User talk:Floatjon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 07:15, 7 February 2023

Redirect

Please note that some edits were made under my anon IP; I've redirected it (User_talk:216.103.50.52) here. The following topic was copied from that page:

Tallest float

Which was the tallest float? According to the LA Times, the tallest float was the 62 feet Honda's clown float. It was published in last Sunday's paper. Ucla90024 (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If memory serves, the Tower of Terror float ("A Sudden Drop in Pitch") was 100 feet tall. I'm not sure, but I think even JPL's float a couple years ago was taller than 62 feet. That same ad section also got last year's theme wrong (it was Passport to the World's Celebrations, not just Passport to the World) so it clearly wasn't fact-checked all that well. 216.103.50.52 (talk) 05:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, following myself up: The JPL float I was thinking of was only 50 feet tall, but the Disney float was indeed "nearly" 100 feet tall -- see, for example, http://www.galenfrysinger.com/companies.htm 216.103.50.52 (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnhill

Thanks for adding the photo! I've taken lots of photos in western Ohio, where I grew up, but only once (see the Port Washington article) have I gone through Tuscarawas County. Please leave me a note (go to my talk page and create a new section, or simply click the edit button if you'd like) if you have any questions about editing Wikipedia, and I'll try to help. Nyttend (talk) 13:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it's not done. It's technically possible, but only the developers can do it, and they have a backlog of bigger things to do. At one time, the situation was different, and Wikipedia:Changing attribution for an edit was created. Please note that it's no longer used. Nyttend (talk) 05:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robert DeLong

Started a page on Robert DeLong after hearing his song on Alt Nation and finding no article. Waiting for review. Putting this here so I can get to the article easily again. Floatjon (talk) 04:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And the relevant talk page. Floatjon (talk) 18:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Robert DeLong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gold Standard 22:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert DeLong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Floatjon. You have new messages at Darkwind's talk page.
Message added 00:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Darkwind (talk) 00:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cayucas

Hi. I'd like to thank you for the courtesy of notifying me about the re-opened AFD for the Cayucas. So... Thanks! -- Whpq (talk) 22:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian Arabic

Dear User,

As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 14:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sungrazing comets

Neither did I add mere spaces, but non-breaking thin spaces—where appropriate—for optimizing the display in justified text mode, and I also checked all the bibcode links. I opted to do just that again.--*thing goes (talk) 16:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		I award this Barnstar of Diligence for the random fixing of the citation access dates on Miracle of Sound. It must have been a tedious job, for something that few people will notice, but now those citations are just right. Thanks mate. Insert CleverPhrase Here 12:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest in IMDb

Thank you for disclosing your COI and not editing yourself as a connected contributor. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 11:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Varvatos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dearborn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:02, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ISSNs

Hi. I noticed that you like to fix ISSNs. I need you help! Please check Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia/ISSN errors which provides a list with all broken/invalid ISSNs and help fix them! -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Magioladitis: thanks for that -- I've been working through various CS1 errors (particularly dates), but it's good to know about this more comprehensive list of ISSN errors. It apparently hasn't been fully cleared in years, since the last entry on there was wrong since about 2008. I'll work on it as I get time. Given that there's under a couple hundred entries, shouldn't take long. --Floatjon (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is also Wikipedia:CHECKWIKI/WPC 108 dump which focuses only on ISSN with wrong checksum. Your help is appreciated! -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Magioladitis: OK, I've finished a first pass, knocking off all the easy ones from the list. The good news is that there are fewer than 30 entries left. The bad news is that the Google Books ref tool at http://reftag.appspot.com/gb.py is creating bad ISSNs almost as quickly as I can fix them (stripping hyphens). --Floatjon (talk) 08:52, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Floatjon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Fix date"??

Hi. I noticed you made this change to 3 GB barrier. The page history shows that that edit removed one character. And I can clearly see, in the previous version, that the template throws an error on that parameter, and that after your edit that error is gone and the access date is properly displayed. So... thank you for fixing the error!

But I can't for the life of me see what the error was, or what you changed, and it's bugging me. :) The diff display shows no change that I can see, not even e.g. a removed trailing space (not that a trailing space would cause the error from the template). Browser text searches within the page find "|accessdate=2016-06-07" in both versions, and in both sides of the diff display. In fact the exact same text string appears in many other cite templates on the page. But only this one raised an error. I was about to compare HTML in the two versions and thought... why don't I just ask Floatjon? So, here I am. :) Jeh (talk) 14:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was some kind of weird, non-printing character following the date (added in the previous, otherwise good, edit). Showed up in my browser as a block with 4 digits in it. I removed it, and hey presto. --Floatjon (talk) 15:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added in my edit. But I swear I never touched that line. :) What browser are you using? Jeh (talk) 15:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firefox. Only saw it when I checked the page out to edit, though. Weird. --Floatjon (talk) 02:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix Decorating Company

Know where in Irwindale Phoenix Decorating Company is moving to? Socalphoto (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not offhand, but I'm sure I could find out. All I know is their convoy out of post yesterday was going to go there. --Floatjon (talk) 04:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And now I know: 5400 Irwindale Ave (at Ornelas). Floatjon (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You don't go to the Tournament House anymore? No more photos from you now. Socalphoto (talk) 21:27, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I missed this year's GM announcement -- didn't find out about it until after it happened. Maybe I'll snap a photo at the awards announcement on 1/1 (but it probably won't get posted for a few days). Floatjon (talk) 23:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Floatjon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Floatjon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Parade theme

Wow. That was a strange one - "In mid-October 2019, Laura Farber was confirmed as President of the Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association. She announced that the 107th Rose Bowl Game theme will be "Dream! Believe! Achieve!" The bowl game will be held on 1 January 2021 in AT&T Stadium, Arlington, TX and returns to the Rose Bowl next year. The Tournament of Roses President will lead the 14-member Executive Committee and the organization of 935 volunteer members for the upcoming year." Wonder when and by whom it was made. And how we missed. Socalphoto (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just incredible, keep saying no parade in 2022. Don't what his or her problem is. Any way to stop the vandalism? Don't remember how now. Socalphoto (talk) 20:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Parade

User 2603:7080:c002:e65b:885f:4e6e:fe16:8933 is at it again. Just amazing. What's his beef? Not invited to march in the band? Socalphoto (talk) 19:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wonder how they can get the different IP. Use a public computers? Socalphoto (talk) 00:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably dynamic IP addresses from their ISP. Floatjon (talk) 00:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What good is a one-week protection. He or she will do them again after 1 week. Socalphoto (talk) 05:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think the international bands will participate in the 2022 Rose Parade. They will again roll over to the 2023 Rose Parade. Socalphoto (talk) 01:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably right for Sweden and Taiwan at least, which are not in the official lists. I've "cn"ed them in the band article, and corrected the count (adding 1 because PCC counts as 2). We'll see what happens with Japan, Panama, and Italy, but for now, we have to go with what Tournament is saying. Haven't seen a tentative parade lineup yet, and I don't have access to the press portal. On another note, our vandal seems to have been scared off for now at least, yay. Maybe the drumbeat of announcements (judges, queen's court, grand marshal) finally did the trick, on top of the temporary block. Floatjon (talk) 06:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Panama already told me they are not coming because vaccination and travel restrictions. Socalphoto (talk) 15:38, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Parade GM

Announcement of the Grand Marshal will be announced Oct. 13 at 10 a.m. Float constructions are doing fine. Equestrians selected. Hope all the international bands will get all the clearance and funds to make it this time. Socalphoto (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads up. Not sure I can make it to the announcement, but I'll try. Our float is coming along -- T1 last weekend -- but it's going to be a scramble. I see 40 floats on the current schedule, 2 of which do not yet have a designated builder (and several of which are new). And yeah, overall the float inspection schedule looks normal. Floatjon (talk) 06:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Floatjon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 3.143.170.91. Floatjon (talk) 03:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's allocated to Amazon Web Services. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Floatjon (talk) 03:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]