Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabiana Udenio Gallery: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page. |
|||
<!-- |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the VfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result of the debate was '''Delete''' --''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 22:36, August 8, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Fabiana Udenio Gallery]]=== |
===[[Fabiana Udenio Gallery]]=== |
||
She's cute but I don't believe a gallery of photos is considered encyclopedic. Maybe one or two of these images can be rolled into [[Fabiana Udenio]] but there's no need for an article IMO [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 13:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
She's cute but I don't believe a gallery of photos is considered encyclopedic. Maybe one or two of these images can be rolled into [[Fabiana Udenio]] but there's no need for an article IMO [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 13:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''', agreed [[User:Jamesgibbon|< |
*'''Delete''', agreed [[User:Jamesgibbon|<span style="color:green">james</span><span style="color: blue">gibbon</span>]] 13:17, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete,''' obviously. Wikipedia is not a repository for images. [[User:Binadot|Binadot]] 21:57, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete,''' obviously. Wikipedia is not a repository for images. [[User:Binadot|Binadot]] 21:57, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as above. [[User:Eclipsed|Eclipsed]] 21:59, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as above. [[User:Eclipsed|Eclipsed]] 21:59, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Delete''' - mmmm, cuteness. We have commons for image galleries, we don't need this. But, I'll assume Trilobite is correct in that they are copyvios, especially since a bunch of them say WGN in the corner....hmmm.... --[[User:Phroziac|Phroziac]]<b> ([[User talk:Phroziac|talk]])</b> 22:13, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - mmmm, cuteness. We have commons for image galleries, we don't need this. But, I'll assume Trilobite is correct in that they are copyvios, especially since a bunch of them say WGN in the corner....hmmm.... --[[User:Phroziac|Phroziac]]<b> ([[User talk:Phroziac|talk]])</b> 22:13, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
**Actually the WGN just means they're frame grabs off TV, and screenshots are OK under fair use, however several of these shots are clearly montages made by vidcap websites, and it's considered bad form to post these. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 23:23, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
**Actually the WGN just means they're frame grabs off TV, and screenshots are OK under fair use, however several of these shots are clearly montages made by vidcap websites, and it's considered bad form to post these. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 23:23, 29 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> |
|||