Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infraction: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br >The result of the debate was '''KEEP''' |
|||
===[[infraction]]=== |
===[[infraction]]=== |
||
This is a dictionary definition, and I don't see how it can be expanded to be more than this. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 10:19, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
This is a dictionary definition, and I don't see how it can be expanded to be more than this. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 10:19, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Week keep''', since it appears as a term of legal art in [http://www.constitution.org/bouv/bouvier.htm Bouvier's Law Dictionary]. [[User:Gazpacho|Gazpacho]] 14:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Week keep''', since it appears as a term of legal art in [http://www.constitution.org/bouv/bouvier.htm Bouvier's Law Dictionary]. [[User:Gazpacho|Gazpacho]] 14:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - it's a dicdef of legal art. --[[User: |
*'''Delete''' - it's a dicdef of legal art. --[[User:BD2412/deletion debates| 8^D]] [[User talk:BD2412/deletion debates|<sup><span style="color:DarkGreen;">gab</span></sup>]] 22:18, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC) |
||
**You probably never broke the law or have expensive lawyers, so that you can ignore this knowledge. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 23:07, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' unless article is expanded. --[[User:Fuzzball!|Fuzzball!]] [[User_talk:Fuzzball!|(talk)]] 01:56, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' unless article is expanded. --[[User:Fuzzball!|Fuzzball!]] [[User_talk:Fuzzball!|(talk)]] 01:56, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' You are going to have to delete all of the other legal definitions if you want to get rid of this one. The motivation for deletion here is political, so be honest about it.[[User:Mlorrey|Mlorrey]] 05:02, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' You are going to have to delete all of the other legal definitions if you want to get rid of this one. The motivation for deletion here is political, so be honest about it.[[User:Mlorrey|Mlorrey]] 05:02, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
**Not only is the nomination not political, I honestly don't understand how it could be. I landed on this page after following the random page link, saw it was nothing more than a dictionary definition. Following a quick google search nothing suggested to me any potential to expand it into an encyclopædia article and so I nominated it for deletion. I haven't read any of the other legal definition articles so I can't comment on them. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 11:24, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
**Not only is the nomination not political, I honestly don't understand how it could be. I landed on this page after following the random page link, saw it was nothing more than a dictionary definition. Following a quick google search nothing suggested to me any potential to expand it into an encyclopædia article and so I nominated it for deletion. I haven't read any of the other legal definition articles so I can't comment on them. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 11:24, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
**Well, even now it is a bit more than a dicdef: the sentence about fine. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 21:22, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Merge/redirect''' into legal context. [[User:Radiant!| ]][[User_talk:Radiant!|Radiant]][[meta:mergist|_*]] 08:16, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Merge/redirect''' into legal context. [[User:Radiant!| ]][[User_talk:Radiant!|Radiant]][[meta:mergist|_*]] 08:16, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC) |
||
* Wiktionary does not yet have this word. I don't see a way to expand it either but if some future editor does, they can easily recreate it. '''[[m:Transwiki|Transwiki]]'''. [[User:Rossami|Rossami]] [[User talk:Rossami|(talk)]] 22:12, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
* Wiktionary does not yet have this word. I don't see a way to expand it either but if some future editor does, they can easily recreate it. '''[[m:Transwiki|Transwiki]]'''. [[User:Rossami|Rossami]] [[User talk:Rossami|(talk)]] 22:12, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''keep'''. Expandable. E.g., an important addition would be difference in legislatures of different states. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 02:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
*'''keep'''. Expandable. E.g., an important addition would be difference in legislatures of different states. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 02:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
*I have just transwikied this, see [[Wiktionary:Transwiki:Infraction]]; voters may amend their votes accordingly.--[[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]] 17:51, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*And I expanded and cleaned some nonsense a bit, just enough to show that the topic is far wider than a dicdef, voters may amend their votes accordingly once more. And there is still more to say, but by legal experts. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 23:06, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''', encyclopedic, at least now. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 23:59, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.'' </div > |
|||