Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maintenance audit: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 19:11, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Proponents for keeping don't present good sources, and just saying "is notable GNG" will normally be given very little weight by the closing administrator. Aaron Brenneman (talk) 01:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance audit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. -- $Σ talk contribs$ 06:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Article is in fact original thought and needs to be restarted with references such as [1] [2]. —Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 07:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just curious have you said what you meant here as your response? You wish to keep the article yet you think it is original research?--User:Warrior777 (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I said the article at present is OR and needs to be rewritten, not deleted. —Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 15:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This subject is in fact notable (WP:GNG) and the article clearly defines many parameters of the subject. The article does however need sourcing (WP:VERIFY) and expansion for length and content. This article does have potential (WP:POTENTIAL).--User:Warrior777 (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Pure OR. Even if the subject turns out to be notable, it won't ever be notable enough to warrant a stand-alone article. Whatever can be found can be merged into preventive maintenance or similar articles. After all, the best one could hope for is a well sourced definition. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Content fork of audit. Curb Chain (talk) 15:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Original research that reads like it's from somebody selling consulting services. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was  delete. Proponents for keeping don't present good sources, and just saying "is notable GNG" will normally be given very little weight by the closing administrator. <!--'''Delete''' for Snottywong's AfD tool to pick this up-->[[User:Aaron Brenneman|Aaron Brenneman]] ([[User talk:Aaron Brenneman|talk]]) 01:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 ===[[Maintenance audit]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
 :{{la|Maintenance audit}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maintenance audit|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 August 9#{{anchorencode:Maintenance audit}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
 :({{Find sources|Maintenance audit}})
-[[WP:NOTESSAY|Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought]]. --<span style="text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em" class="texhtml">[[User:Σ|<font color="#BA0000">Σ</font>]] <sup><sub>[[User talk:Σ|<font color="#036">talk</font>]]</sub></sup><small><sub style="margin-left:-3.2ex">[[Special:Contributions/Σ|<font color="#036">contribs</font>]]</sub></small></span> 06:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
+[[WP:NOTESSAY|Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought]]. --<span style="text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em" class="texhtml">[[User:Σ|<span style="color:#BA0000;">Σ</span>]] <sup><sub>[[User talk:Σ|<span style="color:#036;">talk</span>]]</sub></sup><small><sub style="margin-left:-3.2ex">[[Special:Contributions/Σ|<span style="color:#036;">contribs</span>]]</sub></small></span> 06:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Keep.''' Article is in fact original thought and needs to be restarted with references such as [http://www.smpltd.co.uk/consultancy/maintenance-audits.htm] [http://www.rushtonintl.com/auditing.html].&nbsp;—''[[User:Yk Yk Yk|Yk&nbsp;<font color="#DC143C">Yk&nbsp;Yk</font>]]''&nbsp;&nbsp;<small>'''[[User talk:Yk Yk Yk|talk]]&nbsp;~&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Yk Yk Yk|contrib]]'''</small> 07:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Keep.''' Article is in fact original thought and needs to be restarted with references such as [http://www.smpltd.co.uk/consultancy/maintenance-audits.htm] [http://www.rushtonintl.com/auditing.html].&nbsp;—''[[User:Yk Yk Yk|Yk&nbsp;<span style="color:#DC143C;">Yk&nbsp;Yk</span>]]''&nbsp;&nbsp;<small>'''[[User talk:Yk Yk Yk|talk]]&nbsp;~&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Yk Yk Yk|contrib]]'''</small> 07:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small> —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 08:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC)</small>
 :*'''Comment''' Just curious have you said what you meant here as your response? You wish to keep the article yet you think it is original research?--[[User:Warrior777|User:Warrior777]] ([[User talk:Warrior777|talk]]) 10:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
-:::I said the article at present is OR and needs to be rewritten, not deleted.&nbsp;—''[[User:Yk Yk Yk|Yk&nbsp;<font color="#DC143C">Yk&nbsp;Yk</font>]]''&nbsp;&nbsp;<small>'''[[User talk:Yk Yk Yk|talk]]&nbsp;~&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Yk Yk Yk|contrib]]'''</small> 15:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
+:::I said the article at present is OR and needs to be rewritten, not deleted.&nbsp;—''[[User:Yk Yk Yk|Yk&nbsp;<span style="color:#DC143C;">Yk&nbsp;Yk</span>]]''&nbsp;&nbsp;<small>'''[[User talk:Yk Yk Yk|talk]]&nbsp;~&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Yk Yk Yk|contrib]]'''</small> 15:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' This subject is in fact notable ([[WP:GNG]]) and the article clearly defines many parameters of the subject. The article does however need sourcing ([[WP:VERIFY]]) and expansion for length and content. This article does have potential ([[WP:POTENTIAL]]).--[[User:Warrior777|User:Warrior777]] ([[User talk:Warrior777|talk]]) 10:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''': Pure OR. Even if the subject turns out to be notable, it won't ever be notable enough to warrant a stand-alone article. Whatever can be found can be merged into [[preventive maintenance]] or similar articles. After all, the best one could hope for is a well sourced definition. [[User:Dominus Vobisdu|Dominus Vobisdu]] ([[User talk:Dominus Vobisdu|talk]]) 12:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''  [[WP:FORK|Content fork]] of [[audit]]. [[User:Curb Chain|Curb Chain]] ([[User talk:Curb Chain|talk]]) 15:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''.  Original research that reads like it's from somebody [[WP:SPAM|selling]] [[WP:B2B|consulting services]]. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 16:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>