Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirk Sommer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 10:03, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kirk Sommer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, written like an advert, appears to be an autobiography that is monitored by an IP, notability not apparent. Jim1138 (talk) 11:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability seems to be based on who he represents, not who he is. Emeraude (talk) 12:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability is not inherited. Being employed by notable people does not make you notable. Edward321 (talk) 01:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
'"Keep'" notability apparent based on citations — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamtom123 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and reasons above. Also: Being nominated as "Agent of the year" by a trade pub is of interest only to the trade and (perhaps) potential clients; it doesn't translate to encyclopedic notability. Dwpaul ^Talk 04:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 *'''Delete''' Notability is not inherited. Being employed by notable people does not make you notable. [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 01:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 *:'"Keep'" notability apparent based on citations  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jamtom123|Jamtom123]] ([[User talk:Jamtom123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jamtom123|contribs]]) 03:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-*'''Delete''' per nom and reasons above. Also: Being nominated as "Agent of the year" by a trade pub is of interest only to the trade and (perhaps) potential clients; it doesn't translate to encyclopedic notability. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">[[User:Dwpaul|<font color="#006633">Dwpaul</font>]]</span> <sup>''[[User talk:Dwpaul|<font color="#000666">Talk  </font>]] ''</sup> 04:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom and reasons above. Also: Being nominated as "Agent of the year" by a trade pub is of interest only to the trade and (perhaps) potential clients; it doesn't translate to encyclopedic notability. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">[[User:Dwpaul|<span style="color:#006633;">Dwpaul</span>]]</span> <sup>''[[User talk:Dwpaul|<span style="color:#000666;">Talk  </span>]] ''</sup> 04:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>