Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Episcopalians of Pittsburgh: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 19:32, 8 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Episcopalians of Pittsburgh

Non-notable church group. The high number of redlinks is a clue. Beeblbrox (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but clean up and source; group has received attention in Anglicanism circles due to its activism in re opposition to a gay bishop and churches leaving the Episcopalian synods. NYT PPG Toronto Star WaPo --Dhartung | Talk 22:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per sources identified by Dhartung. Jakew (talk) 21:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Dhartung. Bhaktivinode (talk) 13:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Sorry, notability is barely marginal. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''. [[User:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#CD5B45;font-family:comic sans ms;">Fabrictramp</span>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#CD5B45;font-family:Papyrus;">talk to me</span>]] 18:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 ===[[Progressive Episcopalians of Pittsburgh]]===
+{{ns:0|O}}
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|Progressive Episcopalians of Pittsburgh}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Progressive Episcopalians of Pittsburgh|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Episcopalians of Pittsburgh]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Episcopalians of Pittsburgh|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 May 18#{{anchorencode:Progressive Episcopalians of Pittsburgh}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 Non-[[WP:N|notable]] church group. The high number of [[redlinks]] is a clue. [[User:Beeblbrox|Beeblbrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblbrox|talk]]) 22:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
+* '''Keep''' but clean up and source; group has received attention in Anglicanism circles due to its activism in re opposition to a gay bishop and churches leaving the Episcopalian synods. [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/03/us/03episcopal.html?ei=5090&en=5da36f9ee37c4c39&ex=1351742400&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all NYT] [http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06308/735660-85.stm PPG] [http://www.thestar.com/article/261042 Toronto Star] [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/17/AR2006121700289_pf.html WaPo] --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 22:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
+* '''Weak keep''' per sources identified by [[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]]. [[User:Jakew|Jakew]] ([[User talk:Jakew|talk]]) 21:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
+* <small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Christianity|list of Christianity-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|Fabrictramp]] ([[User talk:Fabrictramp|talk]]) 22:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)</small>
+* <small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pennsylvania|list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|Fabrictramp]] ([[User talk:Fabrictramp|talk]]) 22:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)</small>
+* '''Keep''' per Dhartung. [[User:Bhaktivinode|Bhaktivinode]] ([[User talk:Bhaktivinode|talk]]) 13:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
+* '''Weak Delete''' Sorry, notability is barely marginal. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 00:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>