Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Guilbert: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:15, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Guilbert

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have a feeling inmy (not coconut) water that if I CSD this entirely unremarkable businessman the notice will be removed because there is a reference or two. They are all about the business or product, sez I. And the coconut water tastes of spam to me, btw. TheLongTone (talk) 14:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 16:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete none of the references rise to the true level of reliable general sources needed to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^{Babymissfortune} 11:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO, WP:ORG and WP:GNG. I found two sentences in a longer article in Vogue, but other references turning up in a gNews search seem to be confined to industry publications such as BevNet and Food Navigator. I think Inc. meets the reliable source definition, but that one reference in the article seems to be the only one, thus insufficient to establish notability. Last, the tone of the article is wholly promotional. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG fail. The company might be notable, the co-founder does not seem to be - not nearly enough google-news hits - and most of them are passing/interviews in relation to the product/company.Icewhiz (talk) 19:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Justin Guilbert]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 19:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
+===[[:Justin Guilbert]]===
 :{{la|Justin Guilbert}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Guilbert|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 6#{{anchorencode:Justin Guilbert}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Justin_Guilbert Stats]</span>)
 :({{Find sources AFD|Justin Guilbert}})
@@ Line 11: / Line 16: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 03:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)</small>
 <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
-<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<sup>[[User:Babymissfortune|<font style="color:#552582;">Baby</font>]][[User talk:Babymissfortune|<font style="color:#061922;">miss</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Babymissfortune|<font style="color:#FDB927;">fortune</font>]]</sup>''' 11:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Justin Guilbert]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
+<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<sup>[[User:Babymissfortune|<span style="color:#552582;">Baby</span>]][[User talk:Babymissfortune|<span style="color:#061922;">miss</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Babymissfortune|<span style="color:#FDB927;">fortune</span>]]</sup>''' 11:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
 *'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:BIO]], [[WP:ORG]] and [[WP:GNG]]. I found two sentences in a longer article [https://www.vogue.com/article/coconut-milk-oil-water-coffee-trend in ''Vogue''], but other references turning up in a gNews search seem to be confined to industry publications such as [https://www.bevnet.com/news/2015/harmless-harvest-adds-ceo-coo/ BevNet] and [https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2015/01/06/Harmless-Harvest-raw-coconut-water-We-re-not-competing-with-Vita-Coco# Food Navigator]. I think ''Inc.'' meets the [[RP|reliable source definition]], but that [https://www.inc.com/magazine/201606/liz-welch/harmless-harvest-coconut-water-sustainability.html one reference] in the article seems to be the only one, thus insufficient to establish notability. Last, the tone of the article is wholly promotional. [[User:Glane23|Geoff]] &#124; <sup> [[User talk:Glane23#top|Who, me?]]</sup> 18:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' GNG fail. The company might be notable, the co-founder does not seem to be - not nearly enough google-news hits - and most of them are passing/interviews in relation to the product/company.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 19:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>