Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:35, 6 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE per some combination of SNOW, SPEEDY and BLP. Jehochman ^Talk 20:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken the step of applying WP:SNOW rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia, WP:CSD#A7. It is a biography of a living person that entirely lacks references, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page. Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted. Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable. Jehochman ^Talk 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Boothroyd

Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a WP:BLP. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. rootology/equality 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and the subject wants it that way. Syn 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. Nathan^T 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; and per Nathan. Too many problems. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. DavidBoothroyd (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Conti|✉ 20:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's request that the article be removed. AGK 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[David Boothroyd]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''DELETE per some combination of SNOW, SPEEDY and BLP'''. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 20:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+I have taken the step of applying [[WP:SNOW]] rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia, [[WP:CSD#A7]].  It is a biography of a living person that entirely lacks references, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page.  Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted.  Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable.  [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+===[[David Boothroyd]]===
 <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd}}</ul></div>
 :{{la|David Boothroyd}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:David Boothroyd|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd (2nd nomination)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd (2nd nomination)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 May 23#{{anchorencode:David Boothroyd}}|View log]])</noinclude>
-Non-notable, lack of sourcing.  <font color="0D670D" face="Georgia, Helvetica">[[User:Rootology|rootology]]</font>/<font color="red" face="Georgia, Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:Equality|equality]]</font> 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a [[WP:BLP]]. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. [[User:Rootology|<span style="color:#0D670D; font-family:Georgia, Helvetica;">rootology</span>]]/[[Wikipedia:Equality|<span style="color:red; font-family:Georgia, Helvetica;">equality</span>]] 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom and the subject wants it that way. '''[[User:Synergy|<span style="color:#222222;font-family:Times New Roman;">Sy</span>]]'''[[User_talk:Synergy|<span style="color:#222222;font-family:Times New Roman;">n</span>]] 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+* Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. [[User:Nathan|<strong style="color:#0033CC">Nathan</strong>]][[User talk:Nathan|<sup><strong style="color:#0033CC">  T  </strong></sup>]] 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+* Delete per nom; and per Nathan. Too many problems. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 19:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+* '''Comment'''. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. [[User:DavidBoothroyd|DavidBoothroyd]] ([[User talk:DavidBoothroyd|talk]]) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 20:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+* '''Delete'''; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_Boothroyd_(2nd_nomination)&diff=291872159&oldid=291868510 request] that the article be removed. [[User talk:AGK|AGK]] 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>