Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lambgoat: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 11:08, 7 February 2023

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:52, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lambgoat

Seems like a small site, insignificant outside it's small group of users. But feel free to correct me. 57.66.51.165 20:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This site is actually very important and should be left alone. (Unsigned comment by 216.197.136.14 (talk · contribs))

Delete. Vanity page. What's more interesting is this thread on that website's forums. They banded together to disrupt Wikipedia by vandalizing pages several times, especially the Atreyu article, as you can see from its edit history. And they're still at it. Nufy8 23:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article should stay. It relates to internet pop culture. Five million page views per month can't be an accident. (Unsigned comment by 12.208.76.100 (talk · contribs))

Delete nn website/forumcruft. --Etacar11 02:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article should most definitly stay. As someone alreagy mentioned lambgoat is an important site and highly relates to internet pop culture. Many people have heard of lambgoat yet have no clue what its all about and this article helps with that. It should stay just to inform the public what lambgoat in all its absurdity, is really about. ~A dude (Unsigned comment by 12.207.37.67 (talk · contribs))

Delete Forumcruft. KevinGovaerts 14:12:20, 2005-08-05 (UTC)

TLNR

Delete Wikipedia is not a web directory. Botsie 08:48, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
Delete nn, WP is Not, and possibly protect deleted as it is likely to be recreated by anonymous fans. Usrnme h8er 11:49, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below.  Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.
+<!--
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the VfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result of the debate was '''delete'''. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 09:52, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 ===[[Lambgoat]]===
 Seems like a small site, insignificant outside it's small group of users. But feel free to correct me. [[User:57.66.51.165|57.66.51.165]] 20:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
+This site is actually very important and should be left alone. <small>(Unsigned comment by {{User|216.197.136.14}})</small>
+*'''Delete'''. Vanity page. What's more interesting is [http://www.lambgoat.com/mb/thread.aspx?id=416726 this thread] on that website's forums. They banded together to disrupt Wikipedia by vandalizing pages several times, especially the [[Atreyu]] article, as you can see from its [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Atreyu&action=history edit history]. And they're still at it. [[User:Nufy8|Nufy8]] 23:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
+This article should stay. It relates to internet pop culture. Five million page views per month can't be an accident. <small>(Unsigned comment by {{User|12.208.76.100}})</small>
+*'''Delete''' nn website/forumcruft. --[[User:Etacar11|<span style="font-family:Courier;"><span style="color:#66CD00;">Etacar11</span></span>]] 02:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
+This article should most definitly stay. As someone alreagy mentioned
+lambgoat is an important site and highly relates to internet pop culture. Many people have heard of lambgoat yet have no clue what its all about and this article helps with that. It should stay just to inform the public what lambgoat in all its absurdity, is really about. ~A dude <small>(Unsigned comment by {{User|12.207.37.67}})</small>
+*'''Delete''' Forumcruft. [[User:KevinGovaerts|KevinGovaerts]] 14:12:20, 2005-08-05 (UTC)
+TLNR
+*'''Delete''' Wikipedia is not a web directory. [[User:Botsie|Botsie]] 08:48, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' nn, WP is Not, and possibly protect deleted as it is likely to be recreated by anonymous fans. [[User:Usrnme h8er|Usrnme h8er]] 11:49, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>