Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pregnancy photography: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:58, 8 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –MuZemike 23:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pregnancy photography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure WP:OR and WP:ESSAY; no sources at all. — Timneu22 · talk 13:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Borderline advertisement for the artist about a "trend" that does not seem to have any coverage. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 14:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Spam for one photographer. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: it's worth deleting the photos that were uploaded, too. — Timneu22 · talk 17:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone through the process at commons for the deletion of these images. The discussion page is located here if you wish to comment. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 23:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and all above. freshacconci talktalk 18:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikidvertising at best. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raisescale (talk • contribs) 20:19, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contra Pure advertisment, currently we have a discussion to delete those "pictures" on commons (klick). --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pregnancy fetishism, or possibly delete. MKFI (talk) 19:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirecting to pregnancy fetishism would imply that all photography of pregnancy is fetishism. The implications of such a line of thought are a bit disturbing.--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 23:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 ===[[Pregnancy photography]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}
 :{{la|Pregnancy photography}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pregnancy photography|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 June 28#{{anchorencode:Pregnancy photography}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pregnancy photography}}|2=AfD statistics}})
@@ Line 7: / Line 13: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Photography|list of Photography-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' Borderline advertisement for the artist about a "trend" that does not seem to have any coverage. --[[User:Fiftytwo thirty|Fiftytwo thirty]] ([[User talk:Fiftytwo thirty|talk]]) 14:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
-* '''Delete'''. Spam for one photographer. &mdash; [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 17:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
+* '''Delete'''. Spam for one photographer. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 17:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * '''Comment''': it's worth deleting the photos that were uploaded, too. &mdash; <small>[[User:Timneu22|Timneu22]]<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span>&#32; [[User talk:Timneu22|talk]]</small> 17:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 :* I have gone through the process at commons for the deletion of these images. The discussion page is located [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Pregnancy photography images|here]] if you wish to comment. --[[User:Fiftytwo thirty|Fiftytwo thirty]] ([[User talk:Fiftytwo thirty|talk]]) 23:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' per nom and all above. [[User:Freshacconci|<b><FONT COLOR="#000000">freshacconci</FONT></b>]][[User talk:Freshacconci|<b><FONT COLOR="#B22222"> talk</FONT><FONT COLOR="#2F4F4F">talk</FONT></b>]] 18:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom and all above. [[User:Freshacconci|<b><span style="color:#000000;">freshacconci</span></b>]][[User talk:Freshacconci|<b><span style="color:#B22222;"> talk</span><span style="color:#2F4F4F;">talk</span></b>]] 18:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Wikidvertising at best.  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Raisescale|Raisescale]] ([[User talk:Raisescale|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raisescale|contribs]]) 20:19, 29 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+* [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] '''Contra''' Pure advertisment, currently we have a discussion to delete those "pictures" on [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Pregnancy_photography_images commons (klick)]. --[[User:Yikrazuul|Yikrazuul]] ([[User talk:Yikrazuul|talk]]) 16:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Redirect''' to [[Pregnancy fetishism]], or possibly delete. [[User:MKFI|MKFI]] ([[User talk:MKFI|talk]]) 19:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
+** Redirecting to pregnancy fetishism would imply that all photography of pregnancy is fetishism. The implications of such a line of thought are a bit disturbing.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 12:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>