Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Anderson: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!-- Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
'''Nomination withdrawn'''. This AFD is hereby closed. [[User:Encephalon|<span style="color:navy;cursor:crosshair;">encephalon</span>]]'' 10:02, 15 November 2005 (UTC)'' |
|||
===[[Eric Anderson]]=== |
===[[Eric Anderson]]=== |
||
The person who is the title of the article is not notable enough to have an article about him, and the rest of the article is advertising. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 04:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC) |
<s>The person who is the title of the article is not notable enough to have an article about him, and the rest of the article is advertising. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 04:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC)</s> |
||
*'''Keep'''--there's justified precedent for keeping all winners of the Victoria Cross. [[User:Meelar|Meelar]] [[User talk:Meelar|(talk)]] 04:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''--there's justified precedent for keeping all winners of the Victoria Cross. [[User:Meelar|Meelar]] [[User talk:Meelar|(talk)]] 04:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
Never mind. The version I afd'd was vandalism. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 04:58, 15 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> |