [[English football league system]], but all three played in the top division of the [[Hampshire League]] during the 1990s, [http://web.archive.org/web/20080507234603/www.fchd.info/COLDENC.HTM], [http://web.archive.org/web/20071008135936/www.fchd.info/FLEETLAN.HTM], [http://web.archive.org/web/20080508001253/www.fchd.info/BISHOPWT.HTM], a level of football which equates to the modern level 10, the level at which by long-standing consensus club notability is assumed. Colden Common F.C. won titles at that level, and Bishops Waltham F.C. played in the [[Wessex League]] Division Two from 2004 to 2006, at which time it was a level 10 division. I've tidied the Colden Common article up a bit. cheers, [[User:Struway2|Struway2]] ([[User talk:Struway2|talk]]) 15:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Keep all'''. All three clubs have played at a high enough level to be deemed notable. [[User:Argyle 4 Life|<span style="color:#014421;">'''Argyle 4 Life'''</span>]][[User talk:Argyle 4 Life|<span style="color:#4863A0;"><sup>'''talk'''</sup></span>]] 08:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>